NAA - The Earl is here

BabySeal

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
225   0   0
Location
BC
After failing to keep myself calm about the inbound parcel from Kodaik Outpost and watching for the postman with the dog every day, I have finally hit paydirt!

My NAA Earl is here! Now I wish I could post some pics of it in hand, but I cant find the damn camera anywhere! So you'll just have to visit the kodiak website for pics. His are better than what I could take anyway.

http://www.kodiakoutpost.com/earlpics.htm

So while I can not take pictures, I can yammer on about the little gun a bit. MAN is this thing ever small!

Overall its only a couple inches shorter than my 106mm GP100. But its skinny like a pencil in comparison. Gripping the GP 100 after handling the Earl for a while, the custom grips I have installed feel enormous and hand filling.

The first impressions of the Earl are good. It is finely made. In fact, its outward appearance bears a standard of quality that makes comaprisons to Freedom Arms not blasphemous.

The sides of the gun and cylinder are highly polished. The top, bottom and backstrap are matte and feel lightly bead or sand blasted. I think there was some of this sand still in the "loading lever" that secures the cylinder pin because it was a bit sticky the first few times I used it, but it cleared right up.

Before I bought the gun I read about it on Gunblast like I am sure millions of gun owners do. The one that Jeff got had a 3.5lb trigger pull. Mine does not. It feels somewhat heavier than that, near 5-6lbs, but I cant get my trigger pull gauge to stay right on the tip of the tiny trigger where an accurate measurement can be taken. But my finger is pretty accurate.

The heavier trigger pull and the very solid feeling little hammer are subject to a fairly strong, flat mainspring. The rest of the working parts really contribute little to the triggerpul weight in comparison to this strong spring because it is so well made. There is virtualy no drag on the cylinder. There is no perceptible lateral or linear movemtn in the cylinder either. If I could hold it steady, I bet this little thing will shoot some decent groups.

To remove the 5 round cylinder and load it, you have to remove the cylinder from the gun by dropping the faux loading lever and removing the cylinder pin.

Spent rounds are ejected from the cyinder using the pin. Its not rocket science. Its too slow for that.

The gun comes with 2 cylinders; one for .22lr and one for .22wmr. Looking at the balistics data, there doesnt seem to be much of a difference between the two calibers when fired from this pipsqueek. But I am willing to bet that there is a fairly noticeable difference on the firing line.

I cant wait! All in all its a very cool little gun that I am quite happy to have bought.
 
That is definitely a neat looking gun. I love the compact size of it. The fact that it has cylinders for both .22 Lr and .22wmr is icing on the cake in my opinion.
 
Just got mine today as well! I've just spent the last two hours handling it, taking it apart, scrubbing the chambers, etc.

Could you do me a favour and check your bore, BabySeal? Tell me what you see... I agree with you the QC seems top notch, everything's tight and nicely finished, but there's something quite unusual about my Earl's bore. Just wondering if it's normal or if mine's got a problem.
 
LOL

Its not you Cerdan.

I guess they didnt exactly make up a complete batch of CDN legal barrels. They just made up a batch of CDN legal extensions.

The barrel is only rifled for about half its length.

Its a combo barrel! For both solid bullets and shot!

haha.

I dont care. I still think its awesome.

***EDIT***

I just emailed Jeff Quinn to see what he makes of this and to ask if the one he received is the same way.

I also got to thinking about how in my modest experience, that this seems to be rather unique. I have seen barrel extensions that get the muzzles of machine guns outside of turrets, and I have seen old milsurps that have had their muzzles counterbored. Those two examples both have the inside diamtre that matches the depth of the groves or larger.

This barrel has the extention made to the same diametre as the lands. This means that approximately half way down the barrel, those 8 magic little grooves hapilly engraved into the bullet and spinning it madly, abruptly end.

Does this shave off 8 little pieces of jacket? How does this affect the ballistics? It should certainly cause a small pressure spike, but what about the rate of spin? Would it remain constant?

I realize that these musings are pretty trivial. Its just a .22. But what is true for a .22 is also true for a 155mm howitzer, or any other barrel fired projectile. I am just curious about any pros or cons there may be about this barrel wether its by design or defect.
 
Last edited:
Oh bawls....

I am begining to get the feeling that I am going to be waiting a very long time for a replacement....
 
LOL
This barrel has the extention made to the same diametre as the lands. This means that approximately half way down the barrel, those 8 magic little grooves hapilly engraved into the bullet and spinning it madly, abruptly end.

That really doesn't sound good..... I'm sure lead would come out the end but I'm not sure that I would want to shoot it like that. Definitely not right.

If all else on the customer service side fails counter-boring might be one way to go.
 
The wierdest thing is that when you look at it with a flashlight, you can see faint traces of rifling at the smooth muzzle end. Did their broach break half way through or what?
 
Earl pics

Mine has rifling throughout the length of the barrel and the finish looks great all over. All in all I am very happy so far.

Here are pics of the Earl comparing it to the Minimaster. I don't know if my eyes are good enough to see that little front sight. I guess we'll find out on the range. The Earl has a fairly heavy trigger but so did my Minimaster at the start and it has lightened noticeably with use.

minimasterandearl1.jpg


minimasterandearl3.jpg


minimasterandearl2.jpg
 
Oh man... I was all a'quiver with expectations that my own Earl would arrive today. Hopefully tomorrow.

You guys sure aren't helping my patience any.... :D
 
If the barrel is not fully rifled, it could be declared "insufficient length" for the restricted status it has. Apparently, the entire barrel must be rifled to qualify as "actual barrel length".
 
No I didnt.

I dont know if I want to... It might be fine. I've never had to send a gun back before. Well except a Norinco once, but that doesnt count.

I wonder if I can get some sort of tool that will cut or chase the rifling....
 
That sort of work isn't something that you'd want to be doing. If you're sure that it's smooth for a big segment of the barrel and that it's not just a trick of the lighting then it's time to talk to KO and get it back to them in exchange for one that is fully rifled. reaction to The Earl doesn't seem to be as high as with the Mini Master so I'll bet he's got enough to work out an exchange and then deal with NAA on a fix or replacement or some other arrangement.

Mine came in today and as chance would have it the reg was in the mail an hour later. So it went out to the range with me tonight for 100 rounds of LR and 10 rounds of WMR through it. This thing is amazingly accurate and consistent once you get the grip worked out.

Once I clean it I'll check for the rifling and let you know what mine is like. Also I'll do the "family" pictures tomorrow with The Earl and my black powder 1858's.
 
Ur not alone Babyseal

Mine showed up last night with no rifling in the last inch or so of barrel (very obviously not a trick of the light) and NO grips... at all, attached or in the case. :runaway: How does a gun leave the store (warehouse, whatever) without grips on it? How does it leave the factory partially rifled? Oh well, Kodiak has a good rep. Will send him a note today and hope for the best...
 
Mine showed up last night with no rifling in the last inch or so of barrel (very obviously not a trick of the light) and NO grips... at all, attached or in the case. :runaway: How does a gun leave the store (warehouse, whatever) without grips on it? How does it leave the factory partially rifled? Oh well, Kodiak has a good rep. Will send him a note today and hope for the best...

I have no doubt that kodiak will stand by us through this.

I just spent a good hour cleaning the hell out of that barrel and it really looks like whatever tool they used to cut the rifling broke part way through the job.

you can see the faintest attempts at rifling in the muzzle end of the barrel but you can only just feel them by running a toothpick over them.

I cant believe that you go one with no grips though Landro.

I have never seen anything like this. The gun seems so well made with exception to the above so its all even more surprising to me.

Every manufacturer has slip ups. I've seen a remington rifle with no rifling at all, and a Ruger with no stock. I have seen Savages that shipped with rusty barrels. But this is alot of mess ups in one batch.
 
Ok, so it turns out I'm a doofus...

... which will come as no surprise to those who know me.

Kodiak Outpost immediately replied to my email and politely suggested that I give the barrel a thorough scrubbing, just in case the lack of rifling was "a trick of the light" and assured me they would make it right if there was a problem.

Lo and behold, the more I scrubbed, the more the rifling moved up the barrel until I had rifling from one end to the other w:h: Magic!!! It's shallow, but it's definitely there all the way.

However, the scrubbing did not make the grips appear ;) But Kodiak assures me that's an easy fix.

Quality, cute gun. Great service, including very polite after sale support.

(BabySeal, scrub the snot out of the barrel. Perhaps you have magic rifling too...)
 
Back
Top Bottom