Need help identifying "AUSTRALIA" rings and bases

Maybe to help - I have never worked with World Class bases before - mostly Weaver stuff. On Brownell's website they used to have (maybe still do) a spreadsheet showing dimensions of the various bases - curvature that they were cut to fit, spacing of the through holes, etc. Apparently the idea was that any ring with that spacing dimension would fit on that rifle - but some brands bases needed their brand rings to work (example Parker Hale) - some did not - so, could "mix and match" Redfield and Leupold "turn in" style, for example. The rings should be identical to each other - any height difference is done with the bases - not the rings - of course, Ruger had to be different about that. But Warne, Leupold, Tasco, etc. all seemed to make rings as same height pairs - is possible that you may want or need taller or shorter rings - depends on the mounting on the rifle, the clearance at bolt handle, the clearance above barrel. The very best is as mentioned above - a number or mark that identifies what it is for - then knowing what brand it is, one can usually find a reference to say what the base is used for - note that some bases are used as a front base on some rifles and a rear base on other rifles - goes to the mounting hole spacing - not just the curvature underneath the base.
 
Possibly made by Hillver in Australia for Tasco
In which case probably for CZ ZKK 600 and BSA Monarch rifles.
It could also be 26mm vs 1 inch
Might want to measure it.

I have a Monarch and IIRC it’s also the same footprint as Remington 700 but I could be mistaken
 
I recently acquired a Tasco World Class base for a T/C Contender, which is why I recognized the system. I just checked the base and it has no markings on it of any kind. If it wasn't in its original packaging, I would have no idea what it was for.

Looks like it's for a bolt action, given how the mounting stud is outboard of the screw holes on just one of the bases.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DGY
Back
Top Bottom