mag issue on lee Enfield

the_snowman1

Regular
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
I bought a lee Enfield a couple months ago its a mark 4 no 1. I took it out shooting today and if I load 10 rounds in it I fired and the mag fell out I took 4 rounds out to make it 5 rounds in the magazine and fired and it was fine. I think my magazine release is worn has anyone else have a issue like this and is so what was the fix
 
Check the lips of the mag spine and mag release are sharp and not rounded. Also I give the mags a hard slap to mure sure it is seated right.
 
I bought a lee Enfield a couple months ago its a mark 4 no 1. I took it out shooting today and if I load 10 rounds in it I fired and the mag fell out I took 4 rounds out to make it 5 rounds in the magazine and fired and it was fine. I think my magazine release is worn has anyone else have a issue like this and is so what was the fix

Lee Enfields were not designed or intended to be fed with fresh mags every time.

They are supposed to be charger fed, and the mag left on the rifle.

That's why, typically, .303 ammo in bandoleers were in 5 round strippers.

Insert charged stripper into charger guard, reef down with thumb, repeat once more, = full mag.
 
The lee Enfield was one of the few rifles that had a magazine protruding under the rifle. The risk of this design is that a hit on the thin metal would deform the mag and ruin it.

The Mauser solution was to make it a 5 round internal mag. Garand went with 8 rounds internal.

Enfield went with 10 rounds, but made it easy to replace the mag, if it was damaged.

If a Ross mag is damaged, it is not a quick repair.
 
Check the lips of the mag spine and mag release are sharp and not rounded. Also I give the mags a hard slap to mure sure it is seated right.

This. The mag does need a good slap, especially if you're inserting it loaded. It wasn't designed to be removed often.
 
Is it legal to not pin your mag to 5 on these enfields for some reason?

mags design for bolt action rifle do not have a mag limit :), you do have to pin the mag or cut it to 5 rounds if your using it for hunting in NS, not sure elsewhere or not
 
Well, at the risk of seeming like a jackass, I will reiterate a few things which already have been said.

The Lee-Enfield rifle was NEVER designed to have Magazines "slapped in" and dropped out. You're not dealing with an AK-47; you are dealing with a high-quality rifle. In the case of a Number 4, you are dealing with a Rifle which cost 1.7 ounces of Gold to manufacture: that is $2550 in today's money. The Government PAID for quality and they GOT it.

Lee-Enfield Magazines were individually hand-fitted to the rifles; the majority of them were actually hand-MADE.

The Magazine was to be removed, empty, ONLY for maintenance and cleaning of the Rifle. At ALL other times, the Magazine was to be left fixed firmly in place.

LOADING was to be accomplished with Chargers, each Charger holding 5 rounds and stripped into the Magazine on the Rifle. It is actually much FASTER to load the Rifle with Chargers than it is to fumble about with attempting to jam a Magazine into place while the Cartridges try to spread themselves across the landscape. Chargers are to be loaded DUDUD: Down-Up-Down-Up-Down: _-_-_. This is the ONLY way they work properly.

I know that this is now the Twenty-first Century and we have the INTERNET and all that, but the Lee-Enfield Rifle does not understand the concept of "rule by common consent", not does it understand "popular democracy" nor "Internet lore". It understands the MANUAL.

People should attempt READING the Manual before airing their problems which stem from their having NOT read it.
 
"...legal to not pin your mag to 5..." Specifically exempt by name.
"... a No1 MK3 magazine..." My thought too. Lots of No. 4's were sold with the wrong mag. A No. 4 mag has one locking lug on the back of the mag. A No. 1 Mk III mag has two.
 
"...legal to not pin your mag to 5..." Specifically exempt by name.
"... a No1 MK3 magazine..." My thought too. Lots of No. 4's were sold with the wrong mag. A No. 4 mag has one locking lug on the back of the mag. A No. 1 Mk III mag has two.

Specifically exempt by name, which highlights the stupidity of those that wrote the legislation as the Enfield is a manual action rifle and therefor needs no excemption to mag capacity as there are no limits to manual action rifles.
 
well, at the risk of seeming like a jackass, i will reiterate a few things which already have been said.

The lee-enfield rifle was never designed to have magazines "slapped in" and dropped out. You're not dealing with an ak-47; you are dealing with a high-quality rifle. In the case of a number 4, you are dealing with a rifle which cost 1.7 ounces of gold to manufacture: That is $2550 in today's money. The government paid for quality and they got it.

Lee-enfield magazines were individually hand-fitted to the rifles; the majority of them were actually hand-made.

The magazine was to be removed, empty, only for maintenance and cleaning of the rifle. At all other times, the magazine was to be left fixed firmly in place.

Loading was to be accomplished with chargers, each charger holding 5 rounds and stripped into the magazine on the rifle. It is actually much faster to load the rifle with chargers than it is to fumble about with attempting to jam a magazine into place while the cartridges try to spread themselves across the landscape. Chargers are to be loaded dudud: Down-up-down-up-down: _-_-_. This is the only way they work properly.

I know that this is now the twenty-first century and we have the internet and all that, but the lee-enfield rifle does not understand the concept of "rule by common consent", not does it understand "popular democracy" nor "internet lore". It understands the manual.

People should attempt reading the manual before airing their problems which stem from their having not read it.

x 2
 
Back
Top Bottom