I just want everyone to be safe and not loose thier firearms privilages or contribute to others loosing privilages.
I'm sure you have the best of intentions David, and that's what motivates your desire for censorship, but I disagree.
I also think, that repeated namecalling (troll) of Luckyorwhat is inappropriate, and unfounded. His posts were legitimate, and he himself thinks your arguments were good enough that he seems to be steering towards picking up an old west replica, to use for his costume.
But he had every right to ask, it wasn't a stupid question, and it is, in fact legally allowable, although perhaps inadvisable, as there are numerous instances of police officers who make gross errors in judgement, and are not called to account.
but I don't mean to get off track here.
The question David posed was this......should people be allowed to post "dumb" threads, or not.
I say Yea!
I think all those in-line 209 shotshell primer, nylon stocked stainless steel thingyies, are "dumb" and "stupid", but I certainly would be defending you and your desire to speak about them on this forum, were it an issue.
I don't think I'd hunt with any sort of handgun, even if I lived in the states. In fact, I don't hunt at all, just like to shoot holes in paper. But if it is legal here, or may be legal here, then power to those that are interested, and good on them for exploring the legality.
There are two ways to kill a valid sport, one is legislation, the other is willing surrender of civil liberties.
If handgun hunting is legal in Canada, with antiques, and a group of enthusiasts practice the craft in a safe and responsible manner, then that is just as likely to be a wedge to open up the laws, as an excuse to shut it down.
Meekness in the hope of going unnoticed and unchallenged is a poor substitute for courage and forthrightness in the political ordeal that the shooting sports are currently under.