Deano said:
We need to do a much better job in convincing the vast majority that we are not a bunch of kooks.
My point exactly!
I don't agree with the antis, I'm just playing the devil's advocate and re-iterating what we're up against. I didn't call Grouse25, you, or anyone else "scary", but we have to accept the fact that we do scare people (not because of what we do, because of what they read in the press).
When I talk about 'tactical' models, I'm talking about what someone else here called "military looking". You and others are absolutely on target when you describe unrestricted models that are as lethal, if not more so, than certain restricted models. The anti-gun lobby obviously doesn't care about facts; they'll spin anything they can to gain mindshare. Hell, more people get killed with cars than guns. You don't hear anybody proposing a ban on cars.
We are an endangered minority. No better off than smokers. An easy target for any politician looking for a few easy votes. Loudly proclaiming our right to own guns isn't going to save us. We have to prove that we're not the problem.
Another thread on this BBS covers one member's challenge to the 50% of guns used in crime come from Canadian sources number that was floated by Toronto police. They're including stolen guns, guns with serial numbers filed off, and people with registered guns who commit crimes. The actual total of the 3 appeared to be 48% of the guns used in crimes in Toronto during a 1 year period. How do they come to the conclusion that all guns with serial numbers removed originally came from Canadian sources?
It this kind of BS that's going to turn the public against us.