Nobody needs an AR15 for hunting

In the late 1960's we hunted withAR15 rifles
They came with 20 round magazines restricted
to five rounds for hunting purposes!
They also had a Colt 3X scope
 
So in one of the SECU meetings, Rachel Dancho refers to this video pointing g out the hazards created by limited operation of a bolt action rifle. In this scenario she explains it would be foolish not to allow for semi-auto hunting rifles to be legitimate for hunting and protection.

Literally found a sliver of hope in maybe arguing a point for the ar15, ar10, and any other semi auto rifle with a hunting caliber.
 
copeland said:
So in one of the SECU meetings, Rachel Dancho refers to this video pointing g out the hazards created by limited operation of a bolt action rifle. In this scenario she explains it would be foolish not to allow for semi-auto hunting rifles to be legitimate for hunting and protection.

Literally found a sliver of hope in maybe arguing a point for the ar15, ar10, and any other semi auto rifle with a hunting caliber.
Click to expand...

For the Liberals the outcome is predetermined and no amount of evidence to the contrary will result in a shift in their position but I admire Rachel Dancho for bringing logic & reason to the table.
 
It's true. Nobody needs an AR-15 for hunting. It's not like the .223 round it fires is one of the most popular hunting rounds in the world or anything.

Everyone should be using a .22 Gauge for hunting, period. The gubberment said so.
 
Sniffer said:
For the Liberals the outcome is predetermined and no amount of evidence to the contrary will result in a shift in their position but I admire Rachel Dancho for bringing logic & reason to the table.
Click to expand...

But,... but if it saves one life then it is all worth it!
 
Maple Leaf Pilgrim said:
ARs aren't meant for hunting. This isn't about hunting or punching holes in paper. Unless you have the balls to accept this, just get on the cattle car with your families and let the courageous get to work.

-S.
Click to expand...

Says who?


It doesnt take "balls" to accept a non-argument. Any non full-auto firearm is suitable for hunting. Literally all firearms are suitable for target practice.

Anything else is not based on reality.

You have an incredible way with words, comparing gun owners to victims of a genocide. Your approach is so backwards.

If you accept a particular firearm isn't a hunting firearm, then you are "getting on the cattle car" no?

It's courageous to fight, not to give up
 
Sniffer said:
For the Liberals the outcome is predetermined and no amount of evidence to the contrary will result in a shift in their position but I admire Rachel Dancho for bringing logic & reason to the table.
Click to expand...

So if you read Mendicino explanation, he literally plagiarized what Dancho said.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom