New Arrival: Surplus IWI Micro Tavor X95 Parts Kit!

How unreliable are the Tavors that everyone is desperately looking for parts? I have seen a few posts where people are asking for parts. Are these problematic? In the reviews, everyone seems to be thrilled with them and their reliability, yet other posters are begging for parts. Then you have this kit that costs more than the Tavor itself. Can anyone shed some light on the reliability? How are the Tavors?

Anything can fail... better to be prepared than to be left with a paper weight.
 
Isn't the trigger pack the same one used by the IDF for a fully functional military firearm? Is that perhaps what people think they're buying with this parts kit?

No the internal chassis is the same as the FA one
The gun itself was not capable of FA it’s just that it’s technically an FA model due to the chassis being the same.. even though iwi lists the msw as semi
Basically it shares a part in common with FA and that part isn’t the trigger or sear and we can’t get those so the msw was not capable of FA but qualified as being converted from FA so.. prohib
 
No the internal chassis is the same as the FA one
The gun itself was not capable of FA it’s just that it’s technically an FA model due to the chassis being the same.. even though iwi lists the msw as semi
Basically it shares a part in common with FA and that part isn’t the trigger or sear and we can’t get those so the msw was not capable of FA but qualified as being converted from FA so.. prohib

Not exactly correct.
 
No the internal chassis is the same as the FA one
The gun itself was not capable of FA it’s just that it’s technically an FA model due to the chassis being the same.. even though iwi lists the msw as semi
Basically it shares a part in common with FA and that part isn’t the trigger or sear and we can’t get those so the msw was not capable of FA but qualified as being converted from FA so.. prohib

Most of this is incorrect. It is in everyone's best interest to stop spreading false information. Especially if you did not disassemble the MSW yourself. Anyone who did so is very aware of what is inside.
 
Most of this is incorrect. It is in everyone's best interest to stop spreading false information. Especially if you did not disassemble the MSW yourself. Anyone who did so is very aware of what is inside.

What he said! And trust me, I've disassembled a few.
 
Last edited:
Anyone who did so is very aware of what is inside.

I did. And I was as surprised as everyone else that cracked one open.

For anyone willing to take on the parts kit conversion just know that the receiver insert on a standard x95 can't take the MSW bolt carrier unless you grind off the MSW sear wings on the bottom or use an end mill on the civi inside receiver bolt channel. Milling the channel is not recommended for obvious reasons.
 
Last edited:
Most of this is incorrect. It is in everyone's best interest to stop spreading false information. Especially if you did not disassemble the MSW yourself. Anyone who did so is very aware of what is inside.

It’s not
I talked to the rcmp and iwi when I asked why I had to give it up
Go look in Your own and see for yourself
I have had 10 tavors of all models, the msw was my 10th..
I took mine apart myself like all the rest

It’s you who are mistaken or haven’t taken it apart compared to another model .. and inadvertently spreading “off” info
 
could you summarize what are the proper info? thanks

If you are interested in a summary of what makes this prohibited, I would point you toward any future “expert” testimony/opinion that the RCMP’s lawyers present for s74 hearings for MSW cert revocations. Hopefully they are publicly accessible, once decided.

I’ll give $kull the benefit of the doubt, he might have a firearm that got caught up in this mess whose registration shouldn’t have been revoked. But I think that, unfortunately in this case, that’s the exception not the rule.
 
Back
Top Bottom