Monte carlo stock or not

On most rifles I prefer a raised comb, Weatherby Vanguard style, Boyd's Heritage or Prairie hunter, Husqvarna 1900, most rifles that I buy with a straight comb get a new stock, I get a better cheek weld with a Monte Carlo style stock.
 
Two points of contact are the cheek and the shoulder, the Monte Carlo increases the vertical distance of these two points. Line-of-sight/eye-above-bore is the same with a straight stock or Monte Carlo, but the end of the stock where the butt plate is is lowered. People with longer necks may find a Monte Carlo more comfortable, people with short necks may like the standard stock better.

The stock contacts the shoulder, that is the base-line. The increase in vertical distance with the Monte Carlo means the bore line is higher. Heavy recoiling rifles tend to pivot at the shoulder, rotating enough that recoil is transferred to the cheek more than a straight stock.
 
I don’t have a strong preference either way, I have straight stocks, monte carlos and adjustable cheek pieces. This thread got me wondering though; enough that I was opening safe doors and counting.

I have admit though; as much as I like the look a modern classic stock; Monte Carlos fit me better and on long range rigs with big optics adjustable is the best way to fly.
 
Pics, or it didn't happen. And make sure to include a note with SuperCub handwritten on it. Landscape orientation, not portrait. Plain white, not lined.

On 2nd thought, I can do that ......

KEqggH0h.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom