Is the 30-06 known to buck like a mule? Or does it depend more on the rifle itself? The old rifle I used to borrow the odd time gave me the infamous "scope ring" in my forehead years ago, and I hate to admit it, however I still have that scar all these years later. I combined youth with inexperience back then, and wound up with the dreaded battle scar. Knocked me out cold for a few seconds. Maybe I just need to get back on the horse as it was mostly my fault althought that thing had some real punch to it.
I will definitely get into reloading. Months ago I started a thread regarding a reload clinic here in MB. There was alot of interest in putting something together but it wound up fizzling out. I think I would learn better hands on than vidoes, etc although that may just be my only option. Thanks!
Lets have a look at the recoil calculator to see how the '06 and the .308 stack up against each other. We'll assume identical rifles in match configuration weighing 10 lbs.
Scenario #1
.308 150 @ 3000 = 13.39 ft-lbs
.30/06 150@ 3000 = 13.89 ft-lbs
Scenario #2
.308 180 @ 2600 = 14.7 ft-lbs.
.30/06 180 @ 2750 = 16.38 ft-lbs.
Scenario #3
.308 220 @ 2300 = 15.4 ft-lbs
.30/06 220 @ 2550 = 19.73 ft-lbs.
As we see when both cartridges are loaded to their potential with bullets of equal weight and velocity, recoil is similar. But as bullet weight increases and the performance of the .30/06 pulls away from the .308, recoil becomes proportionately heavier. But even with the heaviest bullets, the .30/06 is much more shooter friendly than a .300 magnum or a big case .338. It is unlikely that you could shoot the 150 gr bullet well but be intimidated by the recoil of the 220 gr bullet. Yet a similar rifle in .300 Winchester might prove to be too much requiring you to load it down to .30/06 levels anyway. Having said that a very light .30/06 with a poorly fitting stock without a recoil pad can be a bear to shoot well. My wife shoots her 6 pound 21" 30/06 with full power 180 gr loads without complaint, but that rifle was cut down to fit her properly, has a good quality pad, and she prefers a ghost ring and post to a scope, so there is nothing about that rifle which scares her.
With respect to the scope bite you took, if you get hit with the scope on a .30/30 you'll remember it, never mind a .30/06 or a big case .300 or a .338. I prefer not to have the eye piece of my scopes behind the cocking piece of the bolt, but in the case of the high magnification scopes common on precision rifles, this is not possible due to the critically short eye relief. The combination of a scope with a short eye relief mounted a couple of inches behind the cocking piece of a rifle with moderate recoil, and snap shooting or choosing a shooting position like prone or like sitting when sighting on a high angle target which brings your eye even closer to the scope, is a recipe for pain and bleeding.
I would advise you to have both a hunting scope and a target scope for your rifle. When you are big game hunting, you could mount a low power variable or fixed power scope far enough forward to mitigate the danger of being hit if you take a fast snap shot, or if you find yourself in an unusual shooting position such as one which has your feet higher on a slope than you shoulders. Big game animals are large enough that you shouldn't need the big magnification in order to see them, and your original post did not indicate that you would be shooting game at very long range. Leave the high powered target scope for those days when you'll be shooting at the range where you can optimize your position and eye relief.