New GSG-15 Rifle Preorder!

Tough to say but we have always had good luck with GSG products. You are also getting a lifetime warranty. A manufacturer who is willing to do this is not expecting returns due to questionable quality

So long as it isn't the exact same internals as the issc version, I'll probably buy one then
 
since they are making all these cool copies,,why not centerfire,,5.56,7.62x39,9mm,,something bigger than 22LR,sure that would sell well,or is there copyright laws they would going into,
 
Can you confirm the following:

- Can the bolt lock open without a magazine inserted? (The ISSC Mk22 could not).
- Speaking of which, are ISSC Mk22 magazines compatible?
- Can you get replacement charging handles?
 
Can you confirm the following:

- Can the bolt lock open without a magazine inserted? (The ISSC Mk22 could not).
- Speaking of which, are ISSC Mk22 magazines compatible?
- Can you get replacement charging handles?

I have an Anschutz RX22. It's made by GSG, and it's basically just like the ISSC version except that Anschutz put it together with an Anschutz match-barrel and Anscutz adjustable trigger.
These mags look like my ISSC and Anschutz mags. Hope they can be used on the GSG-15.
I know there are replacement handles in existence for my gun.
 
Are these improved from the ISSC's gen 2?

I'm skeptical. Looks extremely similar to ISSC gen 2/Anschutz MSR Rx 22. The lower clearly looks the same and looks to be secured the same way as current gen guns. Will be interesting to see if they have redesigned things to be easier to take down without the use of so many darned screws. The one thing that sticks out is the shoulder stock area (it looks to be sturdier) ... I would say this is good because the current gen ISSC's shoulder stocks are cheaply made and had a reputation for breaking.

Will be interesting to see the review and breakdown of the internals. Hopefully some good changes have occured!
 
I agree 100%, just can"t get excited about .22lr tactical guns anymore. Got enough 22's as it is, and from what i've seen of past iterations of a 22 of this type their reliability is always suspect.
 
Ok am I not hearing something right.......please correct me if I'm wrong....... but the issc is made in Austria and gsg is German two totally different manufacturers I know they look very similar....but the internals gotta be completely different? Or do they share the same parts? My stg 44 .22 had ran flawless so I think I'll pull the trigger on this......just wanna know what this is mainly composed of? Plastic? Polymer? Aluminum? Is the top rail plastic?
 
Last edited:
So basicly is this thing #### or not?
is the disassembly and cleaning as easy as an ar15?
I understand most people being politicly correct and being indirect with their questions but let's just be honest shall we.
 
As far as I know these are the first into Canada. Maybe we should reserve JUDGEMENT on them until a real review can be done by someone who has handled and used one. Not just internet opinion.
 
So basicly is this thing #### or not?
is the disassembly and cleaning as easy as an ar15?
I understand most people being politicly correct and being indirect with their questions but let's just be honest shall we.

It's not gonna be like takedown on an AR-15. The only "tactical" .22's that takedown like an AR-15 are .22lr AR-15s as far as I know.
My RX22 isn't that bad. It takes minutes. Easier than a Ruger SR22.
 
Last edited:
Updated info in regards to the question of the internals.
I just got an e-mail from the importers regarding this. I hope it clears up any concerns.

Good morning Guy,
No they are not identical. The internals are proprietary specs that have afforded us the opportunity to bring it into the A&W fold with the support of GGS, as always. The stock is also a tried and true GSG stock that has been very successful on the 522, which is prohibited in Canada.

Again, we don’t take lightly in giving out the A&W coverage otherwise we would be looking at a nightmare. Take for example the SA 22. It was the mosquito which was a failure and had the internals not been revised it would have been a warranty nightmare.
 
Back
Top Bottom