New .50 came home tonight..

gunwhore.gif


gunattentionwhore.gif
 
US Optics!

On the Bushnell 3200 10X suggestion, hey Ronnie Barrett has it as one of 2 choices for a "factory installed" scope on his .50's and I think he know's just a little about .50's.
 
Well there is a case of each in there.....

Ardent said:
...oh my, I just dabble, but off the top of my head I'd say that's gotta be $2200-2500 of wine there... I'm likely way off. The '90 Margaux... insert envy here. ;)


wanna drop by and kill a bottle or two? I was gonna invite Deckard over to watch Blade Runner anyways:)
 
Ardent said:
Hahahahaha, yes, you are kidding. :eek: :runaway: I hope.
Not kidding, this is not a gun to "toss around", you anchor it, aim at target, stationary target that is, and fire, cross hairs on 10X scope is all you need. (or want), choose proper base,
20 or 40 MOA for 1000 or 1500 yards, have fun, plink away.
 
Ardent said:
Not to mention it will likely get killed on top of a .50... A $300 scope on this rifle? I'd bet this rifle will easily be wearing $3000 glass.
It's the $3000 scope that's going to get killed, not the Bushnell fixed 10X.
 
Damn Strangeday, if your wine collection is anything like your gun collection for size, then your wife shouldn't be worried about what you spend on firearms. That is a couple of nice bottles you have there. If I were you, I would decant a bottle and have a glass for all us jealous folks. Cheers!
 
Vic777 said:
It's the $3000 scope that's going to get killed, not the Bushnell fixed 10X.

I say my comments having tried the 3200 mildot 10x40... twice. I didn't learn the first time... Now my rig wears Leupold Mk4 M1's, never looked back. The adjustments on the 3200 are nowhere near as sharp and accurate as the Mk4, the optics look smoked at long range in comparison, I quickly ran out of elevation, and moving your head around will alter point of impact due to no paralax adjustment (not joking, try it :eek: ).

For a $250-$275 scope, it's great, but on rigs of this value...
 
Back
Top Bottom