I'm a bit confused.. Why would you wanna buy a gun you're never gonna shoot?![]()
... more so than the typical (the exception being 1911/2011s).
Talk to anyone who has a substantial amount of rounds/training/matches with a shadow and you will learn they go through parts - more so than the typical (the exception being 1911/2011s).
Spend enough time shooting matches with a high round count gun (unless you enjoy lots of parts swapping as part of your maintenance schedule) and chances are higher you'll have a gun go down during a match.
Just the reality of life with them.
What parts do they go through exactly? I've gone through maybe 4 slidestops in my 4 previous guns with a combined total of around 220,000 rounds. Two extractors, one was from a case failure. 4 extractor pins and one firing pin spring (in the 80,000 round gun). One firing pin, because I bent it by accident. Not a gun problem.
Other than that I've replaced recoil Springs around every 10,000 rounds or so.
I've seen you come to a halt in the middle of a stage - what? Three times with a Shadow? (Albeit one was ammo...)Yes because comparing anything to the perfection of 1911/2011 is just runofthemill typical
Hoping you guys can help out....I've shot a G34 for a while now and love it, but looking to get something good for IPSC production. Also want to use it for 3 gun and possible IDPA production as well.
So far I've considered
CZ SP-01 shadow (honestly, with all the positive reviews I don't know how to don't have one already)
CZ SP-01 shadow line
Stock II
Stock III
The stocks don't make weight in IDPA, which is a drawback for me since I do shoot sanctioned matches from time to time.
Any advice? I've have different people recommend all three, am I missing any different guns?
slidestops should be considered a consumable part just like springs.
Yes the factory 10 rounders suck balls. But there are few people that will ever shoot their gun enough to warrant worrying about them.
I've seen you come to a halt in the middle of a stage - what? Three times with a Shadow? (Albeit one was ammo...)
If you are looking for gun for all three then you likely will end up with a compromise. The gun will be excellent for one or two of the three you listed and will work for the third. Because the Tanfoglios you listed are to heavy for IDPA they don't fit your criteria. This leaves you with the SP-01 Shadow. The Tactical is essentially the same gun, built on a different frame without the goodies you want for playing the games.
You like the Glocks and do quite well with them. My opinion stick with your Glock 17 - change the springs out to get back to a 5#+ trigger, put a decent set of FO sights on the gun (Savigny sights are great) and play all three disciplines.
I am not sure why the Glock 17/M&P Pro have not taken off in IPSC Production but the two guns have in IDPA. The sports are different and IDPA does favour the lighter polymer guns with their 2.5 - 3lb triggers vs the DA first pull of the CZ style guns but there are other reasons as well.
It always is the archer not the arrow and I am sure the Glock 17 in the hands of somebody who can shoot can and would run with any of the guns you mentioned in your posts. Your G 34 is legal in IDPA SSP/ESP Divisions and your G 17 is legal in IPSC Production. Since Vogel won IPSC Production Division using a G 17 and finished an hour glass ahead of everyone else in SSP Division using a G 34 you already have half of the equation to be a World Champion :>).
Good luck with your decision.
Take Care
Bob
ps I just rediscovered my Tanfoglio "L" and will use it in Standard Division next year using the 40cal top end. I could be a threat......
Bob,
IDPA rules changed recently, weight was upped to 43oz, Shadow will be below that, he can use Shadow now with no mods.




























