Mag panic buy situation

[Johnyy]

what would it take for you to not comply?

His 'next' Big story.

 

[Cdnhunter117]

ive owned firearms only for 1 year and very upset with bill c21, although own nothing on OIC. that saying even if they banned bolt action .22 id give it up. have no interest in breaking laws no matter how stupid they are

Seeing as your .22 is a tool in your personal property, what about if they took your toolbox and your tv or you're a criminal? See what I mean? As someone else stated, it's no wonder we are where we are. Imagine if you were part of the many of us who didn't comply and you didn't have to feel ashamed for standing up against criminals for your property rights. That would be pretty cool.

 

[messier82]

If this magazine ban comes into effect, does anyone know if 10/10 cross industries pistol mags will be legal to use in semi-auto rifles?

 

[Alfonso]

Thanks John. I appreciate it. I hope you are well.

 

[Alfonso]

Hey Alfonso,

We have known each other for years. I for one know you are a straight shooter.

The bottom line is ignore all this bullsh1t and enjoy your shooting sport.

Stop worrying about any of this Liberal posturing, it means nothing!......

Go shoot your irons and enjoy.

You may want to take that F@CK Trudeau bumper sticker off your car, Hahahhahahah, just joking.

Take care brother.

John

Ha ha. Thanks John I appreciate your comments. I hope you are well.

 

[guysavard]

.

 

[NSS]

Some of these comments are quite sad. I really pity those that see firearm rights and many other rights as privileges. I see firearm ownership as a right and responsibility and I have a duty to preserve, even if not in my power, the very idea and concept of these basic rights. I have a duty to both aid and protect my family, friends community and any other sphere of humanity and rights. I do appreciate the honesty shared, however cowardly it sounds to me.

I encourage others to study history and to really delve into where rights come from.

We are in Canada, so firearms are not part of our rights. We have a long history of gun control laws, increasingly restrictive. That's about it...

Governments since Confederation have worded laws that indicate firearm possession is a privilege that is regulated and licensed, along the lines of owning a vehicle.

Good summary on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firearms_regulation_in_Canada

 

[guysavard]

.

 

[SustainingGopher]

We are in Canada, so firearms are not part of our rights.

I guess that depends on if you consider ‘rights’ to be that in which the government grants you.

 

[Shorerider]

We don’t have rights in Canada. We have some privileges awarded to us by the government. Some are just granted and others you need to apply for a special permit to do. Covid demonstrated the power the government really holds. They revoked almost every privilege we have and made you get an experimental drug to get a permit to have some of them back. For people that think Canada is free you’re sorely mistaken. We still live under crown rule. We are all serfs.

 

[Elkslayer45]

This ^

 

[NSS]

Sad but true. We don’t even own mineral rights on our property, the government can come and take it if they please. Surface access is all you own.

 

[FatCatsDad]

Waiting for some comedy the sovereign citizen crowdto pipe up with their useless drivel on this matter

 

[geologist]

Sad but true. We don’t even own mineral rights on our property, the government can come and take it if they please. Surface access is all you own.

Same with the timber rights.

 

[Cocked&Locked]

We are in Canada, so firearms are not part of our rights.

The difference between you and many of us is that we don't recognize the criminal government here as legitimate any longer.
We have gun rights regardless of this corrupt government trying to infringe on these rights.

 

[guysavard]

.

 

[NSS]

Waiting for some comedy the sovereign citizen crowdto pipe up with their useless drivel on this matter

You called it lol

 

[NSS]

Same with the timber rights.

Interesting, I was not aware of that. Thanks for sharing

 

[JACKSMYDOG]

"Rights" are man-made construct to make people feel safer. The only rights we enjoy are granted us under local law, and subject to revocation at anytime by the same powers that granted them.

For those that believe in rights granted via higher power, or other premise (god given, natural law, inalienable, or other descriptive term) unless you can point to a source specifying those rights, which will also protect those rights, or protect you from prosecution for acting on those rights, they are a nothing burger. Natural law is simply: the strongest survive. The only right you have is free will to fight, defend, and take what you want. That basis for society ended when we congregated and agreed to structured, governed lives, living under rule of law.

Without pointing to a higher power which gave us and enforces rights, all rights are man made and as such self defined by the individual which makes them no more important than the next person's self appointed rights. By application rights are only what we can enforce without prosecution.

 

[KDW__]

The idea of inalienable rights or human rights is pretty ridiculous. Rights only exist when backed by force.
In the case of of a government dictating to us what our rights are because they have force behind them, or a citizenship deciding what their rights are and being able to enforce said rights with violence. The ideal situation is really for a well armed government to protect us as a whole but a well armed civilian population to keep the government from becoming tyrannical.