I don't comment on things on this forum much anymore, it's just to retarded to sit here bantering back and forth with all the absolutely un-informed people who think they know what there talking about.
This statement above shows just how unbelievable some of the advice you can receive on CGN really is, this guy proudly claims "That's what i did" in regards to spending 3.5GRAND++

on his Mini-14 and a bunch of imported magazines!!! UN FREAKIN BELIEVABLE
Well...my perspective is that a semi-auto rifle is pretty much useless without a stack of decent magazines to feed it, and my point was to simply illustrate the fact (not opinion) that for the bare-bones price of a new swiss arms rifle with two factory magazines, you can have a mini with a massive pile of magazines. To do the same thing in the swiss arms department looks something like this:
$3400 - Cost of new Swiss Arms Classic Green$
$2100 - Cost of 30 factory 5/20 magazines @ $70 each
--------
$5500 - total Swiss Arms Investment for high round count shooter
vs
$800 - Cost of new mini-14
$2100 - Cost of 30 factory 5/20 magazines @ $60 each plus 300 for import/shipping
------
$2900 - Total Mini-14 investment for high round count shooter
Granted the example is a little extreme, as there are other somewhat less expensive options that use more readily available AR15 style magazines, but the spirit of the comparison is, IMHO, fair.
Another thing that's worth exploring is the notion that what is important for some people may not be what's important to others. If what's important to you is a non-restricted semi-auto rifle that can consistently hammer out at MOA from a supported prone position, then I would agree that the swiss rifle is greatly superior to the mini. If you have the same objective (MOA from prone position) but don't care about restricted status, then my opinion is that you are better served with an AR15 type rifle. If your objective it to have a light, quick handling utility rifle to shoot 100, 200 or 300 meter steel silhouettes in a practical rifle type setting, my opinion is that the VZ and the mini style rifles equally as good as the swiss rifles, and a heck of a lot better value. How about as a rifle to teach new shooters basic handling and practical marksmanship principles with a centerfire rifle at 25 yards? How about hunting? Here in Alberta I can't hunt big game with a swiss arms rifle, but I can hunt with my mini-30 (as well as VZ style rifle).
Regarding your comments on reliability, my experience is that all of the higher dollar guns can have issues too. My very first Colt 6820 AR15 broke within the first 500 rounds when the gas key sheared off the bolt (faulty fasteners) and gouged the cr*p out of the interior of the upper. I've had a swiss arms rifle where the recoil spring was damaged when the retaining pin on the piston broke (around the 2000 round mark). With the Colt rifle I had to get a completely new rifle which took 3 to 4 months. With the Swiss Rifle I wound up waiting about 6 months for new parts. My AR180B broke at the front pivot point and was a nightmare to get replaced. I have not been shooting the VZ rifles long enough to have developed my own experienced opinion, however there is lots of ancedotal stories on the dreaded "gremlin", so my perspective is that they can all have issues. But my personal experience with the half a dozen or so mini-s I've run hard has been pretty positive, so therefore my opinion is that they are decent value in terms of reliability. Sounds like your experience has been different though.
Anyway, my interpretation of the original poster's intent was to poll others who have first hand experience with both the mini as well as other "black" rifles for their comparative experience between the various rifles. Everything I've written is just my opinion and likely not worth much more that you paid for it. I don't think less of you for having a different opinion, however I do consider that when you argue ad hominem it does nothing to strengthen the persuasiveness of your position.
Cheers,
Brobee