New guns from marlin

Nope.. not this cowboy. Been burned bad on gremlins twice in the last ten years. One was a 44 mag and the other a guide gun. Sold both at a big loss with full disclosure regarding the issues. I understand things are better now but ... twice bitten = no faith.
 
I love that 1895 Trapper concept but right now I’m reluctant to let my 1895GS (JM) loose for fear of any disappointments..... :eek:

Will monitor this development as it unfolds....

:wave:

Cheers, Barney
 
39994145231_c6633cbc15_b.jpg


https://secure.viewer.zmags.com/publication/3b5ba328#/3b5ba328/38
 
I'll take my chances on one , perfect for my needs and half the price of one of their custome shop ones. Almost anything you buy nowadays your taking a chance on so I don't stress to much about it.
 
wow they got the 1894 cst available in .38/.357...what a beauty but with a msrp of $1154.00 USD of course...thats like 1500$ CAD to your door....why does it gotta be that way? $700 to $850 CAD and then were talking buying one
 
^^^

With the Remlin reputation and the new MSRP I won't be rushing out to place an online order without physically handling and examining the overall QC of a Remlin rifle. My Henry steel 45-70 meets all my hunting needs with over all fit and finish exceeding Henry's MSRP.

However, the 1895 Trapper does look nice plus with an OAL of 35" makes it a nice cabin/bush rifle.
 
So does everyone who have had a "Remlin" or any other crappy brand of firearm actually own one or have owned one? Or is it just because they read it on the internet or heard it from a friend? I bought a Mossberg once that had quality control issues but the other 12 I've had were fine.... funny how these manufacturers produce so much crap but are still in business and turning a profit.....
Looking forward to getting one!
 
^^^ Right here.... knew nothing about the Remlins prior to my Henry purchase.

Was at Cabela's Barrie in 2016 looking to purchase a 45-75 for my cabin. Asked to look at the 1895 GLB as it was best looking one of the two brands. Picked it up and what the heck... the first thing I noticed was the front sight was bent/ canted slightly to the left and the front sight hood looked off as well. I mentioned this to the salesperson and he never responded back to my observation and just says the Marlin 45-70 is a great bear and deer rifle. I asked if they had another one in stock but told this was the only one. The lever action was ok but nowhere near the smoothness of the Henry. Then I felt the trigger and what the heck... floppy like a loose tooth about to fall out. Handed back the rifle back to the salesperson and asked to look at the Henry steel version of the 45-70.

No regrets purchasing the Henry that day and it was on sale plus it filled my freezer with bear meat last year.

Now if only Henry would make a 16" barrel version I'd stick with a Henry rifle.
 
Last edited:
So does everyone who have had a "Remlin" or any other crappy brand of firearm actually own one or have owned one? Or is it just because they read it on the internet or heard it from a friend? I bought a Mossberg once that had quality control issues but the other 12 I've had were fine.... funny how these manufacturers produce so much crap but are still in business and turning a profit.....
Looking forward to getting one!

I’ve owned dozens and dozens of both......

Most of the original “Remlin” defects are long gone and we’re most commonly a result of mismatched parts during the 2009-2011 period. But the legend lives on with the expectation that the new are the same as the old....... they never will be.
Their checkering and wood shaping/finishing, as well as their new oxide finish/thin blueing is still a joke and will continue to be (just embrace the new Marlin).

Plenty of old JM marlins out there with canted sights, Machining chatter and “Marlin Jam”

If you have a new REP and are happy with it, then that’s awesome.
 
I had a JM and REP Marlin 1894 44 in the past. Both worked good. I am not hesitating on the 1894SBL, with 5 year warranty and good service than Gravel Agency offers Canadian owners
 
Back
Top Bottom