MDT LSS chassis opinion.

[JasonYuke]

First off I must say MDT offered excellent service good communications and was a pleasure to deal with.

Second off has anyone used these. I bought one with no real field knowledge for my 300 whisper project.

What do you think of the LSS. ?

Thanks

 

[tiriaq]

I really like mine.

 

[Jamie]

I think the LSS is better then the TAC21 in many ways
And it is now my number one grab and go truck/bush gun in 223

 

[samsplacci71]

Been considering getting the LSS for my Remington 700.

 

[2bad4u2]

While I don't own one, I think it would be a good choice if you were considering a short barreled rifle. It would be very handy, compact, and relatively light weight.

If MDT gets around to offering one for a Howa 1500/Weatherby Vanguard action, they'll make a sale to me.

 

[chalkriver]

I put my SPS Tactical with 20in barrel , CTR buttstock with a 1/4 in riser then went to a 3/4 in riser .
I really mine and it was a good deal as well when you think of the cost of converting to a detachable magazine .


pic with 1/4 riser on the buttstock

 

[Jamie]

MDT need to make a Folder for the LSS

 

[swissinn]

Are these compatible with the new savage trigger guard bolt release? I have one of the 10 TR LEO on order and I think it would be sweet in this chassis.

 

[JasonYuke]

Nice stuff guys. I can't wait to get mine in that chassis.

Should serve the purpose well.

 

[tiriaq]

Experimenting, I've assembled mine with two different barrelled actions. First, with a 20" .223 LTR barrel, second with a 22" .243 sporting weight barrel. Two entirely different rifles!

 

[nbmonte]

I put my SPS Tactical with 20in barrel , CTR buttstock with a 1/4 in riser then went to a 3/4 in riser

How do you like it with the ctr? How well do the risers work? I'm on the fence about a lss, I'm concerned with the cheek weld.

 

[JasonYuke]

I am going with the 16.5 inch. Hoping not to shorts guys. ? With a break will add. 1-2 inches.

300 aac has a pretty heavy contour so should look beefy short. ?

 

[2bad4u2]

I am going with the 16.5 inch. Hoping not to shorts guys. ? With a break will add. 1-2 inches.

300 aac has a pretty heavy contour so should look beefy short. ?

It's a standard Remington varmint contour is it not? Shouldn't be too heavy at 16.5".

 

[JasonYuke]

It's a standard Remington varmint contour is it not? Shouldn't be too heavy at 16.5".

10-4. I believe it is

Just looks beefy in a shorty. I put the caliper on it same hb contour as the rest

What I did not realize is the AAC is 5r rifling maybe all the tactical rem are now ? I don't know

 

[Fyn]

I'm very happy with mine. I went with a 26" heavy barrel on my Savage build, and the stock does a great job at offsetting the weight (obviously a little unbalanced, but not an issue for my uses). Fit and finish is great, very happy with the product overall. I'm considering doing another one in a short/lightweight package.

 

[2bad4u2]

I'm considering doing another one in a short/lightweight package.

Makes sense, seeing how that's what it was designed for.

 

[Fyn]

Makes sense, seeing how that's what it was designed for.

I feel it's a good option for those of us who don't need or want a bunch of rails and extra weight, regardless of the barrel length/weight, especially at the price point.

 

[ActiveShooter]

I like mine. Perfect with the 16.5" AAC

 

[gunpro]

I put one onto a Rem 700 with an 18" 260 barrel for my 11 year old son. Bonus is that in the short version it fits him, and when I stretch it out, dad can use it to. Looking to swap out the Choate on my 223 to make a more compact coyote rig.

 

[JasonYuke]

Looks great. Like how beefy it looks