Non-Restricted in .308

Turf said:
Or you could build your own. Remington 7600 Police .308 and it is non restricted. It's not quite finished but it is getting there.

7600Quicke-mailview.jpg


Folded

7600FLQuicke-mailview.jpg


Still waiting for new optics, flash hider and tapered front rail with vertical grip
Click to expand...

Very Nice.

Sorry for the hijack but can I ask where you got that folding stock??

Gas Can
 
Turf said:
Or you could build your own. Remington 7600 Police .308 and it is non restricted. It's not quite finished but it is getting there.

7600Quicke-mailview.jpg


Folded

7600FLQuicke-mailview.jpg


Still waiting for new optics, flash hider and tapered front rail with vertical grip
Click to expand...


Not to be rude, but when I look at that rifle I think paintball.:confused: :p
 
:) To each his own. But please let me know if you find a paintball gun that'll shoot its load at 2820FPS, hit the 10 ring 9/10 times without splattering crap all over the place:p
 
Find a CA M-14 and pick it up minus the reciever. Buy a Rinco, strip it down to the reciever and save the parts for spares or sell them. Put those GI parts on your forged reciever and you've got a rifle which beats anything Springfield has made since they ran out of GI parts back in the 80s. You'll still come in less than 1/2 what a new Springfield would cost and have a way better rifle. If you're concerned about asthetics then have it reparked so everything matches. Put that extra $1000 bucks into ammo, mags, mount and optics.. a second rifle etc.
cheers

Turf: I like it. Its very "Escape from New York". ;)
 
Yes maybe it seem elitist but since one year I read these forums and there is not one week where someone is telling #### about Springfield M1A VS Norinco M-305... this is just boring. From where this attitude came from?? To get a M1A Super Match I had to lower my gun collection of 50+ and divided it by 3, I do not think I am so elitist. By the way your Mustang example is excellent.
wobbles99 said:
Like I said I'm not knocking the springfield I'm just showing that the chinese rifles aren't so bad for someone who doesn't have the bank roll for a M1A. I hate when people bash the norcs. It's elitist. Of course a M1A is going to out perform a M14S. I would ask for my money back if it didn't. Is the M14S a paperweight? NO.

Think of it this way. If you walk into a ford dealership and see two mustangs in the show room. One is a base model V6 with crappy rims, quiet exhaust, soft suspension, and cloth seats. The other is a Cobra with a supercharged V8, 17" chrome rims, dual exhaust, lowered suspension, and recaro racing seats. Is the Cobra going to walk all over the base model? Hell yeah. Will the base model get you from point A to point B? Sure will. Can you turn the base model into a street lethal drag machine that will stomp the cobra into the ground? Yes but it will cost you time and money.

Okay I will admit that the norc has a piece of junk stock, there were lots of places where the metal had been ground a little to fit and were rough, the trigger isn't exactly match grade, and it will double on soft primers.
But it is still part of my collection and I doubt I'll give it up.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
"...It's the same rifle in fact!..." They aren't, but close. Both a copies of the same rifle. Fulton is in the business of building and selling M1A style rifles for large USD's. Take what they say with a grain of salt.
"...Nothing over 168gr. should be used in any of the M14 family anyway..." Nonsense. I've never once, in 30 some years, seen nor heard of an M1A or an M-1 damaged by shooting heavier bullets. Prior to getting on the Internet, I've never once seen any mention anywhere of either rifle being damaged by heavier than 180 grain bullets.
Properly loaded handloads won't bother them either. SA Inc says not to use reloads in an M1A because of U.S. liability law suits. They don't want to defend against a frivolous law suit caused by poorly loaded ammo.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom