MG 42 Deactivated

Mr Wolverine

Mr Wolverine

CGN Regular
Location
Manitoba. Canada
I have two MG 42 for sale. I have to deactivate them but should be ready to go after Christmas. All de activated guns are sold "As Is" no returns. E-mail me for detailed photos, no PM please. Sold for cash, no tax, need to boost my "Africa fund". One gun is missing the grip panels but otherwise all are complete and original.

To comply with current standards barrel and trigger group will be welded in place, bolt face ground off, butt welded to receiver . Bolt will retract but no sear so can,t #### and click. Top cover will open, feed pawls present.

I have these two for sale $3,400.00 and $3,500.00, photos show before deactivation. Sold “As Is” no returns, private sale pay with MO no tax.

IMG_1801_zps4a4b593c.jpg


IMG_1802_zps6c400900.jpg


IMG_1804_zps63f42c50.jpg
 
Last edited:
Please don't. Dont do this. Please.
Start some kind of non profit donation to keep them alive:

Send 5 dollar dollars or else the mg42 gets it.
 
It should not come to this. Don't deactivate these guns. That is what the designers of Bill C-68 want.
 
Robert777 said:
It should not come to this. Don't deactivate these guns. That is what the designers of Bill C-68 want.
Click to expand...

send him $3200 X 3 and he will keep them all for future change in legislation :)
he wants to enjoy his firearms activities (hunting in africa) while time is on his side, and within the lame firearms laws existing today...why should he suffer and hang on to them instead of do what he enjoys.
 
Robert777 said:
It should not come to this. Don't deactivate these guns. That is what the designers of Bill C-68 want.
Click to expand...

Avalonthas said:
and within the lame firearms laws existing today...why should he suffer and hang on to them instead of do what he enjoys.
Click to expand...

It is attitudes like that which is why we have the nonsense we have now. It's the me me me attitude, and if the banning of this or that doesn't directly affect me I'm not going to do anything about it. If Canadian gun owners had of stuck together instead of letting only a few do the fighting, there would be NO Firearms Act as created under that Bill C-68, there would be no prohibited class of handguns (which made some great guns valueless), and other things could have then been accomplished like handgun hunting would exist again, the AR Platform would not be restricted and you could still hunt with your AR or your AK for that matter. This is not a slam on Wolverine as he and they have done their fair share to fight the good fight, but about the rest of the whiners and complainers out there. I think it was 12 or so fellows that made it out to the Toronto meeting to fight Adam Vaughn. TWELVE!!! And over half of those guys were from out of town, and that whole movement has died down to only a couple of us still working on stuff.

A guy I knew a few years ago was telling me that a nice rifle he had was later deemed prohibited and the York Regional Police came to confiscate it. He told me that his rifle went into service with the department. I asked him why did he allow them to take his gun? He said because he had a house and a family. What kind of example is that to set for ones children, that it is O.K. for armed men to come into your home and steal your legally purchased property and then get to use it for free? If he was unable to stand up and not give in, then he should have at least made it a useless piece of inoperative junk. Our great great grandfathers would kick us in the nuts for the slack jawed sheep we have become in Canada.
 
Tuco Pike said:
It is attitudes like that which is why we have the nonsense we have now. It's the me me me attitude, and if the banning of this or that doesn't directly affect me I'm not going to do anything about it. If Canadian gun owners had of stuck together instead of letting only a few do the fighting, there would be NO Firearms Act as created under that Bill C-68, there would be no prohibited class of handguns (which made some great guns valueless), and other things could have then been accomplished like handgun hunting would exist again, the AR Platform would not be restricted and you could still hunt with your AR or your AK for that matter. This is not a slam on Wolverine as he and they have done their fair share to fight the good fight, but about the rest of the whiners and complainers out there. I think it was 12 or so fellows that made it out to the Toronto meeting to fight Adam Vaughn. TWELVE!!! And over half of those guys were from out of town, and that whole movement has died down to only a couple of us still working on stuff.

A guy I knew a few years ago was telling me that a nice rifle he had was later deemed prohibited and the York Regional Police came to confiscate it. He told me that his rifle went into service with the department. I asked him why did he allow them to take his gun? He said because he had a house and a family. What kind of example is that to set for ones children, that it is O.K. for armed men to come into your home and steal your legally purchased property and then get to use it for free? If he was unable to stand up and not give in, then he should have at least made it a useless piece of inoperative junk. Our great great grandfathers would kick us in the nuts for the slack jawed sheep we have become in Canada.
Click to expand...
Does anybody else see the irony in this ? Your train of thought has derailed my friend................
 
Tuco Pike said:
It is attitudes like that which is why we have the nonsense we have now. It's the me me me attitude, and if the banning of this or that doesn't directly affect me I'm not going to do anything about it. If Canadian gun owners had of stuck together instead of letting only a few do the fighting, there would be NO Firearms Act as created under that Bill C-68, there would be no prohibited class of handguns (which made some great guns valueless), and other things could have then been accomplished like handgun hunting would exist again, the AR Platform would not be restricted and you could still hunt with your AR or your AK for that matter. This is not a slam on Wolverine as he and they have done their fair share to fight the good fight, but about the rest of the whiners and complainers out there. I think it was 12 or so fellows that made it out to the Toronto meeting to fight Adam Vaughn. TWELVE!!! And over half of those guys were from out of town, and that whole movement has died down to only a couple of us still working on stuff.

A guy I knew a few years ago was telling me that a nice rifle he had was later deemed prohibited and the York Regional Police came to confiscate it. He told me that his rifle went into service with the department. I asked him why did he allow them to take his gun? He said because he had a house and a family. What kind of example is that to set for ones children, that it is O.K. for armed men to come into your home and steal your legally purchased property and then get to use it for free? If he was unable to stand up and not give in, then he should have at least made it a useless piece of inoperative junk. Our great great grandfathers would kick us in the nuts for the slack jawed sheep we have become in Canada.
Click to expand...

Well said. I too would choose deactivation over out right theft.
 
Kelvin said:
Can they be converted to semi-auto only?
Click to expand...

NO! In Canada, 'once a auto, ALWAYS an auto'... So you can't buy it & convert it... Then it'd be a CONVERTED AUTO, yet another 'class'...

Don't try to understand the logic, it will make your head hurt.

Cheers
Jay
 
Jay said:
NO! In Canada, 'once a auto, ALWAYS an auto'... So you can't buy it & convert it... Then it'd be a CONVERTED AUTO, yet another 'class'...

Don't try to understand the logic, it will make your head hurt.

Cheers
Jay
Click to expand...

Jay is correct, these can only be sold deactivated, that is the Canadian law!
 
The owner is free to do as he wishes with his property. But here is my question on this is it not possible to figure out a means to make a NEW semi auto receiver, strip out all the donour parts from the FA guns and give the guns a new lease on life ?? The guns are here in Canada so there are no crossing borders/importation issues, we have some VERY capable people in Canada at this sort of thing. Then take the stripped FA receiver and make that "dewatted" or just destory it. If they could be made into semi NR that, to me, would be better then then dewating them. Sadly way down the road I see everything getting dewatted thanks to our crazy laws. Not even sure if its "doable" just seems worth trying if one had the skills and knowledge and equipment to make it happen.
 
XRCD011 said:
The owner is free to do as he wishes with his property. But here is my question on this is it not possible to figure out a means to make a NEW semi auto receiver, strip out all the donour parts from the FA guns and give the guns a new lease on life ?? The guns are here in Canada so there are no crossing borders/importation issues, we have some VERY capable people in Canada at this sort of thing. Then take the stripped FA receiver and make that "dewatted" or just destory it. If they could be made into semi NR that, to me, would be better then then dewating them. Sadly way down the road I see everything getting dewatted thanks to our crazy laws. Not even sure if its "doable" just seems worth trying if one had the skills and knowledge and equipment to make it happen.
Click to expand...

A good idea but simply not cost effective for the small number of guns involved. Anything can be made if price is no object, remember also the "wild card" is the Government, they can always change the rules. It is like being at school playing games with a bully, every time you think you are winning the bully changes the rules!
 
WHAT?? They are deactivated??? Who dares to do this? How could you do this??? They are made of love and you just kill them....

PS: Too bad wish i had the class 12.2
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom