Here are some pictures of the Long Lee-Metford, and the Long Lee-Enfield.
When I received the cut down Lee-Metford, it had a butt stock from a Long Lee-Enfield, with a 1897 date and the following markings.
The Metford MkII didn't have a safety but the MkII* did. This MkII was manufactured in 1895 and probably had an upgrade with a MkII* bolt with a safety. According to Skennertons book on Enfields, the British only manufactured 13,479 MkII* Metford long rifles. The British had a history of modifying existing rifles in their arsenals. The serial number matches the Metford rifle but the style of the numbers on the bolt dos not match. For my Metford I need the short top wood (hand guard). If someone has a top hand guard like my Long Lee-Enfield, I would really appreciate sending me a PM.
Butt stock markings of my 1896.
When I received the cut down Lee-Metford, it had a butt stock from a Long Lee-Enfield, with a 1897 date and the following markings.
1897
I
I
I
I
The Metford MkII didn't have a safety but the MkII* did. This MkII was manufactured in 1895 and probably had an upgrade with a MkII* bolt with a safety. According to Skennertons book on Enfields, the British only manufactured 13,479 MkII* Metford long rifles. The British had a history of modifying existing rifles in their arsenals. The serial number matches the Metford rifle but the style of the numbers on the bolt dos not match. For my Metford I need the short top wood (hand guard). If someone has a top hand guard like my Long Lee-Enfield, I would really appreciate sending me a PM.











Butt stock markings of my 1896.
