Need to double that pile before the election, for support against a BAN.

I like this idea, when my rpal arrives my goal is to have minimum 5 restricted firearms by elections or years end.
However, we must do all we can to increas the numbr of households that have rpals and restricted firearms. The idea is to make the number of addresses for collection exhaustive.
Buy and Convince others to take their rpal.
Most sponsors will hold the restricted for you if you pay for it and are waiting for the rpal to arrive, so if you see something you like and a sale is on, ask them. You don't have to miss out on a hopefully good sale!
 
I'm building a Ruger MK1 pistol clone from scratch. That counts, too! It's time to register the receiver; I'll let you guys know how that goes. Btw, the registered part of the receiver on the Ruger is the upper, which is a relatively simple piece of tubing.

Hmm... so one could get a few 8' pieces of tubing from Home Depot, cut them to length, serialize, and register as custom made Ruger Mark Z receivers
 
I would think the first sponsor/retailer that puts on the C71 sale, will get a lot of the business! If Tradex does it, i will need a second mortgage!
 
I need to double that pile of restricted certificates of handguns before the 2019 federal election to show support against any gun ban.

We wont be an easy prey to bring down, au contraire, i believe we will prevail in the end, everyone must support by purchasing another brand new restricted handgun or AR. Numbers are our allieds in stopping this liberal agenda.

I am on my way of doing it.

SAM_4434_zpsckitzswf.jpg

I'm taking a different route. I'm getting more new people to buy their first restricted. I am of the opinion that it's not the number of guns with the voters, but the number of voters with guns.

-S.
 
That is awesome and needed but the issue with the time frame is they most likely won't be approved in time before the stats are needed.

Exact, buying more new restricteds will have an effect on the coming election, i will buy another one in the weekend.
 
That is awesome and needed but the issue with the time frame is they most likely won't be approved in time before the stats are needed.

I'm ahead of the curve. I've got seven people to get their R/PALS and their first restricted firearms. That's seven more votes from one guy. How many votes does this add? The libs don't care about how many guns you have. They care about votes.

I've not been idle. I've been working on changing minds. I'm not givin' up. We're outta time when we're outta time.

-S.
 
I'm ahead of the curve. I've got seven people to get their R/PALS and their first restricted firearms. That's seven more votes from one guy. How many votes does this add? The libs don't care about how many guns you have. They care about votes.

I've not been idle. I've been working on changing minds. I'm not givin' up. We're outta time when we're outta time.

-S.
This is good work sir but as stated by Wendy cukier, if ever restricteds number reach 2 millions we wont be able to ban them.

I will buy a 2 new restricteds + a month until the election for support against a BAN.
 
I did my bit I got my MOM to take a firearms course and get her RPAL, she wants a revolver now ! …. she's 67 and i'm pretty stoked about that.
 
Originally Posted by rangebob
Dr. Najma Ahmed - recent evidence of world body of literature. Langmann's methodology is weak, did not include suicides (semi-false), did not include injuries, including only completed homicides. Mauser's report has never been cited in the medical literature, and doesn't appear anywhere that physicians study Gun Disease.

Cukier : Mauser's CCW study, was funded by the NRA. He took the sample and extrapolated the number of people in the country, and compared it to Hemingway's study where UFOs were seen. [Irony here that she formerly talked about sample sizes being applicable for number of domestic guns, but here she disagrees with it] World Health Organization are on the side of accessibility thesis, and regulation of firearms.

Senator Pratte: 2013 is not significant?

Cukier : Interesting point. Inflection point, or dramatic reversal in trend. In general with progressive strengthening there's been a decline in suicide, in domestic homicide. Australian success success story, Canadian we've seen a reversal in that trend. It's early to say that it will continue for the next decade. Now we have 1 million restricted, in 10 years we'll have 2 million and it'll be impossible to reverse that trend. We've seen a relaxation of controls without any benefits, and why would legislators not want to include public safety rather than putting it in jeopardy.
 
I'm a CFSC/CRFSC instructor and have found more and more people getting their restricted over the last 14 months where before it as 50% doing the non restricted would opt for the restricted now its 75-80% opting for their restricted!
 
Back
Top Bottom