Modern Sporter

Mgraf said:
The “FRT isn’t law guy’s” sure disappear fast when you ask for any legitimate eveidence that you can still use the firearm other than there own legal opinion.
Click to expand...

Odd statement, considering the Modern Sporter is not a named variant in any legislation in the firearms act or criminal code. There is no law that prohibits you from enjoying your Modern Sporter.

Laws by nature don't "allow" you to do something. Laws are prohibitive by nature.
 
For clarity.
Our Modern line of rifles were NOT mentioned at all in the OIC, which IS the law regardless of how draconian it is.
Our Modern line of rifles had the FRT's unlawfully changed and redacted by the boys at the SFSS (rcmp firearms lab) However the FRT is NOT law, nor is it binding according to the first page of the FRT website that is at long last available for view by the average serf.
That all being said I agree with Runkles assessment that it could prove very spendy to prove yourself right.

Production, sales and delivery are under a cease and desist order from the EX CFO of Alberta and until we get back in front of Judge Gagne have our hands tied.
Meanwhile 18 months and 250000.00 later we are still waiting for the wheels of justice to start to turn again.
 
Bfranklin said:
Odd statement, considering the Modern Sporter is not a named variant in any legislation in the firearms act or criminal code. There is no law that prohibits you from enjoying your Modern Sporter.

Laws by nature don't "allow" you to do something. Laws are prohibitive by nature.
Click to expand...

The firearms lab considers it a variant and prohibited. Going to end up with a hell of court case if u take it out.
 
Mgraf said:
The firearms lab considers it a variant and prohibited. Going to end up with a hell of court case if u take it out.
Click to expand...

And therein lies the problem. Their OPINION is not law but of course LE may take their opinion as gospel and ruin yet another humans life for nothing.
Like the rcmp, the sfss needs to be disbanded and replaced with something functional and that has strict oversight. But being Canadastan this is very unlikely to happen as corruption lies and deceit are now so ingrained into our government I doubt anything can fix our horribly broken system.
 
alberta tactical rifle said:
For clarity.
Our Modern line of rifles were NOT mentioned at all in the OIC, which IS the law regardless of how draconian it is.
Our Modern line of rifles had the FRT's unlawfully changed and redacted by the boys at the SFSS (rcmp firearms lab) However the FRT is NOT law, nor is it binding according to the first page of the FRT website that is at long last available for view by the average serf.
That all being said I agree with Runkles assessment that it could prove very spendy to prove yourself right.

Production, sales and delivery are under a cease and desist order from the EX CFO of Alberta and until we get back in front of Judge Gagne have our hands tied.
Meanwhile 18 months and 250000.00 later we are still waiting for the wheels of justice to start to turn again.
Click to expand...

250k? dang... im glad i spent money with you. hope i can get another build someday. this #### makes me (and im sure you) mad though.
 
Mgraf said:
The firearms lab considers it a variant and prohibited. Going to end up with a hell of court case if u take it out.
Click to expand...

Is this the same firearms lab that did NOT consider it a variant for months/years before the OIC and stated same in writing?
 
I used the lawyer advice included in the package from the ccfr and asked what happens if I get caught and charged while using one they said they will not cover you in court so take that for whatever its worth
 
jg007 said:
Is this the same firearms lab that did NOT consider it a variant for months/years before the OIC and stated same in writing?
Click to expand...

The very same "lab" and the very same clowns that did the inspection and determination of legal classification.
The big question in my mind is were they incompetent before May 1 2020 or after?
 
MrPlatypus said:
I used the lawyer advice included in the package from the ccfr and asked what happens if I get caught and charged while using one they said they will not cover you in court so take that for whatever its worth
Click to expand...

I am not a lawyer but think if the firearm you are caught with was not an OIC prohibited firearm, then you would have some grey area to challenge them on support of defense. If it was an OIC prohibited firearm, you would have no claim at all.
 
I used the lawyer advice included in the package from the ccfr and asked what happens if I get caught and charged while using one they said they will not cover you in court so take that for whatever its worth

What a horrible way to phrase a sentence
 
alberta tactical rifle said:
I am not a lawyer but think if the firearm you are caught with was not an OIC prohibited firearm, then you would have some grey area to challenge them on support of defense. If it was an OIC prohibited firearm, you would have no claim at all.
Click to expand...

He told me if it has a prohibited FRT then its banned. I'm simply repeating what was told to me it's a #### show all around
 
So if a judge asks why it was non restricted before may 2020 and the answer is, it’s not an AR 15 . Then asks why it’s prohibited now and answer is , it’s an AR15 variant.

How can any judge possibly find you guilty?
How would any Crown, even attempt to lay a charge?

There must be some sort of law that penalizes the crown , if they are just trying to cause you financial loss.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom