bearkilr
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Nowhere, ......just past the middle
That makes two of us.
Native Moose Derby
- Thread starter dgl1948
- Start date
That makes two of us.
Keep in mind "superbrad" that buck had done his breeding for the year. And it was shared...!
They've paid for it locally.
I share my legally harvested deer every year... Sharing shouldn't give someone permission to conduct poor game management practices...
We're lucky those gracious keepers of the earth allow us to hunt at all . . .
Here is some information that can be read at one's convenience.
http://www.uofrpress.ca/publications/Clearing-The-Plains
Excerpted in the link below.
ww.thestarphoenix.com/news/Shameful+history+backed+evidence/9057152/story.html An academic history of Treaty 6, and the starvation of the indigenous people of the west - derived from the National Policy.
On another note: Fishery and game management legislation was not an inspirational political piece of mainstream officials in Upper and Lower Canada. The Legislation and Policy was grafted from Britain. The conception of game policy was designed to protect the game resource(s) for the wealthy, by depriving the locals of their food sources. The method of invention was transferred to the Legislatures in Canada.
I'll provide a brief excerpt below, but for greater details read: Ojibwa Fishing Grounds: A history of ONtario fisheries law, science, and the sportman's challenge to Aboriginal treaty rights, 1650 - 1900.
"In England, a series of early 18th century Acts for the the Preservation of Salmon vested the lords of manors and other owners of fisheries with their exclusive use". These were designed as social controls, "so that England's landed gentry claimed that it's stringent game laws were in the interest of their society and how they justified their monopoly on fish and game". The Upper Canada Acts for the Preservation of Salmon can be readily compared.
http://www.uofrpress.ca/publications/Clearing-The-Plains
Excerpted in the link below.
ww.thestarphoenix.com/news/Shameful+history+backed+evidence/9057152/story.html An academic history of Treaty 6, and the starvation of the indigenous people of the west - derived from the National Policy.
On another note: Fishery and game management legislation was not an inspirational political piece of mainstream officials in Upper and Lower Canada. The Legislation and Policy was grafted from Britain. The conception of game policy was designed to protect the game resource(s) for the wealthy, by depriving the locals of their food sources. The method of invention was transferred to the Legislatures in Canada.
I'll provide a brief excerpt below, but for greater details read: Ojibwa Fishing Grounds: A history of ONtario fisheries law, science, and the sportman's challenge to Aboriginal treaty rights, 1650 - 1900.
"In England, a series of early 18th century Acts for the the Preservation of Salmon vested the lords of manors and other owners of fisheries with their exclusive use". These were designed as social controls, "so that England's landed gentry claimed that it's stringent game laws were in the interest of their society and how they justified their monopoly on fish and game". The Upper Canada Acts for the Preservation of Salmon can be readily compared.
