Before the tests were completed Sig was awarded the contract. That's a fact. Check it. Glock's appeal centered on that fact. There were other irregularities that Glock brought up on appeal but were ignored.
The Army issued directives about modularity knowing full well that that ability would never be used. Only used to exclude.
Technical issues & mistakes ensured the Army chose the Sig beforehand. All these issues are documented in the reports & appeals. Not "subjective" but factual. Where's your faux facts?
That may be true. Potentially the main reason could center around d SIG now being a complete US company since moving SIG from Germany. Glock still has its heart in Austria, politically and financially its smart to keep that money in country.
Also, The glock premiered in the early 80s where as The p320 is new 'tech'. Yes they are both striker fired but when you look at specs, it's probably an easy sell to say you bought the latest and greatest and can expect 30 years from this product.
I'm a glock guy, but I really enjoy my p320 too.


















































