Nice pistol too but the mag safety disconnect will be a real pain in the ass if you ever want to use it for competition. Out of the two pistols you've mentioned I'd go with the Glock. Parts, mags and holsters are plentiful and easy to come by. You really should consider what you buy for future competition too. Its a mistake I made in the beginning.
if i had to pick it would be the glock. just dont like the feel or looks.
Glock I am a big glock fan but I had to do a trigger job on it because I hated the pull so much and replace the junk factory plastic sights. I do love glocks reliability and overall build quality. After all the work it shoots like a dream.
Was it expensive to get a trigger job on the glock? I currently own a Norc 1911 tricked out (I even have a fancy burris fastfire) on it, and I am looking for a 9mm. I will probably throw a fastfire on it too. I was going to buy a Norc Sig 226 copy, but my little baby hands are just too small for the Sig - I feel like I am holding a phone book. I generally prefer single stack, but have always liked the look of the Glock, and handled the new Gen.4 with the smaller grip, and it was OK. How is a Glock for accuracy - and is that trigger job expensive?
Hi,
You'll go through the Glock phase and maybe buy one or two more polymer-based pistols like a S&W M&P or IWI Jericho but in the end you will come to realize that steel-based model pistols such as those made by Sig and STI are superior in accuracy, longevity and reliability.
I'm not saying Glocks are no good. I owend three of them (G17, G22, G35) and they worked fine and were easy to clean, etc. I just found them too light for rapid fire and on-the move accurate shooting due to their light polymer-based frames, which don't help to dampen recoil forces as well as solid steel-based frames and slides do.
If I were you, I would invest the extra $400 in a good used Sig P226R or a new STI Spartan in 9mm. But I'm not you and we all have to learn by trial and error. Good luck.
C![]()



























