New addition to the herd, in .375 Ruger no less!

cam1936

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
57   0   1
Location
Central Alberta
Back story: A few of my hunting friends are heading to Africa this spring. I really wanted to join, but a baby on the way and a new house this last summer means I can't go. However, I do plan on going the next time around for plains game and, if circumstances allow it, cape buffalo.

So I've been passively looking at rifles for the purpose. First thought was the CZ 550, but after using a friend’s in both .375 H&H and .416 Rigby they just feel gigantic on me. I'm 6' and about 200 lbs with a medium frame. I'd say I'm a pretty average sized shooter and that CZ felt huge. LOP seemed longer than the stated 13.75" (I prefer 13.25" anyways) and the rifle felt chunky, long (why do you need a 25" barrel on a .375?) and heavy. The weight is welcome in a .416 and up, but a medium bore really doesn't require a 9 lb+ rifle to mitigate recoil, it's just not that bad.

So I fondled a Model 70 Safari, which felt much more refined than the 550. Bolt throw felt better and the barrel is an inch shorter. LOP is still 13.75" which I find too long, but it felt like it fit better than the 550. Still, the rifle is 9lbs unscoped. That is great in a .458, but in a .375 that is going to pull double duty as a North American big game rifle it is just too heavy and in a medium bore the weight just isn't necessary for recoil reduction.

I then thought about a RSM in .375 H&H. I love Rugers and the RSM is a much nicer rifle IMO than the model 70 and the 550 (god I love the quarter rib, it just looks so right.) However, again it's a big, heavy rifle.

Another friend has a .416 Ruger in an Alaskan. I liked this rifle. Sights were great, the rifle was relatively light and compact. Recoil was stout, but not unmanageable. I'm a sucker for walnut and blued wood though, especially so on a rifle that will one day see Africa.

So I started to passively look for a Ruger African. Surfing CGN I found a post about Prairie Gun Traders and looked at their website and sure enough they had a Ruger African in .375 Ruger in stock for $899. Although it's tough buying when not being able to see it in person I figured I could always sell it if it didn't fit me so I pulled the trigger.

First impressions: I really think this rifle fills a niche. It's an African style rifle with Walnut, blued steel, great iron sights and a barrel mounted sling stud. However, it's not 9 + lbs, nor is it long, chunky or clumsy. It feels like any other rifle Ruger makes. Smooth bolt throw, slim in the stock (which I like) LOP at 13.5". Out of the box it just felt right to me. Certainly more so than the bigger competitors.

Brass and dies were found in stock at my local gun store. Granted my local gun store is Prophet River.

I loaded up some 270 grain Hornady SPs. I've only shot 5 rounds to test function. It performed great, obviously more rounds are needed to make sure it cycles flawlessly in all conditions with different bullet styles. Recoil is stout, certainly more so than an 11 lb scoped CZ 550 in .375 H&H. It is manageable and I still maintain that a 9lb rifle really is not needed until you get into the big bores. I'll have to update with a real range report.

Here it is beside my .300 H&H:
IMG_3701_zps0a4cf920.jpg

33e72876-8f7d-4e77-a5c3-f4edb6e56cdf_zps8d49a988.jpg

IMG_3698_zpsda1615c5.jpg


What is the CGN consensus on the Ruger African? Do you think it should be more heavily built like its competitors? This rifle with a scope, sling and 4 rounds will weigh in the same range as the other safari rifles bare.
 
That is a great gun. I have one in 9.3x62 and it shoots very well. I removed the forend pressure point, had the trigger done, and installed a Wolf firing pin spring. Excellent value here. Weight and stock fit are your friend in anything .375 or bigger. Sounds like the fit is good for you. It would look really good with a straight tube 1.5-5 power scope. Congrats on your purchase!
 
If you're going to throw a variable on it, go with the Leupold 1.75-6X with a Heavy Duplex - that's what I have on mine, and it is WAY better IMHO than the straight tubed 1.5-5X Leupold, especially when it comes to flat shooting light at dawn and dusk - there's no comparison.

Or, there's nothing wrong with a straight 2 1/2X, 3X, 4X, etc. Now that I have my Alaskan Arms QD rings, I'm seriously considering putting a spare Leupold 4x33 Heavy Duplex on it, as the variable seems to live on 4x anyway.
 
I'm eyeing the Sightron 1-7. True 1x on the low and 7x is more than enough to take game at reasonable hunting ranges.

Darn is the .375 ever vesatile. A 260 grain Accubond (BC of .473) going 2850 fps with a 7 power scope can easily take game at 400 yards, which is as far as I've ever shot anything even on the prairies. And yet you can load up 300 grain Barnes or 350 grain Woodleighs and take cape buffalo.
 
You will be very happy with your NEW KING! :) It's well known that it is the finest .375 caliber cartridge ever designed.

You might want to bed the wood stock, I hear it's a good idea with rifles that have somewhat stout recoil ;)
 
Darn is the .375 ever vesatile. A 260 grain Accubond (BC of .473) going 2850 fps with a 7 power scope can easily take game at 400 yards, which is as far as I've ever shot anything even on the prairies. And yet you can load up 300 grain Barnes or 350 grain Woodleighs and take cape buffalo.

Yep, just like old H&H has been doing for 100 years or so. ;) Another lighter weight option would have been the M70 Alaskan.
 
If you're going to throw a variable on it, go with the Leupold 1.75-6X with a Heavy Duplex - that's what I have on mine, and it is WAY better IMHO than the straight tubed 1.5-5X Leupold, especially when it comes to flat shooting light at dawn and dusk - there's no comparison.

Or, there's nothing wrong with a straight 2 1/2X, 3X, 4X, etc. Now that I have my Alaskan Arms QD rings, I'm seriously considering putting a spare Leupold 4x33 Heavy Duplex on it, as the variable seems to live on 4x anyway.

I'm seriously looking at a 2.5x20 Leupold Ultralight, about as small as a use full scope can be. Apart for specific applications most folk over scope their rifles for general purpose use, under 300yds all you need is some clear cross hairs for the most part imho.
 
I'm seriously looking at a 2.5x20 Leupold Ultralight, about as small as a use full scope can be. Apart for specific applications most folk over scope their rifles for general purpose use, under 300yds all you need is some clear cross hairs for the most part imho.

I had one on my .416 for awhile, with the Heavy Duplex. With careful target choice it was OK on the range and had every indication of being unbreakable. It is a great combination of short eye-piece and long eye-relief if not getting hit is your highest priority. That's the good part.

The bad part was when I got it into the field. What seemed to be bright enough at high noon on a range turned into a dim little darkness gathering POS in the bush. You really should get into a situation where you have a buffalo herd on 3 sides of you, a bull at 20 yards and crosshairs you can barely see. It's quite invigorating, in a frustrating sort of way. I couldn't get it off the rifle fast enough when I got home, reasoning that anything I could do with 2.5 fixed could also be done with a higher quality variable set at 2.5. It is one of the very few Leupolds that I ever sold, and the 1.75-6 that replaced it is what should have been on the rifle to begin with.
 
For my Alaskan, I picked a VXR 1.25-4X20 with the "Firedot 4" reticle, which is like a German #4 with an illuminated dot in the centre. Will do some serious testing with it this month and report back, but it seemed like a good choice for this type of gun.

And on point with the OP; that's a nice rifle indeed. Had I not got such a friendly deal on my Alaskan over the EE, I might have held out for an African, as I do like the classic looks.
 
Congrats on your new rifle. I have the same one in south paw. Action has been bedded, swapped out the trigger for a Spec Tech adjustable, and added a Limbsaver recoil pad. For optics I mounted a Vortex Viper 2-7X32 in Warne QDs. I love the way this rifle fits. It mounts very easily and naturally. I may switch out the scope mounts for those Alaska Arms QDs that jaycee has. My only druther would be to have a barrel band sling mount. I have a first gen. with the sling swivel in the fore end. Enjoy!!
 
My .375ruger just took 2 moose and a wolf last weekend. (Alaskan with the overmold stock................I must be the only guy that loves those stocks. I have another 2 Howa rifles with those Hogue stocks also) Now it has a tally of 5 animals and counting. Correction, 5 animals that never took a single extra step and their demise was nothing short of breath-taking. I really think that it is an awesome round. Reloading for it, (other than almost "hanging off the reloading press" to give the brass the oomph it needs to re-size) is a pure joy, and I gave up fiddling with COAL. It shoots great with almost EVERYTHING I have loaded for it. I used to hear that .375's were inherently accurate for some reason, NOW I KNOW IT TO BE TRUE.
The wolf was taken with 235gr speer bullets, and the moose both saw 300gr X-bullets.
 
Back
Top Bottom