Moose 30-06.

Thank you.
I believe you had my book a few years ago, also. When thinking back about all these things, I realize I was at the right place at the right time. All I had to do was write what I had done, seen or new the person who had done it.
I even had the right timing in the dawn to dusk work Kamlooky talks about also, because I was a bit too young, in the worst of the depression days! Most kids my age had to milk cows, but miraculously, I always talked my way out of it. One advantage of being the youngest sibling.
A painfully true adage of the time was, "A mans work is from sun to sun, a womans work is never done."

Writing it down is important, if it isn't recorded its as if it never happened. If a man doesn't know where he's been, he can't know where he's going. Your book and the stories you've repeated here are valuable history Bruce.
 
Yes, we in rural, northern Saskatchewan were never in dire straights. We really had so much of what we needed. Good garden soil, lots of wood for making buildings, for heat and cooking, plus cutting and selling cordwood in the winter to make some money. A tremendous amount of wild berries, including the very healthful wild blueberry, in unbelievable amounts, lots of water and such a variety of meat that no one I knew ate rabbits, except maybe for a short, fill in time.
The term dire straights fit the people who lived in cities, or a broad area of southern Sask. where the soil was litterally blown away. Many of those unlucky people stuck it out until nothing was left, then started for the north, about 300 miles away, with a skinny team of horses hauling a wagon with a hay rack on it. Mamma and the kids on the wagon along with the few bare nescessities and bringing what tiny bit of hay they could muster to last the horses and the cow tied behind, until they could find green feed for the animals. Families along the way often provided food and some sort of lodging for them, as they slowly worked their way north.
Many of these families ended up in our country, which was about sixty miles north east of Prince Albert and they were in their glory.
You talk of lots of deer and drinking moonshine. Now, let me think. A great belt of moonshine country ran from the Yorkton area north west and up past Wadena. Hmmm. Maybe you were some where in that area?

Ha-ha, bang on the money, my friend! right in line, about 1/2 way! :eek:
 
Will go hunting for moose this fall. My hunting companions all use 30-06 as will I. These guys all use the 180 grain bullet for moose. I would rather use a 150 or 160 grain bullet. We are using factory ammo.
Should I succumb to my partners and use the 180's or can I use the 150 or 160's?

Note - the OP is going to use factory ammo. So far as I know no one makes 160 gr. bullets so this gets him to 150 grain loads.

The OP doesn't say how far he is comfortable shooting. If he is at all competent shots to 150 or 175 yards can easily be made with 150 grainers but would be best with a premium bullet, IMO.

I've known of moose being killed with 100 gr. .243's without problem, ranges were relatively short and the user a good shot. The majority of the moose I have taken were with a .270 shooting 150 gr. bullets. While a 30 calibre 150 gr. bullet doesn't have the SD of a .270 it shouldn't matter out to the ranges mentioned above.

Since the OP asked for guidance I assume he doesn't have a lot of experience to draw on. Based on this he should expect to keep his shooting to relatively short ranges. If this is done a 150 grain 30 calibre bullet is certainly adequate.

Whether or not he considers the interchangeability of ammo with his buddies is important is for him to figure out. Keep in mind that his original question seemed to be whether or not a 150 bullet is adequate.

Sometimes these discussions seem to stray a long way from what is being asked. Just my opinion.

JIm
 
Back
Top Bottom