Ok here are my finding for the patterning tests i did yesterday. I patterned Remington Hypersonic, Federal Blackcloud, Federal Waterfowl and Winchester Expert. I would have loved to pattern the gun with 3.5" shells, but i didnt have any 3.5" Hypersonics or Blackclouds and didnt feel like spending $60 on shells i dont really use. Test was done with both factory modified and kicks high flyer modified choke. All 4 brands tested were BB's and were pattered at 30 yards. Here are my results
1) All four shells patterned better with the Kicks high flyer choke. The kicks choke is an extended ported choke that adds an additional 1.5" in barrel length. The extra length likely contributes to the better patterns. The Kicks choke also had noticeably less recoil then the factory choke
2) The order from best pattern to worst with the factory choke was Winchester Xpert, Federal Waterfowl and Federal Blackcloud and Remington Hypersonic. It is important to note that there was minimal and almost negligible difference from 1-3, and the Hypersonic shooting slighly high and to the right.
3) the order from best to worse using the kicks choke was federal waterfowl, hypersonic, federal blackcloud, winchester xpert. There was virtually zero difference between the blackcloud and xpert, and the order could be reversed. The hypersonic was vastly improved with the kicks choke which may have been improved due to the reduced recoil (possible i didnt flinch as much). The federal waterfowl had quite a few wild flyers, however they also punched the biggest holes closest to the centre which was impressive.
My conclusion remains unchanged. Although the blackcloud did pattern better then i recalled, it wasnt leaps and bounds better then the inexpensive ammo for me to justify the additional costs. The hypersonics im sure would be devastating with 3.5" shells, but i know they dont reliably cycle with my mossberg and at $45 a box, its an expensive way to turn a gun into a single shot. I will continue to use the federal waterfowl and winchester xpert based on their satisfactory performance and cost.