Mixing different lots of the same powder together.

mossyhorns

CGN Regular
Rating - 100%
11   0   0
Folks, although I've been reloading for over 20 years I've never actually done this. While organizing my powders last night I discovered several partial containers of the same powders but in different lot numbers. As powder containers are mostly air anyway I would sure save a lot of space by combining them.

Is there that much difference between lot numbers? Has anyone done this?

I load for hunting only.

Cheers.

Mossyhorns
 
I actually did this already not thinking. Put half a pound of varget into a 8 pound jug of different lot number. 300 rounds later similar accuracy and such. Didn't see a single difference. I've probably mixed lot numbers just refilling the charge master then dumping it with mixed lot numbers.
 
Folks, although I've been reloading for over 20 years I've never actually done this. While organizing my powders last night I discovered several partial containers of the same powders but in different lot numbers. As powder containers are mostly air anyway I would sure save a lot of space by combining them.

Is there that much difference between lot numbers? Has anyone done this?

I load for hunting only.

Cheers.

Mossyhorns

According to Hodgdon Powder they allow for up to a 16% variation in density for any particular powder. So, first I would measure each lot using the same volume measure and compare the densities. If they are reasonably close, I would do it.

On a side note, I ran into a situation where there was a significant difference in density of the powder in the same container. It was an 8lb jug and the powder on top was close to 10% less dense than the powder underneath. Now I shake up all powders before decanting to the measure and checking density.

So depending on how close to the edge you are, mixing different lots might not be a big thing or it could be a very big thing. Only you can decide what you're willing to risk.
 
Not knowing the age of each can, I would assemble 3 to 5 rounds with each powder and run them to the chronograph. If they measure the same (density) and read the same (velocity), mix away!

I would not mix if the volume is different for a given weight. Time may have added weight (humidity) to the an unsealed can.
 
According to Hodgdon Powder they allow for up to a 16% variation in density for any particular powder. So, first I would measure each lot using the same volume measure and compare the densities. If they are reasonably close, I would do it.

On a side note, I ran into a situation where there was a significant difference in density of the powder in the same container. It was an 8lb jug and the powder on top was close to 10% less dense than the powder underneath. Now I shake up all powders before decanting to the measure and checking density.

So depending on how close to the edge you are, mixing different lots might not be a big thing or it could be a very big thing. Only you can decide what you're willing to risk.

So you are saying, if you weigh each load (like I do), then there is minimal difference? But yet if you use a powder thrower you should probably double check weights more if you mix lot numbers. Or not mix at all?
 
So you are saying, if you weigh each load (like I do), then there is minimal difference? But yet if you use a powder thrower you should probably double check weights more if you mix lot numbers. Or not mix at all?

Yes. If you weigh each individual charge for say precision rifle loads, I don't foresee a problem. But if using a volume measure for cranking out target loads or the like, I would be careful to verify the charge weights.

Again, as long as the various lots are reasonably close in density, I would have no problem mixing them. But I would be leery of stuff that was way different.
 
I do it when a container is near empty; I just pour the little that's left into a full new container and continue on my way.

Same here, it wasn't until last week that anything weird happened. And I have no explanation as to how it happened. But knowing that it can, taking a few seconds to shake up and mix the contents is not a big deal.
 
I do this all the time. I take various jugs and drums of powder (typically 4895) and mix them all together in a clean garbage can, so I get 40 pounds of homogeneous powder of one (new) lot number, instead of 4 or five small and different lots.

There can be a substantial variation between a new jug of powder and old powder. I have a couple of drums of military surplus 4895 that is about 2 grains slower (in 308) than new powder.

I develop a load for a particular application, and having done so, it is nice to have plenty of that powder , so I don't have to do the development with another lot #.
 
Sorry, yes, I should have mentioned that I give it a shake as well.

No worries, in retrospect it seems so obvious and yet I don't recall ever reading or hearing about doing it. Maybe because it or should be? Oh well, no real harm done aside from a little time wasted and a useful lesson learned on my part.:cheers:
 
I do this all the time. I take various jugs and drums of powder (typically 4895) and mix them all together in a clean garbage can, so I get 40 pounds of homogeneous powder of one (new) lot number, instead of 4 or five small and different lots.

There can be a substantial variation between a new jug of powder and old powder. I have a couple of drums of military surplus 4895 that is about 2 grains slower (in 308) than new powder.

I develop a load for a particular application, and having done so, it is nice to have plenty of that powder , so I don't have to do the development with another lot #.

I'm pretty sure I read that this is the recommended way to do things.
 
I have always done that, I just mak sure its well mixed. Just recently I mixed a jug of old lot # RL-22 with a new lot, and it works the same as expected.

And although I know it's taboo, I have mixed different powders, intentionally, and developed loads with that as well. I tried this long ago when I discovered some factory that had both ball and extruded powder in the same casing. It didn't kill me or harm my rifle, and I ended up with an excellent load!
 
Back
Top Bottom