You don't need a brake on a .338 Federal.
Effective and Loud go hand and hand with muzzle breaks.... there is a choice of noise direction but that’s about all.
Well brakes not breaks do not magnify sound... they can only redirect it.
Maybe that is your choice but who are you to say what someone else may or may not "need'? It's a personal choice...
Perhaps he is under the mistaken impression that the .338 Fed is a heavy recoiling cartridge, which it is not, and pretty much anyone can handle one... "and" I do not make money in suggesting it is not required...
I have many rifles and not one with a brake. I'm just thinking that a 5.5 lb Montana shooting 210 grain bullets might be a touch unpleasant. I'm still up in the air about the whole thing. Interesting brake guntech. If I go the break route I'll certainly consider one of yours. Thanks guys
Perhaps he is under the mistaken impression that the .338 Fed is a heavy recoiling cartridge, which it is not, and pretty much anyone can handle one... "and" I do not make money in suggesting it is not required...
Are you inferring I suggested a brake is required?
The op stated, "I'm thinking of putting a 20 inch 338 federal barrel on a kimber Montana". No one posted it is a requirement...
"anyone can handle the .338 Fed."
Well three years ago my shoulder couldn't handle a .338 Federal... now two years after shoulder replacement I still wouldn't choose to shoot it.
The radial brake might not be a great idea if you shoot prone at all, they kick up dust and debris like you wouldn't believe.
I agree but I haven't seen anyone shooting prone while hunting in 50 years...




























