5 is the limit in Canada so you can't get them here.
100% illegal to possess anything greater than 5rd in a mag fed semi auto. Even if the Sap 6 mags fit (they don't) it would not be like the pistol mags in a semi auto rifle it would be illegal! This is Canada know your gun laws or ho to jail.
I predict all of these magazines being designated as dual-usage mags in the near future.
Everything pinned to 5 rounds. Pump or auto.
The only semi-autos out of the current round that came in, are the Uzkon (because the importer got slapped by Miramachi for trying to pull a fast one - long story).
The Derya, Alpharms, and Asena mag fed shotguns all take the same magazines.The ones made specifically for the semi-autos have a notch in the back of the top of the mag that allow a spring loaded tab in the back of the follower to pop out as it reaches the top and activate the last shot bolt hold open.
This notch is not present in the mags made for the pumps, as well as the little tab that pops out of it is not present in the follower for these mags.
HOWEVER
The mags for the pumps will seat and feed in the semi-autos.
As Innercity pointed out, Bulletin #72 is very clear on how this plays out legally. The mags designed for the pumps are legal - as a manual action centre fire, they are not subject to capacity limits. They are distinct from the mags that are designed for the semis. The fact that they fit and function in the semi autos is a happy coincidence.
So, if you have a Derya, Alpharms, or Asena 12 gauge mag fed semi autio... Buy a 10 rounder for the pump shotguns, slap it in, unload it by repeated pulling of the trigger, rinse, repeat. You will have broken exactly zero laws in the process.
If you own an Uzkon... sorry about your luck. The mags for the pumps will not seat properly because Miramachi made the importer have the mag catch location altered.
p.s. Yes, I have personally tested this. Other than the last shot bolt hold open not activating, the 10 rounders are as reliable in these guns as the 5 rounders (so, not very reliable).
I was under the impression that because they are designed center fire mags that makes them illegal. Just like if someone were to make a 10 round bolt mag that happen to fit a semi auto that would also be illegal?
CFO office confirmed it was infact illegal for any more than 5 rnds to be fired from a semi auto mag fed shotgun even if the 10rounders fit? Are they wrong, is this a grey area or is this infact an illegal act?
It comes down to what the mag was designed for, not what it actually functions in.
This is why we get 10 round pistol mags working in carbine rifles without breaking the law. The same principle applies here. And there are a number of existing examples.
A key reason why the Australia International Arms .308 Enfields, and their 10 round mags, command the price they do, is because the mags just happen to fit and function in M1A style rifles (like the Norc M305 rifles).
10 round LAR pistol mags sell like hotcakes because they work fine in any 5.56 AR, and most of the 5.56 Non R semit auto rifles (like the Tavor, Su-16, Type 97, etc. etc.)
Same goes for the 5 round Beowulf mags - they only hold 5 rounds of .50 Beowulf, but will hold 14-15 rounds of 5.56 (depending on the pinning job) and work in any rifle that can take AR style mags.
Still nice and legal.
Any of the Non-R and R carbines that accept Glock pistol mags... 10 rounds. Good to go.
There are a lot of examples of how this works.
And again, with these mags, there is a visible, physical difference between the semi auto mags, and the pump action mags.
Will a random RCMP or other LEO know the law? Unlikely. And you will likely end up with some s'plaining to do at the police station. But you'll get your gun, mags, and freedom back as soon as they call Miramachi.
Yes but those are diffrent cases altogether,
1. Pistol mags
2. Beowulf mags (just like a 3.5" shotgun tube, just fitting more smaller rounds than designed for
The shotgun mag is neither situation, if this was the case a company would make millions by designing a mag for a bolt action .223 IE: Mossberg MVP that is 30rnd then out gun laws are mute... There is a reason this doesn't work it's illegal because it's not a pistol mag it's a "center fire" mag designed for a center fire gun.
Yes but those are diffrent cases altogether,
1. Pistol mags
2. Beowulf mags (just like a 3.5" shotgun tube, just fitting more smaller rounds than designed for
The shotgun mag is neither situation, if this was the case a company would make millions by designing a mag for a bolt action .223 IE: Mossberg MVP that is 30rnd then out gun laws are mute... There is a reason this doesn't work it's illegal because it's not a pistol mag it's a "center fire" mag designed for a center fire gun.
4. Magazines designed for one firearm but used in a different firearm
The maximum permitted capacity of a magazine is determined by the kind of firearm it is designed or manufactured for use in and not the kind of firearm it might actually be used in. As a consequence, the maximum permitted capacity remains the same regardless of which firearm it might be used in.
Blah, Blah, Blah.
Yes. Everyone already knows everything you're saying. Everyone is familiar with LAR and Beowulf mags etc.
But these mags are specifically (and blatantly) designed to pretend to be different mags.
It's my opinion that they're poking a hornets nest by selling these so called "pump only" magazines.
Time will tell I guess.




























