Non restricted designated marksman semi-automatic rifles?

Thanks, I am pretty sold on the M1A honestly. My only remaining question is whether it should be the 1st or the 2nd. I'm kind of persuaded that I should start with a lower caliber 5.56 rifle, but I imagine there is an M1A in my future.

I have been dreaming about it haha.

I wish I had unlimited wallet :)

If you start low you will always want bigger... I started at .308 and now it looks like the end of this month I will be going .50bmg. I would recommend .308 for what you are wanting to do with it. Why spend a bunch of money just to build up to something later... But then again I am that guy that started with a Colt 1911 .45 as my first handgun. By my fourth I purchased the S&W 500... Like I say, find one, shoot it, and you will have your answer.
 
waaaaaaaaaaaah nobody needs nothing rifles waaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh

tumblr_ll2bimKMBp1qe7iej.jpg
 
Sorry, perhaps you misread me as I agree with everything you just said.

My post was sarcasm aimed back at those who are telling me that I don't need the rifle I am looking for. I am not going to apologize anymore for wanting to go find a military fielded, designated marksman rifle, in as close to the same configuration as its field service use as I can make it.

Many people here have been very helpful but a few have come onto this thread apparently with no other agenda than to attack me for wanting to buy this rifle, which is really, really ironic.

We are not, "attacking you for wanting to buy this rifle", we are going after your phrasing, which IMHO are very loaded questions, ones which the look VERY good in newspaper headlines.


"Canadian gun owners can purchase military fielded, designated marksman rifle, in as close to the same configuration as its field service use "


-great..... just great.

you want a "Miltary fielded DMR rifle"?
The ruger 10/22..

The Ruger 10/22 is a fully suppressed 0.22 caliber semi auto sniper rifle with a 10 rounds rotary magazine.

In 1987, the Intifada – the Palestinian uprising against the Israeli regime in the Occupied Territories – broke out, and involved mass violent clashes between Israeli security forces and Palestinians protestors. As a result, the Israeli security forces needed a weapon with a more potent firepower then the standard riot control metal covered rubber round, but at the same time less lethal then the standard issue 5.56 mm round of the M16/Galil assault rifles. So the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) searched for a 0.22 caliber accurate rifle that will be used to take out the key protest leaders by shooting them in the legs.

The Ruger 10/22, fitted with a X4 day optic, a full length suppressor and a Harris bipod was selected for this role and was due to be issued to all infantry oriented units, including both special and conventional forces. However, as often happens in the shoestring budget IDF, financial problems prevented the weapon’s mass distribution, and it was mainly issued to Special Forces (SF) units. Moreover, instead of using the rifle as a riot control weapon, as originally intended, the Israeli SF deployed the Ruger 10/22 more as a “Hush Puppy” weapon used to silently and effectively eliminate disturbing dogs prior to operations.

In the recent Israeli-Palestinian clashes began in 2000, the Ruger resumes it’s original role as a less lethal riot control weapon. However, it’s usage in this role was rather controversial this time. After several incidents involving the death of Palestinians by the Ruger fire, the IDF conducted a field experiment in the Ruger at the IDF Sniper School in Mitkan Adam under the supervision of the IDF Judge Advocate General (JAG). The test showed that the Ruger was more lethal then thought especially in upper body injuries. Also, since it’s suppressed and was considered less lethal by the troops, the soldiers were much more likely to use the Ruger loosely then intended.

As a result of this test, the JAG reclassified the Ruger as a lethal weapon. As a lethal weapon, the usage of the Ruger in riot control is much more limited today. In the IDF Center Command it was completely prohibited to use and the IDF South Command it’s deployment was cut down dramatically.

taken from :
http://www.ruger1022.com/docs/israeli_sniper.htm

its non-restricted, semi auto, and you can get it really close to it's military fielded configuration. (with the exception of suppressor)
 
We are not, "attacking you for wanting to buy this rifle", we are going after your phrasing, which IMHO are very loaded questions, ones which the look VERY good in newspaper headlines.


"Canadian gun owners can purchase military fielded, designated marksman rifle, in as close to the same configuration as its field service use "


-great..... just great.

you want a "Miltary fielded DMR rifle"?
The ruger 10/22..



taken from :
http://www.ruger1022.com/docs/israeli_sniper.htm

its non-restricted, semi auto, and you can get it really close to it's military fielded configuration. (with the exception of suppressor)

Lol....Shoulda sent that to the papers when everyone was whining about how "heavy handed" the police were during the G20 summit....
 
"Canadian gun owners can purchase military fielded, designated marksman rifle, in as close to the same configuration as its field service use "

Thank God for that!

you want a "Miltary fielded DMR rifle"?
The ruger 10/22..

You know I really might buy that rifle as well. Everyone tells me I should have a 22 for practice right? It seems like a good 22 and the IDF's vote of confidence in the rifle really confirms that.

Maybe you're missing the fact people are telling you that you CAN'T have the rifle you're looking for.

The non-trolls who responded to the thread have given me a couple of excellent choices all of which meet my requirement. Now I'm trying to pick between them: M1A, Swiss Arms Classic being the leaders in my mind. There's also QBU-88 which I'm trying to find out more about, and if it gets an FRT soon the SAPR. I'm looking for evidence that G36 was ever fielded semi-auto which would put SL-8 on the table.

I am generally persuaded now that if you put a scope on it even if it has a selector it wouldn't be fired that way, so the "no FA" is more cherry on the cake.

Why can't I?
 
I'm looking for evidence that G36 was ever fielded semi-auto which would put SL8 on the table.

The SL-8 is not simply a semi-auto G-36. It doesn't just have a different stock - it has different stock/pistol grip attachments, and those parts aren't interchangeable. The SL8s that have been dressed up to look like a G36 aren't wearing G36 stocks, but are in fact wearing an after market, not made by HK stock that will only fit the SL8.

Here is a G36 - pay attention to the stock and pistol grip:
P3qqkvk6f5w8fyunjsse.jpg


The next bunch are converted SL8s. Again, notice that the stock and pistol grip are now part of one larger unit:
sl81qt4.gif


sl8-g36.jpg


Therefore the SL8 is dirty and impure.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom