More ar like firearms going prohib

Keene has not been a serving member since he retired in 2006, and as stated he was a reserve officer (initially armour but then his unit changed to infantry). He found his calling as a Public Affairs Officer as in real life he was a journalist, as previously stated the farthest possible thing from a weapons expert. I had a Public Affairs Officer who had mostly spent his career with JTF2 (and had to listen to all his stories on the plane ride into theatre) fire a 9mm round from his Browning while clearing it off the tarmac at Kandahar Airfield while standing under the wing of a US C-130 Herc, frigging assclown but at least he didn't shoot himself in the foot like the author stated was so prevalent in the CAF. I love how the CBC rolls out these pundits that have zero credibility and the majority of the population eats this up, would like to see our support networks write a publicized rebuttal.
 
Not defending this, just clarifying what is on the RCMP webpage given what was posted:

Owners of newly prohibited firearms and devices are to keep them securely stored in accordance with their previous classification. The Display, Storage, Transportation and Handling of Firearms by Individuals Regulations (the Regulations) are available on the Department of Justice website.
Newly prohibited firearms and devices cannot be sold or imported.
Newly prohibited firearms and devices may only be transported under limited circumstances.*
Newly prohibited firearms and devices cannot be legally used for hunting unless allowed through the amnesty.**
Newly prohibited firearms cannot be used for sport shooting, either at a range or elsewhere.
 
I read the legislation thoroughly. It states the following about the amnesty period and usage of the previously non restricted, but newly prohibited weapons.
here it is.

"The Amnesty Order has been made to protect affected individuals who (1) were in legal possession of a newly prohibited firearm or prohibited device at the time the Regulations came into force, and, (2) continue to hold a valid licence during the amnesty period, from criminal liability for unlawful possession of a prohibited firearm in order to afford the individuals with time to dispose of the firearms. Disposal can include: having the firearm deactivated by an approved business; delivering the firearm or device to a police officer; legally exporting the firearm; and, if a business, returning the firearm or device to the manufacturer. Other permitted activities during the amnesty period are to transport the firearm for any of the above purposes and to use the newly prohibited firearm, if previously non-restricted, to hunt for the purposes of sustenance or to exercise a right recognized and affirmed by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 (the Constitution). Individuals are no longer allowed to import the firearms listed in the Regulations. Affected owners will no longer be permitted to sell to individuals within Canada or use the prohibited firearms, and no transportation will be permitted except for the purposes described above. The firearms will have to be kept securely stored in accordance with the legal storage requirements for the classification of the specified firearms prior to their prohibition.

Individuals may transport the firearms one time to return home with the firearm if it was not at the owner’s residence at the time the prohibition came into force, or, if not the owner and in possession of the firearm on the day the prohibition came into force, return the firearm to its owner.

The amnesty period begins on the date of coming into force of the Amnesty Order and expires on April 30, 2022. Upon the expiration of the Amnesty Order, individuals who are in possession of a prohibited firearm or prohibited device could be prosecuted for unlawful possession."

Source is the gazette of canada http://gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2020/2020-05-01-x3/html/sor-dors96-eng.html

The part that im talking about is "If previously non-restricted, to hunt for the purposes of sustance or to exercise a right recognized and affirmed by section 35 of the Constitution Act.


True North Arms Corp. The legislation as it stands states that only the upper and lower receivers are to be prohibited.
But it does not mention the prohibition of any of the internal/external parts, and according to the legislation, and amnesty
period, you as a provider of parts of these NON-RESTRICTED rifles should be allowed to continue acquiring them through
import and should be allowed to continue selling them until at least when the amnesty period runs out.

At that point, there would be no legal way to use any of the above mentioned newly prohibited and therefor one could no
longer argue my above point as mentioned.

As the legislation states, you are allowed to continue selling parts for all of the newly prohibited, but previously non restricted
rifles.



Really? I’m pretty sure anything that is now prohibited must now stay in your safe . NOT ALLOWED TO USE IT AT ALL
 
TNA you have been my go to for parts for a long time, you guys ROCK. I really don't need anything right now but I'm going to place an order today. I sincerely hope your business will survive this madness and thrive once again when it is over.
Randy
 
How to they expect us to keep up with all their additions, I can’t seem to find a list other than the initial 1500.

They don’t care if we can keep up with it. But again the FRT isn’t law, collectively we should ignore it. This is war , we need the will to fight not the will to roll over. This isn’t about guns anymore , it’s about the democracy and future of Canada.
 
wa6sx5wbfly41.gif
 
They don’t care if we can keep up with it. But again the FRT isn’t law, collectively we should ignore it. This is war , we need the will to fight not the will to roll over. This isn’t about guns anymore , it’s about the democracy and future of Canada.

Only what was in the IOC as published in the Gazette is in force. All the RCMP grumpy making change that are not in the IOC Are effectively overreaching and themselves breaking the law. There is plently for the gun Org to court challenge those.

BUT - it seem none of ou guns org were ready to move - as always - reactive...it’s seem all this felt on our heads without any org having make plans ahead..We are behind the ball..not a winning strategy.
 
They don’t care if we can keep up with it. But again the FRT isn’t law, collectively we should ignore it. This is war , we need the will to fight not the will to roll over. This isn’t about guns anymore , it’s about the democracy and future of Canada.
Yes and yes , finally people are stating it!
Don't get bogged down in the details.
 
I heard a former military member (Tony Keene), who doesn't believe "ordinary people" should have handguns, said we can all use BB guns for target practice.
What an insult to his uniform. Article here: https ://www.cbc.ca/news/opinion/opinion-gun-control-handguns-1.5532173?cmp=apple-news_cbc-news_comments#comments-15532173. Here's what he thinks of us: [FONT="]Those of us trained in the use of handguns (and I mean properly trained, by the police or the military, not just a weekend course at the local gun club) know that the armed amateur is dangerous. A police officer on a gun call does not want Citizen Rambo whipping out a personal gat to come to their assistance. That officer needs a clear field of observation and fire, and only one potential threat.[/FONT]

I'm sure he'd love to hear from members here about how little training we have.

Police and military weapons training is a joke unless your active infantry...even then most cant shoot a handgun for ####.
 
Back
Top Bottom