Moose and wolves.

I did some quick research on moose populations. I hypothesized that agriculture has the highest impact on moose numbers when comparing Newfoundland to Saskatchewan. Seems there is strong evidence to support my hypothesis.

So I want to know why there are so many more moose in Newfoundland than Saskatchewan for example, where people say moose populations are too high at approximately 8000 in the southern farmland region compared to an estimated 120,000 in Newfoundland. In both areas of comparison wolves have been extirpated ( they don't exist).

Saskatchewan population 2014 statcan: 1.13 million
Sk land mass: 651,036 sq. km
Moose in south estimate 8000
Wolves south of forest fringe (farmland region): 0

Newfoundland population 2014 statcan: 526,997
Landmass: 405,212 sq. km
Moose on island estimate 120,000
Wolves on island: 0 (extirpated in 1936)

So why such a pronounced population difference? Availablity and suitability of habitat.

SK cropland 2006 Census of Agriculture statcan: 37.7 million acres
moose density (using 250,000 sq.km for farmland area): 1/31 sq.km

N.L. 2006 cropland: 89,441
Moose density: 1/834 acres or 3.3 moose/sq.km

If I had the moose density of N.L. on my property I would have 6.4 moose...and it still wouldn't be enough. For those of you that think that your resources are too plentiful you should be starting conservation efforts now because most of the rest of the planet has very little in the way of wildlife resources. Moose or wolves...we certainly don't have enough to be wasted. If you're going to cull a species at least make use of what you take.

It wasn't all that long ago that people said the fish stocks off the west bank were endless...what happened to the fishery? Did the sharks net them all?
 
There are showing up in the southern farm lands but believe they are targeting deer and years ago moose were not common in the southern part of the province. As for Sask north there is more hunting pressure than the other provinces with only part of it be regulated. As in some parts of the province has an increase in tags due to reasons that have been mentioned above
 
Last edited:
In the mid 90's, I saw a monster moose cross the Trans Canada Highway just inside the Manitoba/Saskatchewan border. Kinda freaked me out, but the truckers going the other direction were asking each other if they were hallucinating.

Was an odd sight seeing that big critter wade through a field of Canola hopscotching from pothole to pothole (I'm guessing that's what he was doing)

Since then I've seen more moose in Saskatchewan that I have in Northern Ontario.

And the ratio of live to dead moose is around 2/3 dead moose to live moose.
 
umchorn2 said:
...resource departments are under tremendous pressure to maintain low wildlife population levels in general...I never shoot immature animals. We as hunters can make sure we have enough to hunt by never shooting females or the immature of the species...

In all but the most inaccessible and remote locations do wolves even play into or have an impact on wildlife populations, and when they do, it balances things.
Click to expand...

Sorry, but this is gibberish.

The last "sentence" above is probably as full of fail as everything else you have written, but it's hard to say for sure; I've read it several times and still can't figure out what it means.
 
there is no such a thing for balance in nature ... and predators are part of a chain and actors not judge. they eat or kill when they want and die when there is no food ...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom