new Bipods

shotgunjoe

CGN Regular
Rating - 100%
69   0   0
Location
winnipeg mb
There is a positive plethora of new bipods being made for f/class shooting.I am looking for information from people who actually used the newer units as to there likes ,dislikes, positive features , negatives etc..
As an example; Rempel, which I use, easy to adjust, easy to mount, good solid platform, very nice solid construction, good machining built for a lifetime of use.
Negatives, heavier than a 20 year old virgins heart at the end of the world.
 
Mystic Precision F/TR Pod. Likes: easy to assemble, good machining, wide platform at max adjustment, easy to adjust on variable surfaces, solid, very light weight, priced well and looks cool too. Cons include adaptors for different mounting styles to be developed, plastic knobs, adequate verticle adustment but could be developed for more (at a cost of weight and materials of course),...cant find any more cons at this time. Wont go wrong there IMO. Elky...
 
Trakker

Trakker bipod from the Dolphin Gun Company (U.K.).

Pro's: Lightweight (1.5 lbs), good wide footprint, high quality, stable, one hand elevation adjustment, adjustable for cant, reasonbably priced ($260.00 CDN landed on my door).

Con's: mounting options I guess, swivel stud OR accessory rail, can't do both with one bipod.

Haven't used it a whole bunch yet, but very happy so far.

P1050030.jpg
 
I've got my order in for the MPod, Mystic said he's hoping for Februaury delivery. Can't wait to try it out. I've always fired off a rest and took my time before going out to buy a bipod that wasn't a Harris style. As nice as the Rembles look I just can't see myself hauling around that kind of weight.

Will post some comments on the bipod when I get it.
 
Never use a Remple bi-pod because once you go Remple, you never go ....you never go..... WTF rhymes with Remple?

Anyway, I loooooove mine and would not give it up for all the tea in Britain.
 
The CF-SS Bipod from Star Shooter is among the best, both in price and design. Check out their website ]w ww.star-shooter.com I can see lots of these being sold.


no linking to non sponsors please
 
Never use a Remple bi-pod because once you go Remple, you never go ....you never go..... WTF rhymes with Remple?

Anyway, I loooooove mine and would not give it up for all the tea in Britain.


Once you go Remple.....you'll never leave the temple...... best I could come up with...and I love mine, and everything else he as built for me.
 
IMG_5017.jpg


Remple plate adaptor now available.

IMG_4803.jpg


Pic rail adaptor now available.

IMG_4813.jpg


T slot ready - will fit two most common rail sizes - Choate and Anschutz.

As with all things, compromise vs a set of goals. The biggest goal for me was weight. The red pod pictured scales in at a feathery 14oz making it the lightest F class suitable pod that I am aware of.

Less weight in the pod, more weight in barrels, stocks and scopes.

I did test various hardware including the alloy and cast variants. Way heavier. The OEM type polymer used in the included hardware is unlikely to fail under normal use. It is strong.

The design features I feel make it unique in the market are the INCREASED foot print the taller you raise the pod/rifle. Every other pod on the market requires their feet to narrow to raise the rifle. So the taller you go, the more wobbly the set up can become.

The raised roll centers on each leg. Taking some hints from Euro sniper rifles, I wanted to SUSPEND the rifle from the pod. This meant raising the roll center of the legs.

With the roll points equal to the boreline and the mass of the rifle UNDER these points, the rifle isn't tippy and doesnt torque under recoil. I am designing a new stock that will lower the CG of the rifle even more.

Most pods have the rifle ON TOP making the balance more like a top balancing on a point. Increased hardware is needed to keep the rifle from torquing over. That increases bulk and weight.

With the rifle slung below, the rifle acts more like a keel on a boat and wants to return to center. This self correcting feature reduces the need for the pod to "muscle" the rifle's torque. Simple but very effective.

Putting the roll centers wide apart also reduces the chances of torquing during recoil. The pod does track very nicely.

Even though the pod is light, it will easily support a 50lbs rifle. The orig supported over 200lbs so we figured we could lighten things up a notch. By design, the legs will not slide under load (with the knob tightened of course). The harder you push, the tighter the legs stay - until failure. But are easily moved when needed - loosen knob, move the leg.

On and off with a 1/2 twist of the new lever knob.

Legs remove very quickly so the whole unit can lie flat for easier storage. In fact, I put my pod in my rifle case. Try that with any other pod.

The new version will have a Type 3 milspec anodised finish and modern design for the plate cutouts.

So strong, stable, light, easy to use, durable. Would work great for those into LR hunting and varminting. We are using this pod on heavy 338LM's to shoot out beyond 1 mile.

Spotting our own hits is easy.

The compromises - to keep weight at a min, the central elevation adjustment on many pods was not added. The legs are manually raised and lowered independently. Height and cant are easily adjusted for. Small adjustments when shooting are handled by the rear bag as most of us do now.

It takes about the same time to set up and once on center, the rear bag handles the rest. We are working on a central elevation unit AND a rear adjustable stock.

I offer a simple guarantee with my pods. Buy it, try it. If you dont like it, return it and get a full refund PLUS the cost of return postage.

Like all things, it has compromises BUT what it does, it does very well.

Enjoy...

Jerry
 
Mystic Precision F/TR Pod. Likes: easy to assemble, good machining, wide platform at max adjustment, easy to adjust on variable surfaces, solid, very light weight, priced well and looks cool too. Cons include adaptors for different mounting styles to be developed, plastic knobs, adequate verticle adustment but could be developed for more (at a cost of weight and materials of course),...cant find any more cons at this time. Wont go wrong there IMO. Elky...

We offer custom length legs so you can get whatever you want.

The height range was decided after shooting at a vareity of ranges during the F class season and field shooting locally.

For prone and bench work, the range covers what I feel most will want with conventional stocks and terrain.

For situations were you are shooting well uphill, we found it much simpler and more stable to just put a hunk of wood under the legs then try for longer legs.

But anything is possible.

We are finishing up the first pods suitable for a 3" forend. Another variant for sporter stocks could be ready for testing come spring.

The design is modular enough, we can accomodate alot of different configurations.

Jerry
 
I agree, the range of adjustment works well off a bench or raised prone platforms like we use. So far at our range the legs are adequate with my sporter style stock. A flat based TR stock may be a bit dodgy as it rides higher right?? (havnt confirmed or tried one to be sure). If you are say on a hill or uneven piece of dirt then the board trick may come in handy. The pod is working very well for me Jerry.

For example, at 300m, I have about 3/4 inch left in adjustment on the legs. 500m on our range is handled fine. Never shot 1000 so not sure how that would relate into things.
Cheers.
 
Last edited:
hi guys and girls

this is the new bypod that i have been using lately,its made by a fellow canadian its the bypod from star shooter bypods.its made with cabon fiber legs and is very very well made and as solid as a rock it has a built in cant lever with a wheel adjustment underneath for fine adjustment for elevation,you can literaly adjust it to the fines quarter moa if needed.

at the lowest position the height is 4 in a half inches high with a width of 19 inches.
at the highest position the height is 9 in a half inches high with a width of 14 inches.it weighs a respectable 1 pound 14 oz.


this is one of the most solid bypods i have used,you can load it or shoot it free recoil your choice.i think this would be a good option even for the f open guys thats how solid it is.if a guy wanted you could do some machine work and take a bite of weight off and it would not hurt it abit.

i feel this going to be the future in the ftr class of bypods,my 2 cents
bi-pod.jpg
bi-pod1.jpg
 
I agree, the range of adjustment works well off a bench or raised prone platforms like we use. So far at our range the legs are adequate with my sporter style stock. A flat based TR stock may be a bit dodgy as it rides higher right?? (havnt confirmed or tried one to be sure). If you are say on a hill or uneven piece of dirt then the board trick may come in handy. The pod is working very well for me Jerry.

For example, at 300m, I have about 3/4 inch left in adjustment on the legs. 500m on our range is handled fine. Never shot 1000 so not sure how that would relate into things.
Cheers.

Needed height is varying as it is the relation between front AND rear that matter.

We are open to all feedback and can adapt to weird and varying set ups.

The amount of leg length needed is so dependent on the range and the location you are lying.

I went through alot of travel at both Chilliwack and Homestead by moving over a few firing points. But it still worked and worked well.

The fear was to not get short enough. There are ways to aid if you need more height but if you need to drop lower,well, you are stuck (or digging a hole).

So far, the range of travel which is about 6" vertical seems to be working.

The new batch of pods will be a matte black.

Jerry
 
Back
Top Bottom