New and improved: the BRS-99 Tactical

[mmattockx]

Or a barrel shroud like the HK94.

A shroud wouldn't look too bad, IMO.

Not having a sub machinegun at all looks even worse.

+1.


Mark

 

[Deckard]

Not having a sub machinegun at all looks even worse.

Yeah, who could have but didn't get an HK94? I found a used on for $600 in the day and passed on it. Arg!

 

[G37]

I did a rough 18.6" Photoshop to as accurate as I could, it'd look roughly like this:

Kills the look? Yes.
However, if it didn't add (or add much) to the final cost I'd definitely take one for the ability to play with it outside.

 

[MosinNagantM44]

Butt ugly.

 

[MegaMonkeyChunk]

I did a rough 18.6" Photoshop to as accurate as I could, it'd look roughly like this:

Kills the look? Yes.
However, if it didn't add (or add much) to the final cost I'd definitely take one for the ability to play with it outside.

I said I wouldn't post it, but just for comparison:

 

[Curtton]

I did a rough 18.6" Photoshop to as accurate as I could, it'd look roughly like this:

yeah, thats about right .

 

[Deckard]

I am focussing on seeing Liberals s**t themselves at its unrestricted, unregistered sight. That's a happy thought. Meanwhile I think think the straight stock will make using the iron sights tough.

 

[Mr. Cam]

with a tasteful hand-guard covering some of the barrel, the non-restricted might just look like a carbine, and be comfortable to point and shoot. With that long barrel, there certainly would be a lot of weight forward.

 

[sillymike]

Kind of look like a mosquitoes...

 

[Verdical Driver]

with a tasteful hand-guard covering some of the barrel, the non-restricted might just look like a carbine, and be comfortable to point and shoot. With that long barrel, there certainly would be a lot of weight forward.

But if you wanted a carbine, wouldn't there be a lot better options?

 

[Until the Angels Fall]

Kind of look like a mosquitoes...

LOL...it really does. It should have a little catch pharse like..."this little bugger really has a bite"

 

[the_klenzer]

I did a rough 18.6" Photoshop to as accurate as I could, it'd look roughly like this:

Kills the look? Yes.
However, if it didn't add (or add much) to the final cost I'd definitely take one for the ability to play with it outside.

You know it might not be that bad if 3/4 of the barrel was covered with a fake can.

 

[5440fight]

You know it might not be that bad if 3/4 of the barrel was covered with a fake can.

Yeah, if it wasn't for her face, and personality, she'd be hot. not.
It isn't going to get a 10 rnd mag regardless, I'll settle for a range gun. What we really need is to allow restricted use on crown land, or for hunting.

 

[the_klenzer]

Yeah, if it wasn't for her face, and personality, she'd be hot. not.
It isn't going to get a 10 rnd mag regardless, I'll settle for a range gun. What we really need is to allow restricted use on crown land, or for hunting.

Think of the can like a bag over the head.

You're not wrong though, of course.

 

[Jay]

It isn't going to get a 10 rnd mag regardless, I'll settle for a range gun. What we really need is to allow restricted use on crown land, or for hunting.

What we really need is for silly firearm 'classifications' & mag limits to go away... Only the law abiding listen to these laws & they are impotent in preventing gun crime.

But YES, I agree with you, the BRS is one HOT little piece!!!

Cheers
Jay

 

[NickHTK]

Yep. I like it. Looks better than the original IMHO.

 

[bfiles]

Does anyone have any pics of the camo BRS??????

Really want to see what it looks like.