live4therut
CGN frequent flyer
What there to panic about? lots of other style mags out there. Just some of us won't be drinking the magpul koolaid
Last edited:
Any details as to which way he ls leaning on this matter?
I think you see the problem the wrong side.
I think the MH must be able to take the mag from the mag industry leader.
Armalite made this mistake 10 years ago and has change the AR10 now takes PMAG.
So you confirm that MH third batch will not take PMAG.
To me it seems silly to re-engineer a rifle to fit ONE mag thereby precluding the use of all others. Magpul continually changes their stuff.
With there being several options that DO fit and function just fine and more coming I see no reason to put folks in a position where only 1 mag will work.
We have some mags enroute from Israel (NOT CAA) that should land here in the next few days and we have decided to make mags for it ourselves, but this will take some time to get molds made. For now ASC mags made for the Robinson arms rifles along with the C Products mags made for DPMS and all the other AR 10 rifles DO work just fine. Once we know that the Israeli mags function fully we will advise, and once our own mags are in production again we will be advising.
Why Magpul changed the location of their latch pocket, feed lips height and angles and follower angle eludes me as does what exactly they DO fit?
sooo.. what is your point? The MH is not an AR10 nor is it required to follow any SR25/M110 pattern.
It is a ATRS Modern Hunter. There are good mags that work presently available. And the future is then.....not now.
I would say a big percentage of the people willing to pony up 4k+ for these new MH's ( myself included) are buying one so they can have a non restricted ar10... aside from the obvious differences.
But you are correct, they are not required to follow any rules or guidelines, however, with how much attention and popularity these rifles will draw to themselves not being able to accept the most popular, inexpensive and easiest to obtain 308 mag on the market will be a big negative strike against it.
I would say a big percentage of the people willing to pony up 4k+ for these new MH's ( myself included) are buying one so they can have a non restricted ar10... aside from the obvious differences.
But you are correct, they are not required to follow any rules or guidelines, however, with how much attention and popularity these rifles will draw to themselves not being able to accept the most popular, inexpensive and easiest to obtain 308 mag on the market will be a big negative strike against it.
...
With all the uproar about Pmags I am thinking we should have gone with a proprietary mag like Swiss Arms, or Sako has from the beginning and not had to deal with this.
So do we have to constantly keep making revisions to keep up with all of the Magpul koolaid?
Think about it, they are now running generation 3 mags, how many more generations are they going to go through? We ran literally thousands of rounds through Gen 2 mags without a hiccup, so how are the Gen 3s any improvement apart from that now they do not fit some rifles including ours? What happens when Magpul dumps the Gen 3s for Gen 4s and they don't fit?
We CAN revise our rifle in the future production runs to fit the Gen 3 mags but then MANY more mags will not work. I would prefer to keep the options as open as possible. Remember a few years ago when Pmags were unobtainium? Then what?
According to Magpul their Gen 3 mags fit all platforms. Well fellas I am here to tell you they are WRONG! They do not work in several other makers AR10 platforms and do not work in the XCR-M that I just tried them in.
It would have been nice IF the Pmags had worked, and they would have IF Magpul had not seen fit to change their mags.
With all the uproar about Pmags I am thinking we should have gone with a proprietary mag like Swiss Arms, or Sako has from the beginning and not had to deal with this.