N.W.M.P. marked Lee Metford carbine

Iron Duke

Regular
EE Expired
Rating - 100%
70   0   0
Anybody have any idea what one of these is worth in very good, all matching condition. According to Phillips and Klancher, only a few of these have surfaced out of 200 originally issued.
 
There was a sporterized one sold on the EE last spring for $175 if I remember correctly.

Actually a wee bit more than that, Sean. I bought it, and it had a cracked receiver, (which I knew about at the time of purchase.)

There is a certain range of known serial numbers to these Carbines, and they are not all in sequence. Because of the scarcity, there have been attempted alterations to some of these in order for unscrupulous people to get a lot of money for them.

Fore-ends have been spliced, (much like some Ross rifles), and non-carbine actions have been used. Bolts and Magazines are very different too.

As mentioned, detailed pictures are necessary to value something like this. Particularly the butt stock, the fore-end, and the action.

However, I will say that a butt stock alone was being advertised for over $300 a while ago.

Lets see some detailed pictures.
.
 
Don't have my camera right now, will post pics asap, but assuming it is as described and authentic, what kind of price range does it fall into?
 
VERY few were totally matching. I think only about a 10% of the entire lot were matching so without pictures and more info ....this post is not going to go anywhere. Sorry
 
Well, after descending into the cave to check it out, the NWMP carbine is a Lee Enfield, the Lee Metford is marked to a Hussar regiment. The Enfield is all matching unless it's been professionally tampered with, the Metford is not matching. Serial number range is correct for the Enfield, I will post some pics when I can,
 
Well, after descending into the cave to check it out, the NWMP carbine is a Lee Enfield, the Lee Metford is marked to a Hussar regiment. The Enfield is all matching unless it's been professionally tampered with, the Metford is not matching. Serial number range is correct for the Enfield, I will post some pics when I can,

Where did the Metford come from? No previous mention of a Metford. Sounds like the OP is looking at buying them and would like to find out a price range.

It would seem, after he "descended into the cave to check it out," that some more detailed information could be posted, such as other markings on it, date of manufacture, barrel length, possible unit numbers, barrel markings, etc., that would help establish a price.
.
 
I'm confused. Only the bolts and receivers are numbered so what's this about 10% matching? Were they all jumbled up when sold off?

Sounds like it's time someone created a list and matched some up.
 
I'm confused. Only the bolts and receivers are numbered so what's this about 10% matching? Were they all jumbled up when sold off?

Sounds like it's time someone created a list and matched some up.

Some of the more advanced collectors have used what RNWMP / RCMP records that are available to come up with a list of serial numbers that are KNOWN Carbines. Many of these have a mis-matched bolt and only about 10% of the known ones have bolt and receiver matching.

Of course, such a list is not "written in stone," and more information comes to light every so often as firearms are found in Estates and other places.

Bolts, Receivers and Barrels are numbered, and there are certain other characteristics that distinguish these RNWMP Carbines from others, or from firearms made up to look like them.

Many advanced collectors notice these little things, and while they do share the information with other serious collectors, we tend to keep some of these little identifiers restricted, otherwise there are unscrupulous people out there that do make up these fakes and forgeries who would also attempt to duplicate these things on their Bogus (and high priced) offerings.

While this might seem selfish, particularly in this day and age where everyone and his dog seems to think that they have the "right" to this inside information, and it should be public for everyone, then I say that you have to earn that "right." I have over 55 years collecting, shooting and handling collectable firearms, and I have put in my dues over that time.

And, we keep notes on these things. I have seven loose leaf binders of these little things that I have found over the years. And, this is why these forums are good, because others like me will be more than happy to identify or help someone out, because they have the information collected over many years.

So, post some good detailed pictures, and we will help out if we can.
.
 
Last edited:
While this might seem selfish, particularly in this day and age where everyone and his dog seems to think that they have the "right" to this inside information, and it should be public for everyone, then I say that you have to earn that "right." I have over 55 years collecting, shooting and handling collectable firearms, and I have put in my dues over that time.
And, we keep notes on these things. I have seven loose leaf binders of these little things that I have found over the years. And, this is why these forums are good, because others like me will be more than happy to identify or help someone out, because they have the information collected over many years.

Great way to generate new blood!

I have been at this along time also.

We could all do some mentoring to keep this alive for future generations.

Sorry, I don't agree.
 
Of course you could buy the book,
Arms & Accroutrements of the Mounted Police (Phillips and Klancher)
Museum Restoration Service
Bloomfield, Ontario 1982
that lists the serial numbers
 
Yes, the books ARE available.

I have one of these things and it has some MOST unusual features, but you have to know what you are looking at in order to identify them. If photos are up, I am more than happy to help out.

But there are people out there who are totally unscrupulous. I am thinking right now of a gunsmith I knew in Vancouver, many years ago, who turned out a dozen or so LUGER CARBINES and sold them AS ORIGINALS to unsuspecting guys who wanted to get a real prize. If you know what you are looking at, the identification as a Fraud is easy. (In this case, a hint: original Carbines were Commercial guns, Commercial guns were not DATED..... and the S..... M...... Carbines all have DATES. Be warned!)

On something as rare, and as valuable, as a really nice RNWMP Carbine, I want to be sure the gun exists BEFORE I ID the thing positively. Remember, we ARE looking at a factor of near 50 to 1 in cash value between one of these in real nice original shape..... and a Bubba-project-gone-wrong....... which can be made to LOOK LIKE the Real Thing.

With the junk I have lying around here, I could fake up some SUPER rarities, had I a mind to become a crook. I am very certain that some other guys on this forum can say likewise. That we have not done so, and will not do so, is a testament to our dedication to this hobby and to our own innate senses of honour and decency and self-respect. We CAN be crooks but we CHOOSE not to.

Can everyone out there say the same?

I think not.

Anybody wanna buy a brand-new 1873 French Modele d"Ordonnance revolver? They were made in .45ACP, you know!
.
 
Just an add I found somewhere....



French 1873. .45 acp good functioning shooter
Sold pending funds.

Ive got a French 1873 in .45acp.

It's a good functional antique. .45 acp so it's easy to get shooting. Some say these are some of the strongest antiques. Another plus is you don't need moon clips!

She has a two minor issues but they don't get in the way of this old gal going bang!!

$875. I'm open to offers and trades.
 
My first try at photo posting, don't laugh too hard



th_IMG_0714.jpg

th_IMG_0707.jpg

th_020.jpg

th_019.jpg

th_018.jpg

th_016.jpg

th_007.jpg

th_003.jpg
 
What a beautiful LITTLE rifle!

I don`t think anyone here would complain at ALL if you were to enlarge those shots to 700px or so width.........

I know that I certainly wouldn`t!
.
 
Back
Top Bottom