More shameless Glock advocacy.

Big Bad

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
I just want to share this thought provoking article that gets everything right for once, including the final remarks about Glock beauty. :)



10 advantages of the Glock

Guns and Gear

Contributor

By Patrick Sweeney, Gun Digest

According to Corey Graff, Gun Digest’s editor, Master Gunsmith Patrick Sweeney is no starry-eyed fanboy of the Glock. Just read his new book, Glock Deconstructed, and you’ll see why. But even Sweeney, who authored 1911: The First 100 Years—and countless other articles on the Glock v. 1911 debate—could not discount the advantages of the Glock auto pistol. Here are his top 10 from the Gun Digest Book of the Glock.

Reliability

In those preceding years, the other pistols had in many cases been manufactured to a less demanding standard. They had been made when precision meant hand fitting, and everyone expected pistols to be somewhat less reliable than revolvers. Soon the “hand-fit vs. reliability” debate would sputter out, but until then, Glock was first. The level of reliability that Glocks demonstrate can be approached and matched by other pistols, but there is a definite advantage in being first.

Durability

Here Glock has a definite advantage. The polymer frame shrugs off impacts that would dent or crack other frames made of aluminum or steel. Unless you’re willing to make your handgun excessively bulky (and thus solid) it won’t be as durable. And that heavy, who’d want it?

Weight

The Glock’s big Glock advantage is its weight. Or lack thereof, really. The standard G-17 tips the scales empty at a feathery 22 ounces. Comparable pistols come in 25 to 30 percent heavier, and revolvers must be quite compact to beat the Glock. Big revolvers can’t do it; small or airweight can; but they all lack capacity.

Grip Shape

The advantageous shape of the Glock grip stems from two things; the polymer design and the European search for a “natural pointing angle” between grip and bore. The polymer design of the Glock frame means that there is no need for grips. And the deletion of grips also means no grip screws, no bushings for same and no need to worry about them coming loose.

Low Bore

The Glock … rails are so small they hardly add anything to the parts stack height up to the bore. There is no hammer, so the hammer pivot isn’t in the way of lowering the bore. The barrel locks into the ejection port of the slide, so the thickness of steel above the barrel is no more than that needed for structural integrity. And the firing pin height is only what is needed for the tail to reach down to the cruciform of the trigger bar.

Low Felt Recoil
Low felt recoil results from the combination of the flex of the polymer frame, the grip angle and the hand-filling grip that doesn’t have joints where the (non-existent) grips meet the frame, and the low bore line. The low bore aids low felt recoil, as the cycling parts do not have as much leverage when they bottom out against the frame. Also, the flex of the polymer frame changes the nature of the impact between slide and frame.

Maintainability

On a Glock, you can practically teach your dog to swap extractors. You can swap parts yourself, once you’ve had about 10 minutes of coaching. You can replace worn or broken ones, or replace lost ones that you dropped on the last cleaning. About the only things that might require extra tools or some training would be installing new sights or fitting a new, non-Glock-made barrel.

Capacity

For its size, the Glock holds more rounds than any other pistol. For a brief time during the Assault Weapons Ban of 1994, all pistols held a maximum of 10 rounds, at least those with magazines made at the time. Since the sunsetting of that egregious law we are back to full-capacity magazines. When the G-17 came to be, the top capacity pistols were the traditional Browning Hi-Power at 13 rounds and the S&W M‑59 at 15.

Simplicity of Use

For training, less time spent learning the “knobs and buttons” meant that more time could be spent learning sight alignment and trigger control. Students issued Glocks posted higher qualification scores with less time and shooting than those issued revolvers or other pistols.

They Look Cool

The Glock design exudes a businesslike air unlike any other firearm. Yes, it is irrational to attach an emotional state to an object, but as emotional creatures that is what we humans do. And just to make sure you know where I stand on the issue (firmly in the middle) it is my personal feeling that a Glock has all of the warmth, charm, personality and character of an industrial tool.




Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/08/19/10-advantages-of-the-glock/#ixzz4IRLAkCWw
 
People are convinced... but currently priced wayyy to high ($1000 for a G17, are you kidding?) to justify it over $700 M&P.

That's because glocks have a substantially higher selling rate. All the new glocks on the Canadian market were purchased after the Canadian dollar sh!t whereas a lot of the cheaper 700 dollar M&P pistols were purchased before. Once those dry up you'll see M&P pistols hit the 900-1000 dollar mark
 
OK, I'll play. Keep in mind I own a Gen 4 G19 and think it is a superb handgun. But the author of this piece is trying way too hard. A lot of what he says are Glock advantages have been matched by others. What he should be pointing out is that Glock had these features first and forced the rest to play catch up, improving handguns overall.


Durability

Here Glock has a definite advantage. The polymer frame shrugs off impacts that would dent or crack other frames made of aluminum or steel. Unless you’re willing to make your handgun excessively bulky (and thus solid) it won’t be as durable. And that heavy, who’d want it?

There is no way that a Glock frame is any more durable than an all steel 1911 frame. The 1911 could pound fence posts all day and still shoot bad guys at night.


Weight

The Glock’s big Glock advantage is its weight. Or lack thereof, really. The standard G-17 tips the scales empty at a feathery 22 ounces. Comparable pistols come in 25 to 30 percent heavier, and revolvers must be quite compact to beat the Glock. Big revolvers can’t do it; small or airweight can; but they all lack capacity.

All polymer pistols have this advantage, it isn't exclusive to Glock.


Grip Shape

The advantageous shape of the Glock grip stems from two things; the polymer design and the European search for a “natural pointing angle” between grip and bore. The polymer design of the Glock frame means that there is no need for grips. And the deletion of grips also means no grip screws, no bushings for same and no need to worry about them coming loose.

This is really reaching. The Glock grip angle is certainly no more optimum than a 1911, M&P, various HK's, Beretta's, etc. and is different enough that it is hard to jump from other guns over to the Glock without having to retrain for the oddball grip angle. This is my biggest dislike of Glocks. If they redid the grip angle to be closer to the rest of the handgun world it would be a major improvement, IMO. The grip shape of the G17 and the other full size models can best be described as being very much like a 2x4. They certainly don't fit small hands as well as the 1911 or M&P do from my experience.


Low Felt Recoil

Low felt recoil results from the combination of the flex of the polymer frame, the grip angle and the hand-filling grip that doesn’t have joints where the (non-existent) grips meet the frame, and the low bore line. The low bore aids low felt recoil, as the cycling parts do not have as much leverage when they bottom out against the frame. Also, the flex of the polymer frame changes the nature of the impact between slide and frame.

My impressions of Glocks is that they do not offer lower felt recoil than other comparable pistols. I don't think they are any worse, either, but certainly not significantly better.


Capacity

For its size, the Glock holds more rounds than any other pistol. For a brief time during the Assault Weapons Ban of 1994, all pistols held a maximum of 10 rounds, at least those with magazines made at the time. Since the sunsetting of that egregious law we are back to full-capacity magazines. When the G-17 came to be, the top capacity pistols were the traditional Browning Hi-Power at 13 rounds and the S&W M‑59 at 15.

At one point this was true, but the rest have caught up now.


Simplicity of Use

For training, less time spent learning the “knobs and buttons” meant that more time could be spent learning sight alignment and trigger control. Students issued Glocks posted higher qualification scores with less time and shooting than those issued revolvers or other pistols.

Again, other polymer guns are equivalent these days.


They Look Cool

Personally, I think they are fugly, but that is in the eye of the beholder. To me their charm is in how well they work, nothing more.


Mark
 
That's because glocks have a substantially higher selling rate. All the new glocks on the Canadian market were purchased after the Canadian dollar sh!t whereas a lot of the cheaper 700 dollar M&P pistols were purchased before. Once those dry up you'll see M&P pistols hit the 900-1000 dollar mark

This is not news to me, but you're still better off buying a used Gen3 Austrian made with the stronger Tenifer finish.
 
I just want to share this thought provoking article that gets everything right for once, including the final remarks about Glock beauty. :)



10 advantages of the Glock

Guns and Gear

Contributor

By Patrick Sweeney, Gun Digest

According to Corey Graff, Gun Digest’s editor, Master Gunsmith Patrick Sweeney is no starry-eyed fanboy of the Glock. Just read his new book, Glock Deconstructed, and you’ll see why. But even Sweeney, who authored 1911: The First 100 Years—and countless other articles on the Glock v. 1911 debate—could not discount the advantages of the Glock auto pistol. Here are his top 10 from the Gun Digest Book of the Glock.



Weight

The Glock’s big Glock advantage is its weight. Or lack thereof, really. The standard G-17 tips the scales empty at a feathery 22 ounces. Comparable pistols come in 25 to 30 percent heavier, and revolvers must be quite compact to beat the Glock. Big revolvers can’t do it; small or airweight can; but they all lack capacity.

Low Felt Recoil
Low felt recoil results from the combination of the flex of the polymer frame, the grip angle and the hand-filling grip that doesn’t have joints where the (non-existent) grips meet the frame, and the low bore line. The low bore aids low felt recoil, as the cycling parts do not have as much leverage when they bottom out against the frame. Also, the flex of the polymer frame changes the nature of the impact between slide and frame.


I'll disagree as well. I like the heavier feel of an all-metal gun and find it definitely has less recoil than the Glock I fired.
 
0f456c586aa688c52ffd900741c628c3_zpsf9d81c2d.jpg
 
while i own a Glock and enjoy shooting it and can agree that it is a super reliable gun i can not in any way shape or form take anyone seriously if they state the Glock was a good looking gun.

Glock is the Ikea of the gun world, plain and simple.
 
The Glock pistol is an iconic gun (in a generally positive sense), for well-earned reasons. There is an appeal to its utilitarian aesthetic, but, as always, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

I feel like some of the polarization of Glocks is because of its status as an icon. It's been the handgun of the past three decades; an ugly, rectangular, plastic reminder that your all-steel, slab-sided, 7-round boat anchor is a thing of the past. :p
 
I stepped out my Glock 22 and 34 and bought a Grand Power Q100 and I love it but I think I will always have a Glock. I don't see the Glock as Ugly I think it is quite beautiful . Like a good Woman when you come home, good to look at and can still do the dishes and have your dinner ready.:)
 
Back
Top Bottom