norinco-97

I feel the pain of our lefty bro's.

By careful eye-balling, I think the two rifles I fired have thrown the brass at an average of about 40-45 degrees from the horizontal, and slightly forward, say 75-80 degrees from the barrel axis.
Of course, I think you all know that this can be the subject of how much the extractor is lubed (not to mention clean). A bone-dry (and/or dirty) extractor compared to a clean and slightly lubed one will throw brass on slightly different trajectories.

About the deflector, I don’t know if and how it will work. The ejection port starts about 6 ¾” from the butt-pad. So, to understand how this is going to be, take any rifle you have (but we all know Deckard has only one rifle :D ) and mark 6 ¾” from the butt-plate with a piece of tape. To have a better idea, you can also tape a piece of cardboard (like a small box of matches or something) perpendicular on the stock at that mark. Try to see if it touches your face. Allow (theoretically) for some recoil, as the gun will move regardless of the fact that it’s a gas-op’ed 223.
It wouldn’t work for me. I tried this, the deflector would simply push my cheek away from the gun. It’s not funny being hit in your face with parts of a gun which are hard and sometimes with sharp edges. It’s MUCH more damaging than being hit in a boxing match, take my word for it, since I had them both.



I would say that you have to apply common sense and to pay attention to the geometrics of that deflector and have it work for you in both doing what it's supposed to do properly and not hitting you in the face.
One solution would be to make a long and very-very thick cheek rest from the butt-pad all the way forward to the ejection port. In this way, it would not present any edge or surface in front of your face. It can be at the same height with the stock, slightly thicker in the front than in the back, but again, with no sharp edges in front of the face. The front piece of this long part would also be (or contain) the said deflector, but it has to be contained in the thickness of the cheek rest, and not to stick out in any way.
To compensate for your head sitting away from the gun, the scope (red dot, whatever) would have to be offset on the right side of the rifle. It would work only assuming the dominant eye is the left eye.
I’ve made one of this for a lefty who had a Muzzle-Lite bull-pup stock for 10/22 back in the day when we were allowed to have them. It was a deflector initially, but later he had the idea to put a removable cover to double it as brass-catcher. I don’t know what became of that stock after the ban, but I’m sure it was destroyed :( That friend is a notorious shyte starter on this forum.

It's premature since Type 97 didn't start to hit the market in numbers yet, but if anyone wants to try to build this in the future, keep in mind that 223 cases are much longer than 22RF and they come out of the port spinning.

My 2c
:)
 
Last edited:
Wow. Thanks for that!! :rockOn:


I like the idea of a stock cover/deflector/brass catcher. I would make mine out of Kydex, something like this:
http://www.elmfg.com/pics/139.jpg

In fact, this unit may fit and solve all the problems.

This, of course, would be dependent on the landed cost of the Norinco. If they arrive sub $1000 as everyone is hoping, then I would buy one to tinker. If not, it is too expensive to tinker with.
 
Also, get these!

chicom6.jpg
 
Frankly, a bullpup semi-auto shotgun with interchangable barrels (and choke tubes on the long barrel) would be way more useful to me than a .223.

I'd want a barrel that made the overall lenght just barely 27" (in case I had to re-crown the barrel), a rifled barrel about 24" long for maximum velocity from slow powders (see the 12ga from hell thread), and then a long barrel that swung decently for clays and fowl.

Oh ya, and I want it for $1k
 
Any news on a possible import date yet for the 97? I used to think these things were ugly but as they slowly grow on me i'm getting anxious to see them hit the market at a decent price.

here are some 95 photo's

type95rifle2a.jpg

type95rifle6a.jpg
 
So if I were to import a few QBZ97 from China directly, what kind of import process would I have to go through?

Is it similar to "importing from US" article posted in legalese?

Don't worry about the export process, that I can take care of :D.
 
So if I were to import a few QBZ97 from China directly, what kind of import process would I have to go through?

Is it similar to "importing from US" article posted in legalese?

Don't worry about the export process, that I can take care of :D.

i have no idea but bring one in for me....:D
 
My mistake, all QBZ97s are non-restricted, the qbz95 are restricted

Length 609 mm (QBZ-95B Carbine)
745 mm (QBZ-95 Rifle)
758 mm (QBZ-97 and QBZ-97A)
840 mm (QBB-95 LSW)

Barrel length 369 mm (QBZ-95B Carbine)
463 mm (QBZ-95 Rifle)
490 mm (QBZ-97 and QBZ-97A)
600 mm (QBB-95 LSW)
 
It seems that these will be a popular rifle, Some guys have opted to wait for this as an option in the non-restricted rifle category. 470mm bbl will make these a winner.

in a side by side comparison with the Tavor and the Steyr AUG they are definately not as "finished" but seem to be a rugged and reliable looking rifle. They are also light weight and the rear stock is smaller and lighter than the comparable Tavor.

TMSATAC2007.07.jpg


even with a rail these would still be suitable with the iron sights. (My preference) A rail and optics would seem too high IMHO

maybe next year when someone brings these in ... (nudge, nudge, wink wink) :wave:
 
even with a rail these would still be suitable with the iron sights. (My preference) A rail and optics would seem too high IMHO

That's how high the EoTech will sits when installed on the Picatinny Rail designed for the Airsoft Version of the Type 97:

5.jpg


http://www.realsword.com.hk/gun_97_p.htm

I know it is intended for airsoft but why we can't get someone to import few of these rail to see if it works on the real Type 97?
 
Last edited:
This is probably the next issue to the PLA lol

What it needs is a goose neck type mount, that cantilevers out ahead of the charging handle.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom