M&P 15 movement between upper and lower

Accuwedge is a solution to a problem that was blown WAAAAYYYY out of proportion by their marketing department. Go shoot it and don't worry about it.
 
My $4k APC has play between the upper and lower, too. It's normal, and something you only notice when you're not shooting, and just fingerbanging your gun.
 
So much for good engineering, production and QC.... Reverse questions would be:
- does design specify that there should be a play and gap?
- is the gun with gap better protected from elements than the one with proper fit?
- in terms of aiming/accuracy/handling which system is better, the one with wobbling joint or stabilized with no movements? (mind that you lean stock to your shoulder, not upper)
- in terms of reliability under constant stress which system is better, the one with wobbling joint or stabilized with no movements?

Of course minor wobbling won't have any _great_ effects, however comparing quality of manufacturing of modern firearm with 100 year old mass produced center fire rifles, MGs and semis I cannot stop wondering why it's call progress and why we have such low expectations.
 
So much for good engineering, production and QC.... Reverse questions would be:
- does design specify that there should be a play and gap?
- is the gun with gap better protected from elements than the one with proper fit?
- in terms of aiming/accuracy/handling which system is better, the one with wobbling joint or stabilized with no movements? (mind that you lean stock to your shoulder, not upper)
- in terms of reliability under constant stress which system is better, the one with wobbling joint or stabilized with no movements?

Of course minor wobbling won't have any _great_ effects, however comparing quality of manufacturing of modern firearm with 100 year old mass produced center fire rifles, MGs and semis I cannot stop wondering why it's call progress and why we have such low expectations.
It's an AR15. Just like the 'twangy' spring sound, some things just carry over with each successive model.
 
So much for good engineering, production and QC.... Reverse questions would be:
- does design specify that there should be a play and gap? If the rifle is built to Milspec(which the M&P is not) then yes the wobble is within tolerance.
- is the gun with gap better protected from elements than the one with proper fit?The gap is by design/within spec as noted above
- in terms of aiming/accuracy/handling which system is better, the one with wobbling joint or stabilized with no movements? (mind that you lean stock to your shoulder, not upper)This has been tested extensively and there is no performance change with relation to the receiver movement.
- in terms of reliability under constant stress which system is better, the one with wobbling joint or stabilized with no movements? Again,
the movement is within spec and the stress is on the upper not the lower


Of course minor wobbling won't have any _great_ effects, however comparing quality of manufacturing of modern firearm with 100 year old mass produced center fire rifles, MGs and semis I cannot stop wondering why it's call progress and why we have such low expectations.

In the Red. If you think older firearms didn't have play/wobble you're sadly mistaken. The processes used today and the materials ar far better than they have ever been.
 
In the Red. If you think older firearms didn't have play/wobble you're sadly mistaken. The processes used today and the materials ar far better than they have ever been.

Doesn't Colt Canada feeling the need to include accuwedge's kind of run counter to your post?
 
Doesn't Colt Canada feeling the need to include accuwedge's kind of run counter to your post?

The accu wedge is a complete waste of time and effort and offers absolutely zero tangible gain. Clever marketing to ill informed people is what makes them sell and that includes to our military and others. Much like the forward assist that was required by the US Army even though no one(with any level of intelligence) uses it.
 
The accu wedge is a complete waste of time and effort and offers absolutely zero tangible gain. Clever marketing to ill informed people is what makes them sell and that includes to our military and others. Much like the forward assist that was required by the US Army even though no one(with any level of intelligence) uses it.

So you're of the opinion that everything must be mil-spec, until you no longer care for it, then it's a waste of time?

Sorry, I'm still struggling to digest your statement about the forward assist.
 
So you're of the opinion that everything must be mil-spec, until you no longer care for it, then it's a waste of time? Sorry, I'm still struggling to digest your statement about the forward assist.
AR15s are akin to LEGO: You don't have to like or use every last piece in the box. I'm certainly not going to knock someone for trying or wanting something different - it's what has kept innovation going, ie: Keymod/M-LOK rail systems, enlarged trigger guards and flared magwells, ambidextrous controls and charging handles, the myriad of pistol, vertical grips, handstops and other rail attachments, folding and offset BUIS, the wide range of PDW, collapsible and precision stocks along with varying buffer tubes, springs and dampening and last but not least, the never-ending assortment of flash hiders and muzzle brakes.
 
So you're of the opinion that everything must be mil-spec, until you no longer care for it, then it's a waste of time?

Sorry, I'm still struggling to digest your statement about the forward assist.

Not my opinion just sound logic. Milspec is a standard, without a standard to adhere to everything else is a c@p shoot. Milspec is what servicemen use to defend themselves and our freedom. Difficult to find fault with it for lesser roles.

Yes the forward assist is useless. If you had attended any reputable courses/classes or simply thought about your manual of arms you would understand this.
 
OP if it bugs you just put half a foam ear plug in the lower receiver where the rear lug on the upper sits. Problem solved. I've never liked play in my rifles either. Just feels crappy.
 
Back
Top Bottom