New Dlask 20th Anniversary lower

DOOK

DOOK

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
291   0   1
Location
Surrey B.C.
Just got this yesterday.
I wanted one of the 223 lowers being produced for this limited run.
The quality is fantastic, and there are many things done better than my bushmaster IMHO.
I really like the extra engravings, and the fun button marking.
I got to choose the 007 number too.
Of course it is a semi only.

I would recommend Joe's products to anyone.
The service has been exemplary.

1002022.jpg

1002024b.jpg

1002030.jpg

1002021.jpg


Still waiting for the anodising to be done on two of his extended trigger guards. Much nicer part than the stock flat bar.
 
Last edited:
My Dlask lower is nice, though I had a fitting issue with CMMG and Tactical Solutions uppers. What upper are you running on it?

The FA marking looks cool.
 
It's a 20" HBAR Colt chrome lined.
He took it in the back, and came out with three lowers that fit it nicely.

The only thing that is a tad rough is the serial number. It's not too bad. The rest is deeply engraved, and pretty sharp.
The difference is that most other lower's text is stamped, this one is ball milled.
The Tavor mag fit nicely, but I haven't had a chance to put the LAR15's in.
The only other quibble is the F/A marking on the left side goes through the stop notch. They should have milled the bottom flat like the other one before the engraving.
 
Last edited:
Rutger said:
How did they get FA markings on the safety? I thought that CFO wasn't permitting those?
Click to expand...

I heard that wasn't kosher really it is a nice touch .It would be kind of interesting to listen in on a conversation with an overzealous LEO and an owner of one these lowers while shooting at a range
 
Savage said:
I heard that wasn't kosher really it is a nice touch .It would be kind of interesting to listen in on a conversation with an overzealous LEO and an owner of one these lowers while shooting at a range
Click to expand...

They told alberta tactical rifle to lose the full auto markings, no where is it law to remove them, nor have they told anyone else.

Dlask have been up for the full auto markings for a while now
 
Full auto receivers have an extra hole or two...so it isnt a converted receiver...until you drill the holes and mill the innards out-- At which point; your going to the slammer to pick up soap in the shower so Captain Highlighner can slip you a fish-stick :eek:.

So until that point; what difference is a little shape with a 30 beside it??? since you cant get your indicator to turn that way?

m16animation1ww1.gif
 
ViktorF said:
Full auto receivers have an extra hole or two...so it isnt a converted receiver...until you drill the holes and mill the innards out-- At which point; your going to the slammer to pick up soap in the shower so Captain Highlighner can slip you a fish-stick :eek:.

So until that point; what difference is a little shape with a 30 beside it??? since you cant get your indicator to turn that way?

m16animation1ww1.gif
Click to expand...
It's not a CA, but since when has that stopped the RCMP from calling it one? See: VZ58, T97.
 
My point is the last step in producing a receiver with 3 settings would be putting letters on the side and parkerizing the thing indicates its never going to be completed, so they are just symbols.
 
I was just about to post about the dates too! but slavex beat me to it.

Anyway nice looking piece of kit and collection, Enjoy!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom