I have looked at a couple new marlin 45-70s lately and noticed when the lever was fully closed the bolt was not flush with the back of the reciever. Is this the norm on new marlins? Also wood to metal edges were pretty bad. I had heard quality was improving but the fit finish on these was pretty bad. Are all the models as bad? I was thinking of ordering a 1895 sbl but after seeing a new guide gun not so sure.
I have this same rifle. Picked it up off the EE from a fellow CGN'er about a year ago. It's a 2012 Marlington but it's an awesome piece of gear. I asked for lots of pic's and he even sent me video before I made my mind up as he was on the other side of the country. Great purchase exp, very happy.
Like I said, I love this rifle and it's one of my many fav's! However if I were to rate this particular rifle's F/F, it would get an over all B- , this I understand to be one of the "better" ones of the era.
CON's: The stock could be about 1/16" tighter to the receiver and the innards could use a good polishing. Also, as for the bolt, is seems to be slightly protruding but maybe only 1/32" or less. Basically all of it is nothing that an hour or so by a skillful hand wouldn't cure.
PRO's: Otherwise this unit is a very powerful 'stopping' rifle and surprisingly very accurate out to about 200+m with a scope (and some practice

) But the iron sights are great! Take out a pop can at 100m no prob!

. Aesthetically these are beautiful guns and always draw attention especially from them 'thar lady folk! I would say best to be buyer beware, if you find one and it's not JM stamped (if it is buy it, start the car and get out of there! Hens teeth I tell ya!) then just check it out every way you can before you buy. FYI: the vids with sound and the seller cycling the action, showing close ups of the whole thing really worked for me.
This way I'm sure you will find one of these great Gvn't lead slingers to add to your collection.
Good luck!