For those posting about physical eye issues, again this is not the topic. If one eye mechanically works better than the other and cannot be repaired it is reasonable to assume this person would have issues using the poor eye.
I am trying to get some of you to understand that the "simple test" is flawed. The test is supposed to tell you something and in fact it doesn't. One problem is that as humans we do not move perfectly symmetrical. I have done these "tests" with dozens of non shooters and demonstrated to each after several tries that it doesn't work. Something very important for everyone to understand is that the person must for example, move the tube off center to be able to see. Again, they choose which direction to move off center in order to see through the opening or line something up or which is blocking the view. What I am saying is that for every person I have shown this, they can be told to try ever so slightly to favor any eye they choose. Guess what, they come up with the expected result every single time. These "tests" simply do not work. Typically a "coach" had told them they are ### eye dominate after performing the trick. Now if the person believes this, it is usually enough to skew the results in that favor and we have another believer. What I am telling you is that we must decide somehow to line up for the test. This decision does not mean there is a problem, it simply means we made a decision because we had to in order to finish the test.
Ishodu, you are not alone. Exactly how I shoot and what I am trying to convey. If people would start with a person that never heard of the myth and don't tell them then they miraculously have no issue. I have asked three optometrists and one ophthalmologist about this. Each of them told me to do a "simple test". I explained the mechanics of choosing which way to move my hand or arm so that I can see through a hole or what is covering the focus point and that I decide what to focus on they were shocked and proceeded to tell me they have no training on this subject and it is not in their field of study. Each told me that they don't remember having any real information on the subject.
For the posters that disagree with me, please take notice what questions I ask people and what you tell people. I know I trick people into telling me what I want to hear, you don't know that your doing it.. The absolute truth of the matter is that I can go back, explain how the test is fallacy and get them to give me a different result. Now its fun for them and not a worry about a deficiency. I call it a myth or fallacy because of the ease at which people can give me a different result. If it was real, most if not all would give me repeated results even after I tell them how the test is skewed. This is why I must speak out and get your attention. I think most people that disagree with me expect a result and hold onto it not understanding how they coached a response. I haven't tried a person with one eye that functions significantly better than another. I would naturally expect them to favor one eye. If a person favors an eye a little bit it does not mean they have a problem. It does not mean they have to take drastic measures to correct the problem. If a shooter has an actual eye problem then yeah, help them compensate. The power of belief is amazing, good or bad, so be careful what you tell people.
Cheers,
Rob