Merged. Franklin Armory Binary Firing System
- Thread starter Stoner99
- Start date
- Location
- South Ontario
Probably not legal in no fun land aka Canada
http://franklin-armory.myshopify.com/collections/triggers/products/binary-firing-system-trigger-pack
MSRP $399.99
{PART 4 Prohibited Devices
Former Prohibited Weapons Order, No. 9
1) Any electrical or mechanical device that is designed or adapted to operate the trigger mechanism of a semi-automatic firearm for the purpose of causing the firearm to discharge cartridges in rapid succession.}
MSRP $399.99
{PART 4 Prohibited Devices
Former Prohibited Weapons Order, No. 9
1) Any electrical or mechanical device that is designed or adapted to operate the trigger mechanism of a semi-automatic firearm for the purpose of causing the firearm to discharge cartridges in rapid succession.}
DeadlyKamikazy
CGN Regular
- Location
- Vancouver Island
2 rounds per pull of the trigger...
a) Prohib in Canada, without a question.
b) Don't care anyway. It looks too easy to screw up, leaving a live round in the chamber with the hammer down (and that's a very bad thing). And I am un-fond of the concept of a gun that fires when you both depress AND release the trigger. That strikes me as a safety issue waiting to happen.
b) Don't care anyway. It looks too easy to screw up, leaving a live round in the chamber with the hammer down (and that's a very bad thing). And I am un-fond of the concept of a gun that fires when you both depress AND release the trigger. That strikes me as a safety issue waiting to happen.
- Location
- On a resonably direct route in NS
Criminal Code, Section 84(1):
The Firearms Lab. would try to argue that releasing the trigger is inherent in pressing the trigger, but I disagree; that would be a cycle, not a pressure.
If it only fires one round when the trigger is pressed, and you can hold it back without bouncing off another (*bump*), that to me meets the definition of ‘during one pressure.’
(N.b., I would consider such a device to be rather un-safe, unless it has a quick way to dis-engage the second hammer fall. Even then, it would be a range-only toy, and I would recommend a lot of practice to become familiar.)
Automatic firearm means a firearm that is capable of, or assembled or designed and manufactured with the capability of, discharging projectiles in rapid succession during one pressure of the trigger.
The Firearms Lab. would try to argue that releasing the trigger is inherent in pressing the trigger, but I disagree; that would be a cycle, not a pressure.
If it only fires one round when the trigger is pressed, and you can hold it back without bouncing off another (*bump*), that to me meets the definition of ‘during one pressure.’
(N.b., I would consider such a device to be rather un-safe, unless it has a quick way to dis-engage the second hammer fall. Even then, it would be a range-only toy, and I would recommend a lot of practice to become familiar.)
Last edited:
This.
A complete cycle requires releasing the trigger. You can't pull it and then pull it again without releasing it. Thus two rounds per pull. That would be a fairly simple bit of logic for the RCMP.
SwL_Wildcat
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
When you release the trigger you want to stop firing, not fire another round. Say you have the trigger trapped back after making a shot and the situations dynamic has changes to where it is no longer safe to fire a round. Now what? I would have to agree with it not being a very safe item to have on a firearm.
Check the video, the hammer is held back by the disconnector as in a normal semi-auto. The range-toy discussion is irrelevant as it's for an AR-15 which *is* a range-only toy anyway. I could see a definitive advantage in 3-gun or CQB / IPSC type match.
- Location
- East of Home, West of the Rest
Hold trigger back. Drop mag. Cycle action.
SwL_Wildcat
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Yeah, I get it. But you are doing a 1 handed weapon manipulation with a live round in the chamber and the trigger depressed. Most guys that have a bit of training could pull it off without incident, but then you have the others... High probability of a ND in my eyes.
Would be fun for an hour then I'd probably never use it again unless I was letting someone else try it.
I don't want to go through ammo any faster than I do already. Would also be a total waste of money with our five round magazine capacity limits, even with ten rounds it would be ghay.
Guaranteed this is prohib here and therefore not worth worrying too much about.
I'm not sure why so many people try so hard to find a way to shoot full auto. You can't hit much and it's really hard on your rifle and wallet.
Don't get me wrong though, with proper training and maybe a special condition added to your RPAL I think we should be allowed to own and use full auto firearms at and away from the range. In my head a gun is a gun and if it's safe for me to own one I should be allowed to own any. The restricted firearms only at a range is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. If it's safe for me to use one firearm on crown or private land it should be safe to use any other firearm there as well.
I don't want to go through ammo any faster than I do already. Would also be a total waste of money with our five round magazine capacity limits, even with ten rounds it would be ghay.
Guaranteed this is prohib here and therefore not worth worrying too much about.
I'm not sure why so many people try so hard to find a way to shoot full auto. You can't hit much and it's really hard on your rifle and wallet.
Don't get me wrong though, with proper training and maybe a special condition added to your RPAL I think we should be allowed to own and use full auto firearms at and away from the range. In my head a gun is a gun and if it's safe for me to own one I should be allowed to own any. The restricted firearms only at a range is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. If it's safe for me to use one firearm on crown or private land it should be safe to use any other firearm there as well.
