Anyone have any experience with the NP762 and Mil surplus ammo? I remember reading something about the NP762 not "liking" the hard primers.
Thanks!!!
I've heard the stories about 762 not liking Mil surplus, but mine DA eats everything.
Anyone have any experience with the NP762 and Mil surplus ammo? I remember reading something about the NP762 not "liking" the hard primers.
Thanks!!!
Thanks for the info on MilSurp ammo in the NP762. Since I have 3 crates of 7.62X25 MilSurp, I guess I'll stick to burning it off with my TT-33 and M-57. They shoot it flawlessly.
![]()
Any reason for preferring the 7.62 over the 9mm ?
Wish I can see same Norico 1911 sights on 9 mm model, I will get one if there is any.
So, whats "new" about the 1911 ?
Snaps more. 7.62x25 would be more comparable to 357sig. Or 40sw. Or 45acp. It's a "bigger" calibre.
And there's surplus to be had if you don't reload. But even surplus will cost you as much if not more than 9mm these days. Definitely less than 45acp, and a LOT less than 357sig.
Technically its a smaller caliber...
The 7.62x25 shoots a smaller, lighter bullet at higher velocities - 30cal 85-90gr bullets at 1500fps, vs 115-124gr at 1150fps, give or take. The differences in weight and velocity lead to differences in the way the recoil is felt by the shooter.
I always thought the 7.65x25 would be a fantastic short range small game cartridge if a reasonably accurate little rifle was made to go with it...
So, whats "new" about the 1911 ?
probably until its over
Nice.
One day I hope for a Norinco commander 9mm with a Picatinny rail.
The extended slide and mag release were on the last model. The only new thing I see is adjustable rear sight, and no more fibre optic front sight.
Thanks for the info on MilSurp ammo in the NP762. Since I have 3 crates of 7.62X25 MilSurp, I guess I'll stick to burning it off with my TT-33 and M-57. They shoot it flawlessly.
![]()