M1A/M14S/M305 Headspace

Brobee

CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
528   0   1
Location
Alberta
Hello all....

I've been doing alot of re-barrelling and bolt replacements throughout my M1A/M14S collection and have noticed some things regarding headspace that I thought were both interesting and worth sharing. I don't yet have answers to all the questions I've generated for myself through the exercises however I have some tools on the way that should answer questions and will post updates as info/time permits. I'll also do some speculating as to what I think some of the observations mean, but please do yourself a favor and dissociate the speculation from the observations. For most readers the observations should be the main (if not the ONLY) value of the thread. Readers who find them interesting should interpret them for themselves, coming to their own conclusions. Anyway....I'll get off my soap box now and get going:

Interesting Observation #1: My .308 match grade headspace gauges don't agree with my RCPS precision micrometer:

rcbs_go_gauge_b.jpg


rcbs_go_gauge_a.jpg


The first photograph shows the 1.630 go gauge that is being measured inside the precision mic, resulting measurement of 1.557 (negative 3 thou) illustrated in the second photograph. So which one is right? My headspace gauge kit has 9 gauges in it, starting at 1.630 "go" and running up in 1 thou increments to 1.638 "field". Measuring each gauge in the set with the RCBS precision mic shows that they are indeed 1 thou apart from each other, however it still makes me wonder (however unlikely) if the gauges were all made sequentially on a machine that was not calibrated properly. Personally I think what's more likely is that the RCBS gauge is wrong. Anyway....a second set of headspace gauges from a different manufacturer is on the way so I should shortly have more info to report. Also, next time I go down to wholesale sports I'll bring the headspace gauge, get the counter boys to bring out 5 or 6 gauges, and meaure them all to get some idea of variability from one RCBS precision mic to another.

Interesting observation #2: In two chinese M14s's that I've re-barreled with american made barrels and then fitted with TRW bolts to headspace right on at 1.630 (as measured with the above gauge in bolts with no guts), on fired brass from these guns the same RCBS precision mic reads an average of 1.632!?!?! How can the fired brass headspace be 5 thou longer than the headspace as measured by the headspace gauge? (2 thou on the gauge + 3 thou differential between the headspace gauge and the headspace gauge in the RCBS precision mic)

Now for some speculation; (NOT PART OF MY OBSERVATIONS!) here's what I think is happening: these particular barrels started out life as 22 inch take-offs from brand-spanking-new springfield armory M1As that were then cut down to 18.6 inches and re-threaded. In subsequent testing they would not quite cycle with SA surplus ammo, so their gas ports were ever so slightly enlarged. The gas port enlargment effected reliable functioning of these guns, however I suspect it slightly accellerates the action of the piston on the operating rod. When the gun is fired, the brass expands to chamber dimensions under the ~50,000psi. In a normal M1A with a factory length barrel and a standard sized gas port, this pressure bleeds off sufficiently (just as per John Garand's design) to allow the brass to relax somewhat (shrinking just a wee bit as it does) before the op rod has undergone enough rearward travel to have started rearward movement of the bolt. In the case of a cutdown barrel with a slightly larger gas port (ie: NOT per John Garand's design), gas system pressure builds more quickly and acts on the piston/op rod/bolt faster...fast enough that the brass is being stretched from simultaneously being pulled rearward and held via burning propellant pressure agains the chamber walls. In these played with guns the gas system is balanced well enough to still work, if the above speculation is true then the system's also pretty hard on brass; hard enough that case-head separation could be an issue earlier than one might expect.

Interesting Observation #3: In the same guns mentionned above, swapping out the TRW bolts for the original (serial number matched) chicom bolts and then trying to measure headspace with the headspace gauges (bolts disassembled of course!), these guns both SWALLOW the 1.638 field reject gauge...the largest one in the kit! I have not fired either of these guns with the chinese bolts in them, so I don't have a measurement from the RCBS precision mic, however I have commissioned construction of a custom set of "extra long" headspace gauges (from 1.639 through 1.646) that should arrive shortly. In trying to research the differences in acceptable headspace between .308 and 7.62x51, more specifically how long is "too long", no easy answer was out there. Seems like there is some debate as to what field reject for 7.62x51 should be. I'd be curious to read what the general CGN consensus is. Based on what I've read and after talking with some folk for whom I have some significant respect, for now I'm going with 1.645. When the gauges arrive I'll drop them into these two guns with their original bolts as well as a couple of unaltered M14s's still in the grease and then report back with an update to this thread. What do you guys think? How long is too long?

Anyway, that's it for now. Given the number of folk who are making decisions based on measurements from an RCBS precision mic, I figured it was worth posting. For those running chinese bolts I'm also hoping to learn a bit more about "how long is too long". Will report more as tools arrive and I can make additional observations.

Good luck...

Brobee
 
Last edited:
Headspace is a firearm manufacturing tolerance. It doesn't actually get measured. Headspace guages only tell you if the headspace is within tolerance. Nothing more.
Cartridges do not have headspace.
If the bolt closes on a Field guage, the headspace is excessive and the rifle is unsafe.
 
7.62x51 Headspace gauges

The "field" gauge for the 7.62 was specified at 1.645.As you know, they are'nt available commercially,so it will be interesting to do some checking with your 1.646 gauge when you get it.Lacking a "field" gauge for the 7.62,I've chosen to use the .308 Win "field" gauge at 1.638 as a "no-go" gauge for my two 7.62 chambers,one in a Garand wearing an Italian military 7.62 Typo 2 barrel,and the other in a stock H&R M14.Both qualify on this gauge,and perform well with military 7.62 ammo and handloads in DA/IVI 7.62 brass.I'm comfortable with this given that the 7.62 "no-go" gauge is specified at 1.640.Given the fact that a lot of 7.62 ammo will chamber in a .308 Win chamber, and the fact that a lot of folks will fire .308 Win ammo or handloads set up to .308 Win dimensions in these rifles,I think it is prudent to keep headspace within commercial tolerances for the .308 Win.Some claim that 1.632 is a good minimum for M14 chambers-tight enough,but with some allowance for safe and reliable functioning in the case of powder fouling accumulating in the chamber.I've not played with the Chicom rifles, but the bolts are reputed to be considerably softer than US GI,so I think it is a good idea to install a US GI bolt.It is interesting that your "go" gauge measures less than 1.630.Is it a Clymer or a Forster?The Clymer gauges are purported to be held to a tighter and more uniform spec-maybe that's why they are more expensive.A last comment on 7.62 headspace.I remember basic training with the FNC1 42 yrs ago,where we all had our individual rifles in our lockers,but breechblocks were collected and stored centrally for security and then doled out at random when required.In fact,this was the normal security practice in all units.No problems in live fire among any of the rifles in our troop,but I do remember one of our Sgts patrolling the firing line with a coke bottle full of motor oil and offering a liberal dose in the breechblock carrier if anyone wanted it.I turned it down because even at a tender age I knew excess oil and ammo did'nt mix.Besides,who wanted a face full of hot oil splash when you were trying to shoot.
 
I don't know, you making me think at the end of the long weekend just might not be nice. I just measured my Forster 1.630 headspace guage with my RCBS 308 Mic. and mine reads -.0005 to -.001
Dave
 
sunray said:
Headspace is a firearm manufacturing tolerance. It doesn't actually get measured. Headspace guages only tell you if the headspace is within tolerance. Nothing more.
Cartridges do not have headspace.
If the bolt closes on a Field guage, the headspace is excessive and the rifle is unsafe.

So are you saying that you can't measure the chamber headspace (critical chamber dimensions) of a given rifle using the RCBS precision micrometer and fired brass? (done using minimum 5 pieces of fired brass and averaging the readings)

I agree that headspace is a firearms manufacturing tolerance. I completely disagree that you can't measure chamber headspace in any given rifle. By it's very nature, "tolerance" requires both an upper and lower limit. With respect to headspace it most commonly relates to chamber length. For .308 winchester, the tolerance is defined by SAMMI as follows:

1.630 - minimum chamber length (go)
1.634 - semi-maximum chamber length (no-go)
1.638 - maximum chamber length (field)

Despite looking hard, I'm not sure what the tolerance specs are for 7.62x51 although they seem to be something like 1.635 "go" to 1.645 "no-go". What I do know is that out of the 15+ stock chinese m1a clones that I have played with, without exception their factory bolts close easily on a 1.638 SAMMI spec "field" gauge. So theoretically, in their factory condition they should all be deemed "unsafe" for use with commercial .308 ammo loaded to .308 SAMMI specifications.

But try telling that to any one of the thousands of board members who shoot these things with factory ammo every weekend and I bet you get an earful. Also noteworthy is that no one has reported a blown up rifle. For me anyway something does not quite add up in the M14/M1A/M305 headspace world and
I'm just trying to learn why.
 
purple: my gauges are the .308 match rifle headspace gauges made by Forster as sold in the big kit by Brownells. I have a duplicate set made by Clymer en-route and will report on "Foster vs Clymer" as soon as they arrive. As a side note, Clymer are the folk making the larger gauges for me. I expect them sometime within the next month. With respect to my Forster gauge measuring short, I think my RCBS precision mic likely more suspect than the gauge, as all the gauges in the complete set measure (using the RCBS Precision Mic as the measuring tool) exactly 3 thou shorter than what's printed on the gauge. Anyway...additional gauges should clear up which one is "wrong".

Thanks for your experience....
 
Last edited:
Ishootguns: Thanks for the data! So far we have:

-0.003 - Brobee's RCBS Precision Mic vs Forster "GO" Headspace Gauge
-0.001 - Ishootguns' RCBSPM vs FGHG

Anyone else with the tools to contribute?
 
Now remember that you are using .308 Win gauges and not the NATO 7.62mm GO, NO-GO , and Field gauges, so don't get too worked up about all the Norinco rifles closing on a .308 NOGO 1.638" gauge.

A NATO NO-GO gauge mikes at 25 thou (lemme see....1.630" + 0.025 = 1.655") so don't you worry. The Norinco rifles have a long way to go before being deemed with excessive headspace. Bolt interchageability is what it's all about. All of the USGI M14's I've owned (about 5 of them) all gauged above 14 thou (1.630" + 0.014 = 1.644"). Holy shzt !! :eek:

Hope this helps,
Barney
 
Thanks Hungry! I've been looking hard for data on the Nato 7.62x51 gauge measurements but to no avail. Some folks refer to a NATO "FIELD" gauge being 1.645 whereas others (like yourself) weigh in much longer with numbers like Nato NO-GO (which should be about 4 thou shorter than "FIELD") = 1.655...that's like 14 thou difference!

On this subject I even wound up in a conversation with the main man at Clymer. My original request was that they make me a set of NATO 7.62x51 GO, NO-GO, & FIELD gauges, which he flat-out refused; his reason being that he was unaware of any official 7.62 NATO spec and that consequently he was unprepared to take on the liability with stamping a set of 7.62 gauges this way. So I then asked him if he would make me a set of gauges in 1 thou increments ranging from 1.639 to 1.646 to which he replied "NO PROBLEM! You'll have them in a couple of weeks". Looks like I should have got some even longer ones made up!

I suspect that the reason there are no commercially available NATO 7.62 gauges is that there is no professional consensus amongst the commercial manufacturers with respect to what the specs are. Already in this thread we've got two wildly differing lengths (1.645 FIELD from purple and 1.655 NO-GO from Hungry) from two respected community members.

So Hungry or purple...can you (or anyone else, PLEASE!) point me in the right direction to track down some sort of primary source or document to confirm the official heaspace GO, NO-GO, and FIELD measurements for 7.62x51 NATO? I don't ask to be a dink, I ask because I sincerely don't know and everyone I have asked to date come up with wildly different answers. The only common theme is that the spec is longer than .308 winchester, but I'd really like to know how "long is too long?"

While I'm not too worked up about it, it does concern me as there are some instances where I've had to replace a chinese bolt with another chinese bolt. Knowing that they all close on a 1.638 .308 field gauge just means they are longer than SAMMI .308 spec...but how long are they? My en-route custom headspace gauges should provide some answers to this question, but I'm still foggy when it comes to "how long is too long"?

Thanks again for your selfless contributions Hungry...I've learned alot from you and am grateful.
 
Last edited:
+/-3000 rounds a year...:)

Thanks for the link!

Edited to add: in the link, the author makes reference to the NATO 7.62 FIELD gauge being 1.6455, NOT 1.655 as you mentioned Hungry.
 
Last edited:
And after a more studied reading, the author brings up something that should concern anyone swaping out their chi-com bolt for a USGI one and planning to shoot surplus ammo (like that most recent pretty good crop of South African 7.62x51!). Most of the TRW and HRT bolts I've played with have wound up effecting headspace that's been either too tight (required some minor lapping) or very very close to (ie: right on) the 1.630 SAMMI Spec for .308 Win. In the article referenced above by Hungry, the author has this to say:

Let's say we have a brand new .308 Winchester rifle with a minimum headspace chamber. It measures at 1.630". We find a deal on some Mil-Surp 7.62x51mm NATO ammo & go to the range. Ammo that averages at 1.6315" will be a very, very tight fit in a 1.630" chambered rifle. Too tight in fact. If you are able to chamber the cartridge you will have higher than normal pressures. Given a few other variables this could result in redlining the chamber pressure & having the rifle self disassemble a few inches from your face. If it's an autoloader then there's a real good chance you'll have a slam fire (where the cartridge fires as the bolt lock up without any desire for it to do so on your part) or an out of battery fire (where the cartridge fires before the bolt is locked) which will cause a self disassembling firearm to materialize in your hands. .0015" is a very big deal when you lack that much space.

And later this:

Firearms are designed with a safety margin. They won't instantly blow up the second you're 1 PSI over the maximum chamber pressure. But with repeated abuse they will fail. Odds are the people that are using the cartridges interchangeably are doing so safely without realizing why.

If their 7.62x51mm NATO chamber is towards the minimum safe headspace (1.6355") then a .308 Winchester cartridge that measures 1.630" will result in .0055" of free space that the cartridge must stretch to fill. For comparison a .308 Winchester chamber that measures 1.6355" (No Go dimension -.0005") will leave .0055" of room for a 1.630" cartridge. It'll still be safe to fire but will start to show a decrease in accuracy as well as a shortening of brass life.

And then this (which was the eye opener for me, as I shoot alot of surplus in my tightly headspaced frankein-14):

Similarly a person may have a .308 Winchester & use 7.62x51mm NATO Mil-Surp ammo with no problems. If it's a bolt action then the chamber is right at or over the working average for the cartridge - specifically his chamber will be 1.6315" or longer. If it's a semi-auto then I'd say his chamber must be at 1.632" or longer for everything to work fine. If his chamber is any shorter than that for either type of action then he's either getting some ammo that's shorter than average or he’s just real lucky.

Sounds to me like he might have the warning bells ringing in the back of his head if asked to play with my subject frankein-14 (which is a norinco M14s with a TRW bolt fitted to approximately 1.6305). To turn the question around and ask "how short is too short?", this author would suggest that if you plan on firing surplus ammo in your m1a/305/14s then 1.6320 is the minimum safe headspace. If the cartridge specifications he quotes are accurate then I would tend to agree and, while your #### might fall off, it sounds like it might pay to worry about that 2 thou. Consequently it might be importnt to dig deeper regarding Observation #1 in the thread-opening post.
 
Last edited:
But then on the other side of the coin, here's what Clint McKee of Fulton has to say about the subject:

Jerry Kuhnhausen, in his classic Shop Manual (available from Fulton Armory; see the M1 Rifle Parts & Accessories or M14 Rifle Parts and Accessories Pages under Books) has published a somewhat controversial recommendation concerning .308 Winchester and 7.62x51mm NATO ammo, headspace & chambers. I broached the subject with him some months ago. He had his plate full, so we decided to chat on this in the future. When we do I'll report the results of our conversation.

I completely agree with Jerry that if you have a chamber with headspace much in excess of 1.636 (say, 1.638, SAAMI field reject), you must use only U.S. or NATO Mil Spec Ammo (always marked 7.62mm & with a cross enclosed by a circle) since the NATO mil spec calls for a far more "robust" brass case than often found in commercial (read .308 Winchester) cartridges. It is precisely why Lake City brass is so highly sought. Lake City brass is Nato spec and reloadable (most NATO is not reloadable, rather it is Berdan primed). Indeed, cheaper commercial ammo can fail at the 1.638 headspace (e.g., UMC) in an M14/M1 Garand. Many military gas guns (e.g., M14 Rifles & M60 Machine guns) run wildly long headspace by commercial (SAAMI) standards (U.S. Military field reject limit for the M60 & M14 is 1.6455, nearly 16 thousandths beyond commercial (SAAMI) GO, & nearly 8 thousandths beyond commercial (SAAMI) field reject limit!).

I also agree that 1.631-1.632 is a near perfect headspace for an M14/M1A or M1 Garand chambered in .308 Winchester. But I think that it also near perfect for 7.62mm NATO!

I have measured many, many types/manufacturers of commercial and NATO ammo via cartridge "headspace" gauges as well as "in rifle" checks. If anything, I have found various Nato ammo to be in much tighter headspace/chamber compliance than commercial ammo. Indeed, sometimes commercial ammo can not be chambered "by hand" in an M14/M1A with, say, 1.631 headspace (bolt will not close completely by gentle hand manipulation on a stripped bolt, although it will close & function when chambered by the force of the rifle's loading inertia), though I have never seen this with NATO spec ammo. I.e., if anything, NATO ammo seems to hold at the minimum SAAMI cartridge headspace of 1.629-1.630, better than some commercial ammo!

So, why set a very long 1.636 headspace in an M14/M1A or M1 Garand? It probably is the conflict mentioned above. Military headspace gauges say one thing, SAAMI headspace gauges say something else, as do the spec's/compliance covering ammo. In a court of law, who will prevail? I think Kuhnhausen gave all those who do this work a safe way out. However, I believe it not in your, or your rifle's, best interest. Whether you have a NATO chambered barrel (M14/M1 Garand G.I. ".308 Win."/7.62mm NATO barrels all have NATO chambers), or a .308 Winchester chamber, keep the headspace within SAAMI limits (1.630 GO, 1.634 NO GO, 1.638 FIELD REJECT). This subject is a bit confusing, and for me difficult to explain in a one way conversation!

Clint McKee

Looks like he racks up another vote for 1.6455 FIELD in 7.62x51...
 
7.62 headspace specs

I've never been able to find definitive documentation on this,but a CFTO or EMEI which gave inspection standards for the FNC1 would do it for me.The only official document I have is US Army TM 9-1005-223-35 for the M14 which specifies that the field reject limit is 1.6455-and you can take that to the bank!!.From this and my readings of statements by military armourers in various publications,I understand the acepted 7.62 standards to be as follows:
Go-1.633
No-Go-1.6405
Field reject-1.6455
In the absence of gauges for the 7.62, I use the .308 Win "Go" gauge at 1.630 with .003 shimstock on the base as a "Go" gauge for the 7.62.I use the .308 Win "field" gauge at 1.638 as a "No-GO" gauge for the 7.62.I choose to do this because I shoot handloads and want to keep headspace tight and case stretching to a minimum.If I wanted to replicate the military "field" or reject gauge I would simply add shimstock to the base of the .308 Win "field" gauge until I achieved the correct length.I always choose to stay a bit cautious,but would have absolutely no reservations about shooting MILSPEC 7.62 ammo in any 7.62 chamber which did not fail the 7.62 "field" gauge.I'd have some reservations about using commercial .308 brass in a max lenth 7.62 chamber,and certainly would not contemplate salvaging it for reloads.This is because .308 brass is made to a different spec and is not as durable as MILSPEC brass.You may learn something when you compare your new Clymer gauges to the Forster.My .30-06 Forster "go' gauge is shorter than my Cdn military "go" gauge while my Forster "field" gauge for the .30-06 is about the same length as my Clymer "no-go".
 
I own seven Norincos (new) in various configurations. As with all other firearms, I expect the manufacturer, and dealer, to participate in some sort of due diligence. Meaning, I expect my NEW firearm to be safe to shoot. I'm not about to get into the 'us vs them', 'chinese vs n american' standards, or anything else. All my guns shoot fine, without a gunsmith check. I no more expect to check the headspace, before I shoot, on a new Norinco, than I would on a new Remington. Unpack, clean and shoot If you're gunsmithing, changeing bolts and barrels, fill your boots. The owner of a NEW gun shouldn't have to worry about headspace.

I don't.
 
Brobee,
I've done a few of these myself. NEW Chinese receivers with GI barrels and a NEW GI Bolt run close to .308 Win GO [ 1.630" plus or minus a bit]

I have found that for a MATCH TARGET set up, I aim for 1.632". This is for a rifle to be shot with commercial MATCH grade .306 win ammo. I also find this measurement works well with all of the 7.62 Nato ball ammo I have shot through them.

The last time I built up a batch, iI used five NEW receivers, four GI barrels, and 5 brand new bolts. I spent a lot of time hand tightening the barrels, dropping in the bolts, and checking to see which parts worked best with which recivers. With the hand tightened barrels, you have to allow for the rotation and the draw to "guestimate" what you will end up with after they are torqued on.

Interestingly, the Chinese receivers varied tolerances less than the GI barrels and bolts. However, there was one Chinese receiver that would not go over 1.628" with any combination of parts. The fifth barrel was a Springfield armoury commercial Match heavy barrel, NON-chrome lined, which had to be reamed to size anyway, so this is the one I used for my Heavy barrel target.

I have a USGI 7.62 NTAO GO gauge, and it definitely is a bit different than the commercial .308 Win gauges. if you check with both, there is a difference.

If you need to borrow my 7.62 gauge for your project, let me know.

PS: Don't waste your time with ordering Custom oversize gauges ... I've seena couple that would swallow my .308 or 7.62 NATO gauges, PLUS a .025" feeler gauge. These were the ones with the soft left shoulders on the bolts, that peend back aftyer only a few rounds.
TTFB
good luck with your project
LAZ 1
 
Jason remember that a semi can stretch the brass upon extraction when fired I can only assume that you did not disable the Gas system for the test
 
Back
Top Bottom