Sporting Lad
Regular
- Location
- Vancouver Island
I'm having trouble fitting my Tapco 20/5 mag into my 1952 Tula with the TAPCO "Intrafuse"
stock.
Briefly, the mag seems too wide to fit within the confines of the SKS magazine well.
At first I wondered if it was the TAPCO stock that was causing it, but that's not the problem; the mag does fine
until it hits the steel of the receiver. I'm just not sure exactly where I need to trim it.
I suppose I could reinstall the factory stock and give it another try, but I don't expect a different result.
One idea was to do some sanding of the Tapco mag's sides.
IDK, I hate to have to sand that much area on both sides of the mag.
The difference in width between the factory mag and the Tapco is about 1-1/2 to 2-1/2 mm (total).
Split that and I need to sand just ~1 mm on each side.
That's certainly sandable. It ought to be required only on the top ~ 12 mm (1/2") of the mag's
sides. I could do that, but I'd want to be sure before I went ahead and did any serious reshaping.
The tolerances are so tight in there and it's hard to see, so I can't get a good pic.
It seems to me that the factory mag well is narrower than the Tapco mag, or the Tapco mag is too
wide to be accepted by the factory mag well. It's hard to see exactly what's going on in there.
Maybe there is something else that's preventing the two from mating. Maybe I'm overlooking something
obvious. The mag ought to just >CLACK< right in there.
The bolt is open...
Why should we have to custom fit a mag that's supposed to be designed specifically for an SKS?
Has anyone else experienced this problem when inserting their Tapco mag for the first time?
Briefly, the mag seems too wide to fit within the confines of the SKS magazine well.
At first I wondered if it was the TAPCO stock that was causing it, but that's not the problem; the mag does fine
until it hits the steel of the receiver. I'm just not sure exactly where I need to trim it.
I suppose I could reinstall the factory stock and give it another try, but I don't expect a different result.
One idea was to do some sanding of the Tapco mag's sides.
IDK, I hate to have to sand that much area on both sides of the mag.
The difference in width between the factory mag and the Tapco is about 1-1/2 to 2-1/2 mm (total).
Split that and I need to sand just ~1 mm on each side.
That's certainly sandable. It ought to be required only on the top ~ 12 mm (1/2") of the mag's
sides. I could do that, but I'd want to be sure before I went ahead and did any serious reshaping.
The tolerances are so tight in there and it's hard to see, so I can't get a good pic.
It seems to me that the factory mag well is narrower than the Tapco mag, or the Tapco mag is too
wide to be accepted by the factory mag well. It's hard to see exactly what's going on in there.
Maybe there is something else that's preventing the two from mating. Maybe I'm overlooking something
obvious. The mag ought to just >CLACK< right in there.
The bolt is open...
Why should we have to custom fit a mag that's supposed to be designed specifically for an SKS?
Has anyone else experienced this problem when inserting their Tapco mag for the first time?



















































