Mark X mauser scope mount options

kferguson

CGN Regular
Rating - 100%
154   0   0
I have a lovely Mark X Mauser in .375 HH. It came with a Leupold 1.5 - 5 but in Weaver rings and bases. It works but it is pretty plebian. Can any of suggest a better mount option, taking into account that this kicks at both ends.. It has a round top action

Thanks in advance for your help. Kevin
 
I have a lovely Mark X Mauser in .375 HH. It came with a Leupold 1.5 - 5 but in Weaver rings and bases. It works but it is pretty plebian. Can any of suggest a better mount option, taking into account that this kicks at both ends.. It has a round top action

Thanks in advance for your help. Kevin
I generally use Leupold/Redfield style bases on my Mausers. With Burris insert rings. - dan
 
For a solid set up I would prefer Leupold Dual Dovetail rings and bases... once installed it is trouble free and will handle recoil better than Leupold windage adjustable rear ring. I have seen several of those with the clamping notch on the rear ring broken out from recoil.
 
I agree with the OP's designation of Weaver rings & bases as plebeian.

plebeian /plĭ-bē′ən/

adjective​

3. Unrefined or coarse in nature or manner; common or vulgar.
"plebeian tastes."

As opposed to say the Recknagel QR, EAW's Claw-mounts, their Magnum fixed mount, EAW Blueline, EAW Model 365 rings or their Model 190 slide-off, the MAKuick QR lever among many others.
 
I agree with the OP's designation of Weaver rings & bases as plebeian.

plebeian /plĭ-bē′ən/

adjective​

3. Unrefined or coarse in nature or manner; common or vulgar.
"plebeian tastes."

As opposed to say the Recknagel QR, EAW's Claw-mounts, their Magnum fixed mount, EAW Blueline, EAW Model 365 rings or their Model 190 slide-off, the MAKuick QR lever among many others.
I like Weaver R&B. Have used them on 3 or 4 375s without any issue at all.

Does that make me a pleb? :)
 
Not unless you see yourself as being no different, or of the same value, as the things you use.

Most people do not see themselves as a tool, even though they use a screwdriver.

The problem I've had with Weaver bases is that the screws usually have to be trimmed and quite often the bases shimmed. With Warne bases, I have yet to have to trim screws or shim bases.
 
I like Weaver R&B. Have used them on 3 or 4 375s without any issue at all.
Does that make me a pleb? :)
Lol, yep...or at the very least, you have plebian tastes! :)

I like a lot of things about Weavers. They seem to hold as well as anything on the market; they're cheap...not merely inexpensive, but also cheap...and they actually can be removed and replaced with pretty decent return-to-zero. IMHO their main appeal is that, as ugly as they are, they look right on some rifles. An older, well-worn, gloss-blued rifle seems just right for them, and they for it. But even on those guns I'd prefer one of the old STD-style set-ups made by Leupold, Redfield or Burris; those are another highly over-rated system from the good ol' days that also have the right "look".

But if, like me, you are constantly playing musical scopes as you mix and match to find those elusive perfect scope/rifle pairings...Weavers are a major PITA. Tightening down the upper straps on the rings inevitably causes the scope to rotate slightly towards the screws, and the art of starting off with the scope slightly rotated in the opposite direction to counteract this is something I have never mastered; there's always a lot of tightening, loosening, re-tightening, re-loosening, re-re-tightening, etc. before I get them juuuust right.

OP, your gun sounds like a nice one; more importantly, your description of it as "lovely" implies that you want something nice for scope rings. The Weavers ain't it. :)
 
Back
Top Bottom