I don't think you would want a revolver in a SHTF scenario. Although in theory, revolvers may seem more fool-proof because they don't rely on recoil to function, revolvers have their own issues that make them suboptimal for field conditions and hard use. If mud or sand get in the action and gum up the gun, there is no easy way to take it apart for cleaning, especially in the field. They also have fragile parts that can be easily damaged if the gun is banged around, the cylinder crane and timing notches being particularly vulnerable (that's why you're not supposed to close the cylinder "Hollywood style", by flicking the wrist.) There is a reason why most militaries switched to semi-auto pistols over a century ago, while police forces continued to use revolvers well into the 80's and 90's.
I agree, the revolvers are neat to use, and work well, but in this day and age there are a lot of dependable pistols available .


















































