My glock blew up

[hayday]

Reloads are not recommended with brass fired from unsupported chambers, which is a given for any firearm.

Glocks have unsupported chambers.

Therefore it is recommended to not fire brass shot from glocks.

The newer generations support the brass much better than older generations, and I have shot tens of thousands of Glock brass without issues.

I can google any model of firearm that has exploded and post the pictures. It doesn't mean that particular make/model is poor.

You continue to post the same picture of the obese lady with glocks stuffed down the front of her pouch, which is disturbing.

There is no 'Glock lottery' nor is there is 'Glock leg'. Not everything you read on the internet is true. The issues you post about are completely user error. I have yet to shoot myself in the leg or have any of my Glocks blow up and I have fired and carried far more than the average shooter.

It is obvious that you dislike Glocks, and that is okay. However, blaming user-induced malfunctions solely on the firearm is pure ignorance and someone who claims to be grandfathered should know better.

But, by all means, post some more photos of obese women to prove your point.

There are a few point made here. First, Jericho obviously doesn't like me posting pictures of his Mom on CGN, and I respect that.

Second, he is in denial about the fact that Glocks grenade when people reload for them and find themselves winning the "Glock Kaboom lottery" - where an already weakened permanently damaged case from a previous firing in Glock's oversized and unsupported chamber happens to line-up with the feedramp again in a subsequent firing. He doesn't want to deal with the fact that he has cheaped-out and bought an inherently flawed pistol. Beside that he doesn't have a lot to do there on "the Rock" - and so spends his days and nights searching CGN, looking for people to malign. Fellow Glock owners will do fine and Jericho, like most Glock owners, love to blame other Glock owners when something goes bad for them which is actually attributable to the design of the gun itself - whether they get a bad case of "Glock leg" or win the Glock Kaboom Lottery.

If you point out the flaws of the gun he will not deal with the facts and instead he will malign you - 'cause he's just that kinda guy. He will tell you how many zillion rounds he has shot and will think that actual means something - like that it has never happened to someone else for example our OP. Like I have mentioned some Glock owners just aren't that bright.

He has called me a lefty. Well sorry to disappoint you with the facts Jericho but here is a link to a 19 minute long video (LINK!) presumably made by some other pinko lefty who, I guess I must be conspiring with - and who otherwise seems to have some connection or affiliation to the NRA. This pinko with Legally Armed America explains the whole deal with Glock bulge and the special risks associated with reloading for the Glock, in terms that even you might understand (if you would take your fingers out of your ears).

The only part of this I disagree with is I doubt that the Redding die he is endorsing actually makes cases damaged by the Glock safe to reload. Read the comments. Others have the same view.

 

[Jericho]

There are a few point made here. First, Jericho obviously doesn't like me posting pictures of his Mom on CGN, and I respect that.

Second, he is in denial about the fact that Glocks grenade when people reload for them and find themselves winning the "Glock Kaboom lottery" - where an already weakened permanently damaged case from a previous firing in Glock's oversized and unsupported chamber happens to line-up with the feedramp again in a subsequent firing. He doesn't want to deal with the fact that he has cheaped-out and bought an inherently flawed pistol. Beside that he doesn't have a lot to do there on "the Rock" - and so spends his days and nights searching CGN, looking for people to malign. Fellow Glock owners will do fine and Jericho, like most Glock owners, love to blame other Glock owners when something goes bad for them which is actually attributable to the design of the gun itself - whether they get a bad case of "Glock leg" or win the Glock Kaboom Lottery.

If you point out the flaws of the gun he will not deal with the facts and instead he will malign you - 'cause he's just that kinda guy. He will tell you how many zillion rounds he has shot and will think that actual means something - like that it has never happened to someone else for example our OP. Like I have mentioned some Glock owners just aren't that bright.

He has called me a lefty. Well sorry to disappoint you with the facts Jericho but here is a link to a 19 minute long video (LINK!) presumably made by some other pinko lefty who, I guess I must be conspiring with - and who otherwise seems to have some connection or affiliation to the NRA. This pinko with Legally Armed America explains the whole deal with Glock bulge and the special risks associated with reloading for the Glock, in terms that even you might understand (if you would take your fingers out of your ears).

The only part of this I disagree with is I doubt that the Redding die he is endorsing actually makes cases damaged by the Glock safe to reload. Read the comments. Others have the same view.

Again, just because you repost the same garbage, doesn't mean it's true.

No one denies that shooting compromised casings is a good thing. Reloading with safe components isn't Lee's responsibility or Glock's. It is the responsibility of the reloader. So, why you keep speaking of that is beyond me. Beating a deadhorse that isn't Glock specific.

There are many guns with unsupported chambers. Again, this issue isn't Glock specific. Reloading compromised casings is a no-no and they should be discarded.

Once again, yes, you can shoot reloads in stock Glock pistols without issues.

Once again, guys shooting themselves in the leg during holstering/unholstering isn't a Glock specific issue. There are plenty of documented cases where guys with non Glocks have shot themselves in the leg during holster manipulation.

The fact that you bring my ?mother? into this discussion is as ridiculous as are your anti Glock claims. Nothing you have posted is Glock specific.

So, until you can cite issues that are proven to be Glock specific, you haven't a leg to stand on.

 

[RePete]

This thread has gone its distance.

DO NOT OPEN THIS UP AGAIN.